Article

Differential network biology.

Departments of Medicine and Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Molecular Systems Biology (Impact Factor: 11.34). 01/2012; 8:565. DOI: 10.1038/msb.2011.99
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Protein and genetic interaction maps can reveal the overall physical and functional landscape of a biological system. To date, these interaction maps have typically been generated under a single condition, even though biological systems undergo differential change that is dependent on environment, tissue type, disease state, development or speciation. Several recent interaction mapping studies have demonstrated the power of differential analysis for elucidating fundamental biological responses, revealing that the architecture of an interactome can be massively re-wired during a cellular or adaptive response. Here, we review the technological developments and experimental designs that have enabled differential network mapping at very large scales and highlight biological insight that has been derived from this type of analysis. We argue that differential network mapping, which allows for the interrogation of previously unexplored interaction spaces, will become a standard mode of network analysis in the future, just as differential gene expression and protein phosphorylation studies are already pervasive in genomic and proteomic analysis.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
177 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Different methods have been developed to infer regulatory networks from heterogeneous omics datasets and to construct co-expression networks. Each algorithm produces different networks and efforts have been devoted to automatically integrate them into consensus sets. However each separate set has an intrinsic value that is diluted and partly lost when building a consensus network. Here we present a methodology to generate co-expression networks and, instead of a consensus network, we propose an integration framework where the different networks are kept and analysed with additional tools to efficiently combine the information extracted from each network.
    BMC Systems Biology 09/2014; 8(1):111. · 2.98 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Large-scale genetic perturbation screens are a classical approach in biology and have been crucial for many discoveries. New technologies can now provide unbiased quantification of multiple molecular and phenotypic changes across tens of thousands of individual cells from large numbers of perturbed cell populations simultaneously. In this Review, we describe how these developments have enabled the discovery of new principles of intracellular and intercellular organization, novel interpretations of genetic perturbation effects and the inference of novel functional genetic interactions. These advances now allow more accurate and comprehensive analyses of gene function in cells using genetic perturbation screens.
    Nature Reviews Genetics 12/2014; · 41.06 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Parkinson's disease (PD)-classically characterized by severe loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta-has a caudal-rostral progression, beginning in the dorsal motor vagal nucleus and, in a less extent, in the olfactory system, progressing to the midbrain and eventually to the basal forebrain and the neocortex. About 90% of the cases are idiopathic. To study the molecular mechanisms involved in idiopathic PD we conducted a comparative study of transcriptional interaction networks in the dorsal motor vagal nucleus (VA), locus coeruleus (LC), and substantia nigra (SN) of idiopathic PD in Braak stages 4-5 (PD) and disease-free controls (CT) using postmortem samples. Gene coexpression networks (GCNs) for each brain region (patients and controls) were obtained to identify highly connected relevant genes (hubs) and densely interconnected gene sets (modules). GCN analyses showed differences in topology and module composition between CT and PD networks for each anatomic region. In CT networks, VA, LC, and SN hub modules are predominantly associated with neuroprotection and homeostasis in the ageing brain, whereas in the patient's group, for the three brain regions, hub modules are mostly related to stress response and neuron survival/degeneration mechanisms.
    BioMed Research International 01/2014; 2014:543673. · 2.71 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
34 Downloads
Available from
May 29, 2014