Article

Development of short forms from the PROMIS™ sleep disturbance and Sleep-Related Impairment item banks.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, USA.
Behavioral Sleep Medicine (Impact Factor: 1.56). 12/2011; 10(1):6-24. DOI: 10.1080/15402002.2012.636266
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This article reports on the development of short forms from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS™) Sleep Disturbance (SD) and Sleep-Related Impairment (SRI) item banks. Results from post-hoc computerized adaptive testing (CAT) simulations, item discrimination parameters, item means, and clinical judgments were used to select the best-performing 8 items for SD and SRI. The final 8-item short forms provided less test information than the corresponding full banks, but correlated strongly with the longer forms. The short forms had greater measurement precision than the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), as indicated by larger test information values across the continuum of severity, despite having fewer total items--a major advantage for both research and clinical settings.

Full-text

Available from: Paul A Pilkonis, May 27, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
208 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sleep disturbance constitutes a major risk factor for drinking relapse after alcohol withdrawal and necessitates regular follow-up. We reported previously that the sum-score of the 4 sleep items of the Hamilton Anxiety and Depression Scales (the Short Sleep Index [SSI]) constitutes a valid and simple sleep measurement tool. The objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric features of the SSI relative to the lengthier Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), which is widely used for measuring sleep disturbance in patients with alcohol use disorders during and after alcohol withdrawal. In this French, multicenter, cross-sectional survey, alcoholic patients were recruited in 2 academic hospitals and 1 community treatment center. Demographic data, alcohol history, and current consumption of alcohol and other abused substances were documented. The SSI and the PSQI questionnaires were completed in face-to-face interviews by a trained clinical research associate. A total of 257 patients were studied (88 females), with a mean age of 49 years (range: 24-80 years). The prevalence of sleep disturbance as measured by the PSQI and the SSI was 73.5% and 74.3%, respectively. The correlation between the 2 indices was strong (r = 0.764; 95% CI: 0.709-0.811), with negative and positive predictive values for the SSI (score > 1) of 71.2% and 89%, respectively, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85-0.92). The discriminant and convergent validity of the SSI was found to be noninferior to the PSQI. Compared to the PSQI, the SSI represents a quick, quantifiable, and reliable method that could help clinicians assess and manage sleep disturbance in alcoholic patients.
    Journal of Addiction Medicine 01/2015; 9(1):25-30. DOI:10.1097/ADM.0000000000000063 · 1.71 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Autonomic dysregulation has been hypothesized to play a role in the relationships between psychopathology and cardiovascular risk. An important transdiagnostic factor that has been associated with autonomic dysfunction is perseverative cognition (PC), mainly present in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) in the form of rumination. As the ability to adaptively let our mind wander without ruminating is critical to mental health, this study aimed to examine the autonomic concomitants of functional vs. dysfunctional intrusive thoughts in MDD. Ambulatory heart rate (HR) and variability (HRV) of 18 MDD subjects and 18 healthy controls were recorded for 24 h. Approximately every 30 min during waking hours subjects reported their ongoing thoughts and moods using electronic diaries. Random regression models were performed. Compared to controls, MDD subjects were more often caught during episodes of PC. In both groups, PC required more effort to be inhibited and interfered more with ongoing activities compared to mind wandering (MW) (ps < 0.0001). This cognitive rigidity was mirrored by autonomic inflexibility, as PC was characterized by lower HRV (p < 0.0001) compared to MW. A worse mood was reported by MDD patients compared to controls, independently of their ongoing cognitive process. Controls, however, showed the highest mood worsening during PC compared to being on task and MW. HRV during rumination correlated with self-reported somatic symptoms on the same day and several dispositional traits. MDD subjects showed lower HRV during sleep, which correlated with hopelessness rumination. Results show that PC is associated with autonomic dysfunctions in both healthy and MDD subjects. Understanding when spontaneous thought is adaptive and when it is not may clarify its role in the etiology of mood disorders, shedding light on the still unexplained association between psychopathology, chronic stress, and risk for health.
    Frontiers in Neuroscience 01/2015; 8(433). DOI:10.3389/fnins.2014.00433
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction/background Sleep disturbance may influence the development of cancer and responses to treatment. It is also closely tied to recovery and quality of life in cancer patients, survivors, and caregivers, and recent studies have begun to show beneficial effects of sleep-promoting interventions. Despite the importance of sleep to cancer and its treatment and the availability of numerous tools for measuring sleep quality and quantity, sleep measurements are underutilized in cancer studies. Methods This review, written for cancer researchers interested in incorporating sleep measures into their studies, is designed to raise awareness about the importance of sleep and suggests strategies for including sleep evaluation in cancer studies. Conclusions Inclusion of readily available sleep measures may ultimately improve cancer care by facilitating studies that lead to a greater understanding of how sleep and sleep disturbance influence all aspects of cancer care and the patient experience.
    Supportive Care Cancer 12/2014; 23(4). DOI:10.1007/s00520-014-2537-0 · 2.50 Impact Factor