Article

Differential clinical profile of candesartan compared to other angiotensin receptor blockers

The Brunner Institute for Cardiovascular Research, Wolfson Medical Center and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Vascular Health and Risk Management 12/2011; 7:749-59. DOI: 10.2147/VHRM.S22591
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The advantages of blood pressure (BP) control on the risks of heart failure and stroke are well established. The renin-angiotensin system plays an important role in volume homeostasis and BP regulation and is a target for several groups of antihypertensive drugs. Angiotensin II receptor blockers represent a major class of antihypertensive compounds. Candesartan cilexetil is an angiotensin II type 1 (AT[1]) receptor antagonist (angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB]) that inhibits the actions of angiotensin II on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Oral candesartan 8-32 mg once daily is recommended for the treatment of adult patients with hypertension. Clinical trials have demonstrated that candesartan cilexetil is an effective agent in reducing the risk of cardiovascular mortality, stroke, heart failure, arterial stiffness, renal failure, retinopathy, and migraine in different populations of adult patients including patients with coexisting type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, or kidney impairment. Clinical evidence confirmed that candesartan cilexetil provides better antihypertensive efficacy than losartan and is at least as effective as telmisartan and valsartan. Candesartan cilexetil, one of the current market leaders in BP treatment, is a highly selective compound with high potency, a long duration of action, and a tolerability profile similar to placebo. The most important and recent data from clinical trials regarding candesartan cilexetil will be reviewed in this article.

0 Followers
 · 
92 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In patients and animals with hypertension, sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activation is present. We have demonstrated that angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT(1)R)-induced oxidative stress in the rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM), a vasomotor center in the brainstem, causes SNS activation in hypertensive rats. The aim of the present study was to determine whether orally administered AT(1)R blockers (ARBs) inhibit SNS activation through an anti-oxidant effect via inhibition of AT(1)R in the RVLM of hypertensive rats and, if so, whether the benefits are class effects of ARBs. Stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSPs), a hypertensive model with sympathoexcitation, were divided into four groups: SHRSPs treated with telmisartan (TLM), candesartan (CAN), or hydralazine (HYD) and a vehicle group (VEH). Although systolic blood pressure was reduced in the TLM, CAN and HYD groups to the same level, heart rate, SNS activation and oxidative stress in the RVLM were significantly lower in the TLM group only. The pressor effect caused by the microinjection of angiotensin II into the RVLM and the depressor effect caused by the microinjection of tempol, a superoxide dismutase mimetic, into the RVLM were both significantly smaller in TLM, but not in CAN or HYD. These results suggest that orally administered TLM inhibits SNS activation through an anti-oxidant effect via inhibition of AT(1)R in the RVLM of SHRSPs; these results are also independent of depressor effects and are not class effects of ARBs.
    Hypertension Research 05/2012; 35(9):940-6. DOI:10.1038/hr.2012.63 · 2.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The effects of angiotensin receptor blocker, diuretic, a calcium antagonist, and their combination were evaluated on the progression of cardiovascular and renal damage in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) given excess salt. To this end, 8-week male SHRs were divided into 7 groups. The control group (C) received normal NaCl (0.6%) diet. All other groups were given 8% NaCl rat chow. In addition, group 2 was given placebo (tap water alone), group 3 the angiotensin receptor antagonist telmisartan (10 mg/kg per d), group 4 received the diuretic chlorothiazide (80 mg/kg per d), group 5 was given telmisartan plus the diuretic, group 6 was given the calcium antagonist amlodipine (10 mg/kg per d), and group 7 was given telmisartan plus amlodipine. All treatments lasted for 8 weeks. Compared with controls, mean arterial pressure (MAP), renal blood flow, coronary flow reserve, minimal coronary vascular resistance, diastolic time constant, and maximal rate of ventricular pressure fall were all adversely affected by salt loading. Increased left ventricular mass with marked cardiac fibrosis was also found in the salt-overloaded SHR group. Telmisartan normalized all indices except MAP, whereas diuretic and amlodipine only partially restored cardiac functional and mass indexes. Combination therapy with telmisartan and either diuretic or amlodipine also normalized all indices including arterial pressure. These data suggest that (1) cardiovascular damage induced by excess salt in the SHRs was not pressure dependent; (2) compared with the calcium antagonist and diuretic, blockade of angiotensin receptors was extremely effective in this model.
    Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics 08/2012; 18(2). DOI:10.1177/1074248412458155 · 3.07 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: This study was performed to address the pathological roles of the skeletal renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in type 1 diabetes-induced osteoporosis and the effects of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker losartan on bones in diabetic mice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bone histomorphology was detected by H&E staining, Safranin O staining and X-ray radiography. Micro-CT was performed for the analysis of bone parameters. Gene and protein expression were determined by RT-PCR and immunoblotting. RESULTS: Type 1 diabetic mice displayed osteopenia phenotype, and losartan treatment had no osteoprotective effects on diabetic mice as shown by the reduction of bone mineral density and microarchitectural parameters at the proximal metaphysis of the tibia. The mRNA expression of AGT, renin receptor and ACE, and protein expression of renin and AT1R were markedly up-regulated in the bones of vehicle-treated diabetic mice compared to those of non-diabetic mice. The treatment with losartan further significantly increased the expression of AGT, renin, angiotensin II and AT1R, and reduced the expression of AT2R receptor as compared to those of diabetic mice. CONCLUSION: Local bone RAS functionally played a role in the development of type 1 diabetic osteoporosis, and losartan had no bone-sparing function in diabetes mice because of enhance skeletal RAS activity.
    Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System 01/2013; 15(3). DOI:10.1177/1470320312471229 · 2.27 Impact Factor
Show more

Preview (2 Sources)

Download
0 Downloads
Available from