Article

A retrospective analysis of glycol and toxic alcohol ingestion: utility of anion and osmolal gaps

Department of Pathology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA. .
BMC Clinical Pathology 01/2012; 12(1):1. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6890-12-1
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Patients ingesting ethylene glycol, isopropanol, methanol, and propylene glycol ('toxic alcohols') often present with non-specific signs and symptoms. Definitive diagnosis of toxic alcohols has traditionally been by gas chromatography (GC), a technique not commonly performed on-site in hospital clinical laboratories. The objectives of this retrospective study were: 1) to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the osmolal gap in screening for toxic alcohol ingestion and 2) to determine the common reasons other than toxic alcohol ingestion for elevated osmolal gaps.
Electronic medical records from an academic tertiary care medical center were searched to identify all patients in the time period from January 1, 1996 to September 1, 2010 who had serum/plasma ethanol, glucose, sodium, blood urea nitrogen, and osmolality measured simultaneously, and also all patients who had GC analysis for toxic alcohols. Detailed chart review was performed on all patients with osmolal gap of 9 or greater.
In the study period, 20,669 patients had determination of serum/plasma ethanol and osmolal gap upon presentation to the hospitals. There were 341 patients with an osmolal gap greater than 14 (including correction for estimated contribution of ethanol) on initial presentation to the medical center. Seventy-seven patients tested positive by GC for one or more toxic alcohols; all had elevated anion gap or osmolal gap or both. Other than toxic alcohols, the most common causes for an elevated osmolal gap were recent heavy ethanol consumption with suspected alcoholic ketoacidosis, renal failure, shock, and recent administration of mannitol. Only 9 patients with osmolal gap greater than 50 and no patients with osmolal gap greater than 100 were found to be negative for toxic alcohols.
Our study concurs with other investigations that show that osmolal gap can be a useful diagnostic test in conjunction with clinical history and physical examination.

1 Bookmark
 · 
144 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective To determine the normal osmole gap for 18 previously published formulae used to estimate serum osmolality in dogs.DesignProspective study.SettingUniversity veterinary medical teaching hospital.AnimalsTwo hundred and fifty client-owned dogs.InterventionsNone.Measurements and Main ResultsSerum samples were saved and frozen at −80°C after routine biochemical analysis as ordered by attending clinicians. An Advanced Micro Osmometer 3300 was used to measure serum osmolality. Eighteen distinct formulae previously reported in the medical literature were used to calculate the osmolality from the biochemical analysis results. The calculated osmolality was then subtracted from the measured osmolality to determine the osmole gap. Osmole gaps for azotemic and hyperglycemic dogs were compared to those of dogs without azotemia or hyperglycemia using each formula. The median measured osmolality for all dogs in the study was 302 mOsm/kg (interquartile range 297–307). The osmole gaps varied widely depending on the formula used to calculate osmolality and the presence or absence of hyperglycemia or azotemia. Eleven formulae led to calculated osmolality and osmole gaps that were not statistically different when hyperglycemia or azotemia was present. Four out of these 11 formulae resulted in osmole gaps near zero.Conclusions and Clinical RelevanceMultiple formulae reported to calculate serum osmolality can be used in the clinical setting, but they result in significantly different normal osmole gaps. Clinicians should be aware of the specific reference interval for the formula being used. The authors recommend the formula 2(Na+) + [glucose/18] + [BUN/2.8] because it is easy to use and is reliable even when hyperglycemia or azotemia are present.
    03/2014; 24(2). DOI:10.1111/vec.12153
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A simple, cost effective, and fast gas chromatography method with flame ionization detection (GC-FID) for simultaneous measurement of ethylene glycol, 1,2-propylene glycol and glycolic acid was developed and validated for clinical toxicology purposes. This new method employs a relatively less used class of derivatization agents - alkyl chloroformates, allowing the efficient and rapid derivatization of carboxylic acids within seconds while glycols are simultaneously derivatized by phenylboronic acid. The entire sample preparation procedure is completed within 10min. To avoid possible interference from naturally occurring endogenous acids and quantitation errors 3-(4-chlorophenyl) propionic acid was chosen as an internal standard. The significant parameters of the derivatization have been found using chemometric procedures and these parameters were optimized using the face-centered central composite design. The calibration dependence of the method was proved to be quadratic in the range of 50-5000mgmL(-1), with adequate accuracy (92.4-108.7%) and precision (9.4%). The method was successfully applied to quantify the selected compounds in serum of patients from emergency units.
    Talanta 12/2014; 130C:470-474. DOI:10.1016/j.talanta.2014.07.020 · 3.50 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Autoverification is a process of using computer-based rules to verify clinical laboratory test results without manual intervention. To date, there is little published data on the use of autoverification over the course of years in a clinical laboratory. We describe the evolution and application of autoverification in an academic medical center clinical chemistry core laboratory.
    03/2014; 5(1):13. DOI:10.4103/2153-3539.129450
    This article is viewable in ResearchGate's enriched format

Preview

Download
4 Downloads
Available from