Article

Neuromuscular Ultrasonography: Quantifying Muscle and Nerve Measurements

Department of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1078, USA.
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America (Impact Factor: 1.09). 02/2012; 23(1):133-48, xii. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmr.2011.11.009
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Neuromuscular ultrasonography can be used both descriptively and quantitatively in the evaluation of patients with neuromuscular disorders. This article reviews the quantitative use of this technology, particularly measurements of the size and echogenicity of nerve and muscle, as a tool for assessing the severity, progression, and response of these tissues to therapeutic interventions. Neuromuscular ultrasonography has several features, including portability and noninvasiveness, that make it an attractive research tool for advancing the diagnosis and treatment of neuromuscular disorders.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Michael S Cartwright, May 28, 2015
4 Followers
 · 
108 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective We aimed to determine the utility of muscle ultrasonography (MUS) in addition to electromyography (EMG) in the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Methods In all, 60 patients with ALS and 20 with other neuromuscular disorders underwent MUS and EMG. In addition, 30 healthy controls underwent only MUS. Occurrence of fasciculations and fibrillations was evaluated. Ultrasonic echogenicity was graded semiquantitatively. Results The incidence of fasciculations was significantly higher in patients undergoing MUS than in those undergoing EMG (p < 0.05), even in muscles of full strength (p < 0.001). However, EMG was more sensitive in detecting fibrillations (p < 0.05). MUS had an overall higher sensitivity in detecting spontaneous activity in the tongue (p < 0.05). Patients with ALS showed significantly increased muscle echo intensity (EI) compared to patients who were initially suspected as having ALS and normal controls (p < 0.05), irrespective of the clinical or electrophysiological status. Conclusion Our results showed that the sensitivity and specificity of MUS in diagnosing ALS was almost equivalent to those of EMG, using the Awaji criteria. Combination of MUS and EMG enhances the diagnostic accuracy compared to EMG alone (p < 0.05). Significance The combination of EMG and MUS can be used to evaluate the lower motor neuron affection by reducing the use of the often painful and uncomfortable EMG examinations but without decreasing the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity.
    Clinical Neurophysiology 08/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2014.06.052 · 2.98 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Zusammenfassung Bereits in den 1980er und 1990er Jahren wurden erste vielversprechende Ergebnisse in der Ultraschalluntersuchung der Muskulatur berichtet. Sonografisch läßt sich die Muskelstruktur bzgl. Echogenität beurteilen, es lassen sich Faszikulationen und mit neueren hochauflösenden Sonden auch Fibrillationen detektieren und es lassen sich Atrophieparameter der Muskulatur erheben. Durch die zunehmende Entwicklung der Kernspintomographie geriet die Sonographie hier jedoch deutlich in den Hintergrund und fristete einen Dämmerschlaf für fast 15 Jahre. In letzter Zeit haben jedoch Verbesserungen der Ultraschalldiagnostik durch Breitbandschallköpfe mit variabler Frequenzierung sowie hochauflösende Sonden mit hoher Frequenz und somit erhöh-ter Auflösungsfähigkeit neue Perspektiven ergeben. Es ist nun nicht nur möglich, die Ultrastruktur des Muskels und des ihn umgebenden Gewebes feiner darzustellen, sondern durch automatisierte Grauwertanalysemethoden ist auch eine exaktere Berechnung der Echogenitätsveränderungen mög-lich. Hier bieten sich in der Diagnostik neuromuskulärer Erkrankungen enorme Optionen. In dieser Zusammenschau sollen die Methode, die Untersuchungsabläufe und relevante Befunde der Myoso-nographie vorgestellt und diskutiert werden.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ultrasound has been used effectively to assess body fat for nearly 5 decades, yet this method is not known as well as many other body composition techniques. The purpose of this review is to explain the technical principles of the ultrasound method, explain the procedures for taking a measurement and interpreting the results, evaluate the reliability and validity of this method for measuring subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue, highlight the advantages and limitations of ultrasound relative to other body composition methods, consider its utility to clinical populations, and introduce new body composition-specific ultrasound technology. The focus of this review is adipose, although various tissue thicknesses (e.g., muscle and bone) can be measured with ultrasound. Being a portable imaging device that is capable of making fast regional estimates of body composition, ultrasound is an attractive assessment tool in instances when other methods are limited. Furthermore, much of the research suggests that it is reliable, reproducible, and accurate. The biggest limitations appear to be a lack of standardization for the measurement technique and results that are highly dependent on operator proficiency. New ultrasound devices and accompanying software designed specifically for the purpose of body composition assessment might help to minimize these limitations.
    Journal of obesity 08/2013; 2013:280713. DOI:10.1155/2013/280713