The Role of Race and Poverty on Steps to Kidney Transplantation in the Southeastern United States

Emory Transplant Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
American Journal of Transplantation (Impact Factor: 5.68). 02/2012; 12(2):358-68. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03927.x
Source: PubMed


Racial disparities in access to renal transplantation exist, but the effects of race and socioeconomic status (SES) on early steps of renal transplantation have not been well explored. Adult patients referred for renal transplant evaluation at a single transplant center in the Southeastern United States from 2005 to 2007, followed through May 2010, were examined. Demographic and clinical data were obtained from patient's medical records and then linked with United States Renal Data System and American Community Survey Census data. Cox models examined the effect of race on referral, evaluation, waitlisting and organ receipt. Of 2291 patients, 64.9% were black, the mean age was 49.4 years and 33.6% lived in poor neighborhoods. Racial disparities were observed in access to referral, transplant evaluation, waitlisting and organ receipt. SES explained almost one-third of the lower rate of transplant among black versus white patients, but even after adjustment for demographic, clinical and SES factors, blacks had a 59% lower rate of transplant than whites (hazard ratio = 0.41; 95% confidence interval: 0.28-0.58). Results suggest that improving access to healthcare may reduce some, but not all, of the racial disparities in access to kidney transplantation.

Download full-text


Available from: Rachel E Patzer,
38 Reads

  • Nature Reviews Nephrology 01/2012; 8(3):130. DOI:10.1038/nrneph.2012.6 · 8.54 Impact Factor

  • American Journal of Transplantation 02/2012; 12(2):269-70. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03986.x · 5.68 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In 2007, the Emory Transplant Center (ETC) kidney transplant program implemented a required educational session for ESRD patients referred for renal transplant evaluation to increase patient awareness and decrease loss to follow-up. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of the ETC education program on completion of the transplant evaluation process. Incident, adult ESRD patients referred from 2005 to 2008 were included. Patient data were abstracted from medical records and linked with data from the United States Renal Data System. Evaluation completion was compared by pre- and posteducational intervention groups in binomial regression models accounting for temporal confounding. A total of 1126 adult ESRD patients were examined in two transplant evaluation eras (75% pre- and 25% postintervention). One-year evaluation completion was higher in the post- versus preintervention group (80.4% versus 44.7%, P<0.0001). In adjusted analyses controlling for time trends, the adjusted probability of evaluation completion at 1 year was higher among the intervention versus nonintervention group (risk ratio=1.38, 95% confidence interval=1.12-1.71). The effect of the intervention was stronger among black patients and those patients living in poor neighborhoods (likelihood ratio test for interaction, P<0.05). Standardizing transplant education may help reduce some of the racial and socioeconomic disparities observed in kidney transplantation.
    Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 02/2012; 7(4):648-55. DOI:10.2215/CJN.10071011 · 4.61 Impact Factor
Show more