Effects of Ignatia amara in mouse behavioural models

Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University of Verona (I), Italy.
Homeopathy: the journal of the Faculty of Homeopathy (Impact Factor: 0.75). 01/2012; 101(1):57-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2011.10.001
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Ignatia amara (Ignatia), a remedy made from the Strychnos ignatii seeds, is used for anxiety-related symptoms, but consistent evidence of its activity in reproducible experimental models is lacking. An investigation was performed in order to assess on mice, by means of emotional response models, the activity of homeopathic Ignatia dilutions/dynamizations.
Groups of 8 mice of the CD1 albino strain were treated intraperitoneally for 9 days with 0.3ml of five centesimal (C) dilutions/dynamizations of Ignatia (4C, 5C, 7C, 9C and 30C). Control mice were treated with the same hydroalcoholic (0.3%) solution used to dilute the medicines. Diazepam (1mg/kg) was the positive reference drug. Validated test models for locomotion and emotional response, the Open-Field (OF) and the Light-Dark (LD) tests, were employed. Five replications of the same protocol were carried out, in a randomised way using coded drugs/controls.
In the OF the general locomotion of mice was slightly decreased by Ignatia 4C, but not by Ignatia 5C, 7C, 9C and 30C, indicating the absence of unspecific motor impairment or sedation by these dilutions/dynamizations. Ignatia and diazepam seemed to decrease the number of urine spots released in the OF during 10min, with borderline significance (P=0.083). In the LD the tested medicine showed anxiolytic-like activity (increase of time spent and distance travelled in the lit area), though to a lesser extent than diazepam. The highest and most significant difference with untreated controls (P<0.01) was observed with the 9C dilution/dynamization. Among the 5 replication experiments, the best drug effects were obtained where the baseline anxiety of mice was higher.
Homeopathic Ignatia dilutions/dynamizations (peak at 9C) modify some emotion-related symptoms in laboratory mice without affecting locomotion.

1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The group of P. Bellavite working at Verona university (Institute of Chemistry and Clinical Microscopy, then Department of Pathology and Diagnostics) has been involved in studies on leukocyte metabolism, inflammation, pharmacology of natural products for over twenty years. Part of its studies were dedicated to complementary medicine (phytotherapy, acupuncture, homeopathy, diet), as an Observatory of Complementary Medicine organized by Bellavite and other Verona University researchers was recognized by Institute of Chemistry and Clinical Microscopy since 1997. Starting from y. 2011, studies of the Verona group were the object of some critical opinions, as “letters” or “commentaries”, most of which from the same person, who was former collaborator of the same group until the end of y. 2010. As principal investigator in a series of studies conducted in collaboration with colleagues of Verona University I have the duty to clarify the questions raised. No experiment invalidating experimental findings was ever reported, while the effect of Gelsemium in neurological and behavioural models was reported by several independent laboratories. Even if the whole scientific interest of this provoked discussion could be scarce, its key points are reported here in the interest of completeness and precision of documentation. It should be noted that Bellavite and coworkers never critiqued the experimental work of others, and replied only to criticisms that were considered as inappropriate or affecting Verona university. The same person recently posted in RG website further personal opinions including redundant criticisms (to which we had previously carefully responded), personal attacks and even bizarre statements that by their very nature require no reply. If anyone would need further explanations she/he could contact directly the author ( Needless to say, the concept of "reproducibility" is not applicable to this synthesis of a literature debate.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In September 2013 issue of Int. J. Clin. Pract., a lengthy letter concerned “bias and adverse effects in homeopathy”. The letter apparently raised “scientific criticism”, actually was dedicated to throw mud on researchers who deal with homeopathy issues. As group of scientists working in the University of Verona, here we defend the integrity and reliability of rigorous research in homeopathy, including ours. This clarification letter is published in the interests of providing correct and truthful information to readers. Notes 1: this abstract is provided for Research Gate, the published paper has no abstract; 2: the downloadable text is the same as the published paper, in a format which is freely downloadable; 3: if someone desires further clarifications, he/she can send a personal message to authors thanks.
    International Journal of Clinical Practice 03/2014; 68(3):403-4. DOI:10.1111/ijcp.12349 · 2.54 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As part of a rigorous investigation into the effects of Gelsemium sempervirens on laboratory mice, we performed two complete series of experiments and published three scientific papers. A recent commentary has, however, called into question the reproducibility and validity of these findings. In this article we discuss the major issues raised by this critique within the framework of methodological aspects and the interpretation of results of high-dilution and homeopathic research. The charge of non-reproducibility is shown to be unfounded, because a same homeopathic medicine displayed the same direction of effects in two well-validated models (light-dark and open-field), albeit with nonlinear patterns. The double-blind protocols and statistics by means of ANOVA were performed appropriately and the difference between dilutions of Gelsemium (5cH, 7cH, 9cH and 30cH with variations according to model) and placebo was statistically highly significant. Our investigations brought to light some problems related with the lack of activity of buspirone and diazepam (conventional anxiolytic drugs used as control) on some behavioural parameters, suggesting that Gelsemium may have broader action, and raising doubts as to the reliability of benzodiazepines as positive controls for homeopathic treatments. Concerning the plausibility of experiments in this field, disputed on the grounds of alleged lack of dose-response effect, we note that the latter is not at all uncommon, and can be accounted for by a host of possible reasons. In conclusion, our research line showed reproducible and consistent effects of Gelsemium in laboratory mice.
    International Journal of High Speed Computing 01/2011; 10:325-337.