Article

Meta-analysis of overnight closed-loop randomized studies in children and adults with type 1 diabetes: the Cambridge cohort.

Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Journal of diabetes science and technology 11/2011; 5(6):1352-62. DOI: 10.1177/193229681100500606
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We reviewed the safety and efficacy of overnight closed-loop insulin delivery compared with conventional continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in two distinct age groups with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), young people aged 5 to 18 years and adults, combining data of previously published randomized studies.
We evaluated four randomized crossover studies in 17 children and adolescents [13.4 ± 3.6 years; mean ± standard deviation (SD)] and 24 adults (37.5 ± 9.1 years) on 45 closed-loop (intervention) and 45 CSII (control) visits. Each subject attended for two overnight study visits, using either closed-loop or conventional pump therapy, in random order. In each age group, studies were designed to mimic realistic likely scenarios. In the children and adolescent studies, closed loop was used following a standard evening meal and following 40 min of moderate-intensity exercise. In the adult studies, closed loop was commenced following a 60 g carbohydrate meal or a 100 g carbohydrate meal accompanied by alcohol. The primary outcome measure was time for which plasma glucose was within target range (3.91-8.0 mmol/liter).
Overnight closed loop increased the time in target plasma glucose in both young (from 40% to 60%, p = .002) and adults (from 50% to 76%, p < .001) compared with conventional CSII. Combined analysis showed an increase from 43% to 71% with closed loop (p < .001). Additionally, closed loop reduced the time spent below 3.91 mmol/liter and above 8.0 mmol/liter, from 4.1% to 2.1% (p = .01) and 33% to 20% (p = .03), respectively. Glycemic variability, as measured by the SD of plasma glucose, was lower during closed loop compared with CSII (1.5 versus 2.1 mmol/liter, p = .007).
Overnight closed loop may improve glycemic control and reduce nocturnal hypoglycemia in both young people and adults with T1DM.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
93 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ‘To keep in equilibrium’, one of the Oxford English Dictionary’s many definitions of balance, is a desirable target for anylife, but has special meaning for the life of a person with diabetes. Achieving balance—between hypo- and hyperglycaemia; between energy intake and energy consumption; between insulin action and insulin secretion; between attention to diabetes and attention to everything else—remains challenging, but progress has been made over the last three decades, both in our understanding of how nature achieves balance and in the tools we have to try to reproduce the actions of nature in disease states. In particular, the role of the brain in controlling diabetes, from glucose sensing to decision making, has been investigated. Physiological and neuro-imaging studies are finally being translated into patient benefit, with the aim of improving, as Dr Banting put it, the provision of ‘energy for the economic burdens of life’.
    Diabetic Medicine 04/2014; 31(4):382-92. DOI:10.1111/dme.12351 · 3.24 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent advances in insulins, insulin pumps, continuous glucose-monitoring systems, and control algorithms have resulted in an acceleration of progress in the development of artificial pancreas devices. This review discusses progress in the development of external systems that are based on subcutaneous drug delivery and subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring. There are two major system-level approaches to achieving closed-loop control of blood glucose in diabetic individuals. The unihormonal approach uses insulin to reduce blood glucose and relies on complex safety mitigation algorithms to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia. The bihormonal approach uses both insulin to lower blood glucose and glucagon to raise blood glucose, and also relies on complex algorithms to provide for safety of the user. There are several major strategies for the design of control algorithms and supervision control for application to the artificial pancreas: proportional–integral–derivative, model predictive control, fuzzy logic, and safety supervision designs. Advances in artificial pancreas research in the first decade of this century were based on the ongoing computer revolution and miniaturization of electronic technology. The advent of modern smartphones has created the ability to utilize smartphone technology as the engineering centerpiece of an artificial pancreas. With these advances, an artificial or bionic pancreas is within reach.
    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 04/2014; 1311(1). DOI:10.1111/nyas.12431 · 4.38 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Intensive insulin therapy (IIT) has been shown to reduce micro- and macrovascular complications in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). However, IIT is associated with a significant increase in severe hypoglycemic events, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. Optimization of glycemic control without hypoglycemia (especially nocturnal) should be the next major goal for subjects on insulin treatment. The use of insulin pumps along with continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) has made it easier but requires significant resources and patient education. Research is ongoing to close the loop by integrating the pump and the CGM using different algorithms. The currently available closed-loop system is the threshold suspend. Steps needed to achieve a near-perfect closed-loop are (1) a control-to-range system that will reduce the incidence and/or severity of hyper- and/or hypoglycemia by adjusting the insulin dose and (2) a control-to-target system, a fully automated or hybrid system that sets target glucose levels to individual needs and maintains glucose levels throughout the day using insulin (unihormonal) alone or with other hormones such as glucagon or possibly pramlintide (bihormonal). Future research is also focusing on better insulin delivery devices (pumps), more accurate CGMs, better predictive algorithms, and ultra-rapid-acting insulin analogs to make the closed-loop system as physiological as possible.
    Diabetes Technology &amp Therapeutics 08/2014; 16(8):477-90. DOI:10.1089/dia.2014.0193 · 2.29 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
25 Downloads
Available from
May 30, 2014