Article

Drug policy and the public good: evidence for effective interventions.

King's College London, National Addiction Centre, London, UK.
The Lancet (Impact Factor: 45.22). 01/2012; 379(9810):71-83. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61674-7
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Debates about which policy initiatives can prevent or reduce the damage that illicit drugs cause to the public good are rarely informed by scientific evidence. Fortunately, evidence-based interventions are increasingly being identified that are capable of making drugs less available, reducing violence in drug markets, lessening misuse of legal pharmaceuticals, preventing drug use initiation in young people, and reducing drug use and its consequences in established drug users. We review relevant evidence and outline the likely effects of fuller implementation of existing interventions. The reasoning behind the final decisions for action might be of a non-scientific nature, focused more on what the public and policy-makers deem of value. Nevertheless, important opportunities exist for science to inform these deliberations and guide the selection of policies that maximise the public good.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: John Strang, Jan 20, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
278 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Programmes for testing Alcohol and Drugs (A&D) at the workplace, at random and by surprise, are believed to have a positive impact on safety and to reduce individual’s accident risk. Despite this perception, there is limited scientific evidence and poor statistical support of this assumption. This study aims at testing whether there is such a cause-effect relationship between A&D testing and post-accident reduction, and how to quantify it. The methodology applied data-mining techniques together with classical statistics hypothesis testing. It covers a wide range of data concerning accidents, alcohol and drug tests, biographical and occupational records of a large railway transportation company in Portugal, for a period of 5½ years. Results give sound statistical evidence of individual’s accident risk decrease after being tested, by quantifying the relations between A&D testing and post-testing accidents. Results also estimate the optimal testing frequency that balances testing costs and accident reduction. Optimum rates of tests per year per worker are in the ranges ]0.5–1.0] in white-collars and professions at large, and ]0.0–0.5] in operations/technical personnel. The fraction of accident victims that are prevented by the application of optimal frequencies are around 59% for workers onboard trains, 72% for those working near trains, and 85% for white-collars. Testing at the optimal frequency generates net savings of at least 15:1, in onboard personnel. In conclusion, testing for alcohol and drugs at workplace, at random and by surprise, has a statistically significant preventive effect in overall professions, but is stronger within white-collars.
    Safety Science 10/2014; 68(Oct 2014):108–120. DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2014.03.007 · 1.67 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: 2012 marked the 100th anniversary of the first international treaty on tackling international drug flows. Since the International Opium Convention in 1912 and the UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs in 1961 (and its amendment in 1971) were agreed, development, implementation and assessment of counter-narcotic (CN) activities aimed at reducing the harm caused by illicit drug industries received considerable attention from practitioners and researchers. Studies reveal that, due to the complexity and breadth of the impact of both the illicit drug industry and CN interventions on societies, drug control interventions may result in an array of consequences that are not intended yet may significantly impact societies overall or particular societal groups (Strang et al 2012; Reuter 2009). This paper is concerned with understanding the socio-psychological drivers of the unintended consequences (UCs) of CN interventions aimed at motivating attitudinal and/or behavioural change to prevent or transform individual participation in drug-related activities across the drug supply chain (production, trafficking and consumption).
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cannabis is the most widely used illicit drug in the world. Although the risk of problematic cannabis use is relatively low, the lifetime prevalence of dependence is greater than for all other illicit drugs. As such, the population burden of problematic cannabis use warrants attention. Many health and psychosocial risks associated with cannabis use are exacerbated or predicted by initiation of cannabis use in early adolescence and early adolescent users are more vulnerable to negative developmental outcomes, longer cannabis use trajectories, earlier transitions to heavier use and dependence. This suggests a need for effective prevention interventions targeting this age group. Unfortunately, most prevention efforts focus on individual-level risk factors and evidence indicates that they are not particularly effective for deterring use. This overview outlines a more effective approach for preventing cannabis-related harm. Using a social determinants of health perspective, it highlights peer networks and family structure and quality as the main risk factors associated with early adolescent cannabis use. This article suggests that interventions that targeting these determinants can be effective for preventing cannabis use. It concludes by suggesting complementary harm reduction programmes for older adolescents as a means to further reduce cannabis-related harm.
    Drugs: Education Prevention and Policy 03/2013; 20(2). DOI:10.3109/09687637.2012.752434 · 0.53 Impact Factor