The round nipple shadow

Radiology (Impact Factor: 6.87). 12/1976; 121(2):293-4. DOI: 10.1148/121.2.293
Source: PubMed


It is usually easy to distinguish the round nipple shadow from a lesion, especially by means of repeat radiographs with nipple markers. However, the radiologist must occasionally interpret a round density in the lower chest on the basis of a single radiograph or series of radiographs. Fortunately, a nipple shadow usually has a well-defined outer margin and a poorly defined inner margin. Differentiation of a nipple shadow from an extrapleural or pleural lesion is described. Attention to these findings may prevent needless additional study and patient apprehension.

20 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In a review of 1000 routine chest examinations, the nipple of the male or female breast was visible about 10% of the time. In 14 instances (1.4%), the reviewing radiologist thought that uncertainty of identification warranted additional films. In four of these instances, the density proved to be something other than nipple. In all other instances when a nipple shadow was identified (8.9%), follow-up was not deemed necessary for various, often somewhat subjective reasons. Thus the frequency of erroneous identification of nipples could have been higher. Certainty of nipple identification would have involved considerable cost and inconvenience in repeat examinations. In another group of 500 patients, identification of the nipple with a lead marker on all patients eliminated uncertainty and the necessity for any repeat examinations. The patients placed low cost markers at the time of disrobing. Convenience and certainty were served by this simple maneuver.
    American Journal of Roentgenology 10/1985; 145(3):521-3. DOI:10.2214/ajr.145.3.521 · 2.73 Impact Factor
  • Source

    British Journal of Radiology 05/2000; 73(868):451-2. DOI:10.1259/bjr.73.868.10844874 · 2.03 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Annual company employee physical examinations are performed in Japan and include a chest X-ray. Among nodular shadows observed in the lower lung field, nipple shadow is a normal structure to be differentiated, and understanding its characteristics in chest X-rays aids in the interpretation of solitary nodular shadows. Chest X-rays from male employees over 35 years of age at two different companies were analysed for anatomical location, morphology, and size of nipple shadows. If unilateral or bilateral solitary nodular shadows in the lower lung field coincided with the lead nipple marker, we defined it as 'definitive' nipple shadow. If the nodular shadow was observed to be stable for at least 2 years at the typical nipple position, we defined it as 'possible' nipple shadow without confirmation with nipple marking. Typical nipple position, from the analyses of definitive nipple shadows (n = 15), was between the ninth and tenth posterior ribs and within 60 mm from the inner margin of the rib. The nipple was oval or round and did not exceed 15 mm in size. Incidence of definitive and possible (n = 25) nipple shadows was estimated as 3.5% of examined males (n = 1150). Thoracic computed tomography scanning was conducted in four cases, of which three cases involved solitary nodular shadows that did not coincide with the nipple marker, and one was for a newly formed nodular lesion not detected in previous chest X-rays. Visible male nipple shadows are not rare and need to be differentiated among the solitary nodular shadows in the lower lung field.
    Respirology 02/2005; 10(1):111-5. DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1843.2005.00653.x · 3.35 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications