Article

Energy consumption in optical modulators for interconnects

Ginzton Laboratory, Stanford University, 348 Via Pueblo Mall, Stanford, California 94305-4088, USA.
Optics Express (Impact Factor: 3.53). 03/2012; 20 Suppl 2(6):A293-308. DOI: 10.1364/OE.20.00A293
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We analyze energy consumption in optical modulators operated in depletion and intended for low-power interconnect applications. We include dynamic dissipation from charging modulator capacitance and net energy consumption from absorption and photocurrent, both in reverse and small forward bias. We show that dynamic dissipation can be independent of static bias, though only with specific kinds of bias circuits. We derive simple expressions for the effects of photocurrent on energy consumption, valid in both reverse and small forward bias. Though electroabsorption modulators with large reverse bias have substantial energy penalties from photocurrent dissipation, we argue that modulator diodes with thin depletion regions and operating in small reverse and/or forward bias could have little or no such photocurrent energy penalty, even conceivably being more energy-efficient than an ideal loss-less modulator.

Full-text

Available from: David A. B. Miller, Jun 03, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
128 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Silicon-organic hybrid integrated devices have emerging applications ranging from high-speed optical interconnects to photonic electromagnetic-field sensors. Silicon slot photonic crystal waveguides (PCWs) filled with electro-optic (EO) polymers combine the slow-light effect in PCWs with the high polarizability of EO polymers, which promises the realization of high-performance optical modulators. In this paper, a broadband, power-efficient, low-dispersion, and compact optical modulator based on an EO polymer filled silicon slot PCW is presented. A small voltage-length product of V{\pi}*L=0.282Vmm is achieved, corresponding to an unprecedented record-high effective in-device EO coefficient (r33) of 1230pm/V. Assisted by a backside gate voltage, the modulation response up to 50GHz is observed, with a 3-dB bandwidth of 15GHz, and the estimated energy consumption is 94.4fJ/bit at 10Gbit/s. Furthermore, lattice-shifted PCWs are utilized to enhance the optical bandwidth by a factor of ~10X over other modulators based on non-band-engineered PCWs and ring-resonators.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As electronic device feature sizes scale‐down, the power consumed due to onchip communications as compared to computations will increase dramatically; likewise, the available bandwidth per computational operation will continue to decrease. Integrated photonics can offer savings in power and potential increase in bandwidth for onchip networks. Classical diffraction‐limited photonics currently utilized in photonic integrated circuits (PIC) is characterized by bulky and inefficient devices compared to their electronic counterparts due to weak light–matter interactions (LMI). Performance critical for the PIC is electro‐optic modulators (EOM), whose performances depend inherently on enhancing LMIs. Current EOMs based on diffraction‐limited optical modes often deploy ring resonators and are consequently bulky, photon‐lifetime modulation limited, and power inefficient due to large electrical capacitances and thermal tuning requirements. In contrast, wavelength‐scale EOMs are potentially able to surpass fundamental restrictions set by classical (i.e. diffraction‐limited) devices via (a) high‐index modulating materials, (b) nonresonant field and density‐of‐states enhancements such as found in metal optics, and (c) synergistic onchip integration schemes. This manuscript discusses challenges, opportunities, and early demonstrations of nanophotonic EOMs attempting to address this LMI challenge, and early benchmarks suggest that nanophotonic building blocks allow for densely integrated high‐performance photonic integrated circuits. The performances of electro‐optic modulators (EOM) is determined by the interaction strength between light and matter. Here, EOMs based on sub‐diffraction‐limited optical modes are summarized and discussed. These devices show performance metrics that are able to surpass classical device limits through (a) optical field enhancements, (b) low‐Q resonators and (c) synergistic integration schemes including emerging materials for strong index modulation.
    Laser & Photonics Review 02/2015; 9(2). DOI:10.1002/lpor.201400219 · 9.31 Impact Factor
  • Source