Constructing a robust protein-protein interaction network by integrating multiple public databases

Department of Information Science, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, 2801 S, University Ave, Little Rock, AR 72204-1099, USA.
BMC Bioinformatics (Impact Factor: 2.58). 10/2011; 12 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):S7. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-S10-S7
Source: PubMed


Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are a critical component for many underlying biological processes. A PPI network can provide insight into the mechanisms of these processes, as well as the relationships among different proteins and toxicants that are potentially involved in the processes. There are many PPI databases publicly available, each with a specific focus. The challenge is how to effectively combine their contents to generate a robust and biologically relevant PPI network.
In this study, seven public PPI databases, BioGRID, DIP, HPRD, IntAct, MINT, REACTOME, and SPIKE, were used to explore a powerful approach to combine multiple PPI databases for an integrated PPI network. We developed a novel method called k-votes to create seven different integrated networks by using values of k ranging from 1-7. Functional modules were mined by using SCAN, a Structural Clustering Algorithm for Networks. Overall module qualities were evaluated for each integrated network using the following statistical and biological measures: (1) modularity, (2) similarity-based modularity, (3) clustering score, and (4) enrichment.
Each integrated human PPI network was constructed based on the number of votes (k) for a particular interaction from the committee of the original seven PPI databases. The performance of functional modules obtained by SCAN from each integrated network was evaluated. The optimal value for k was determined by the functional module analysis. Our results demonstrate that the k-votes method outperforms the traditional union approach in terms of both statistical significance and biological meaning. The best network is achieved at k = 2, which is composed of interactions that are confirmed in at least two PPI databases. In contrast, the traditional union approach yields an integrated network that consists of all interactions of seven PPI databases, which might be subject to high false positives.
We determined that the k-votes method for constructing a robust PPI network by integrating multiple public databases outperforms previously reported approaches and that a value of k=2 provides the best results. The developed strategies for combining databases show promise in the advancement of network construction and modeling.

Download full-text


Available from: Yanbin Ye, Oct 01, 2015
29 Reads
  • Source
    • "For instance, unweighted approaches such as the simple union of networks has been applied to the prioritization of genes in Alzheimer's disease using a guilt-by-association inference rule [47], or to the integration of PPI data of model organisms mapped to human through homology [19], or in the context of the functional interpretation of genomic variants to the integration of gene interaction networks [50], or to find functional modules in networks integrated from multiple public databases [51]. Other unweighted approaches for gene prioritization average the scaled Gram matrices obtained from different sources of functional information using suitable kernels [46]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: In the context of "network medicine", gene prioritization methods represent one of the main tools to discover candidate disease genes by exploiting the large amount of data covering different types of functional relationships between genes. Several works proposed to integrate multiple sources of data to improve disease gene prioritization, but to our knowledge no systematic studies focused on the quantitative evaluation of the impact of network integration on gene prioritization. In this paper, we aim at providing an extensive analysis of gene-disease associations not limited to genetic disorders, and a systematic comparison of different network integration methods for gene prioritization. Materials and methods: We collected nine different functional networks representing different functional relationships between genes, and we combined them through both unweighted and weighted network integration methods. We then prioritized genes with respect to each of the considered 708 medical subject headings (MeSH) diseases by applying classical guilt-by-association, random walk and random walk with restart algorithms, and the recently proposed kernelized score functions. Results: The results obtained with classical random walk algorithms and the best single network achieved an average area under the curve (AUC) across the 708 MeSH diseases of about 0.82, while kernelized score functions and network integration boosted the average AUC to about 0.89. Weighted integration, by exploiting the different "informativeness" embedded in different functional networks, outperforms unweighted integration at 0.01 significance level, according to the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test. For each MeSH disease we provide the top-ranked unannotated candidate genes, available for further bio-medical investigation. Conclusions: Network integration is necessary to boost the performances of gene prioritization methods. Moreover the methods based on kernelized score functions can further enhance disease gene ranking results, by adopting both local and global learning strategies, able to exploit the overall topology of the network.
    Artificial intelligence in medicine 06/2014; 61(2). DOI:10.1016/j.artmed.2014.03.003 · 2.02 Impact Factor
  • Source
    BMC Bioinformatics 10/2011; 12 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):S1. DOI:10.1186/1471-2105-12-S10-S1 · 2.58 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) though present themselves as a group of non-coding small RNAs play critical roles in many biological and pathological processes. Among which the regulation of human cancer is one of the most excited potentiality. The goal of this study is to obtain miRNAs robustly associated with cancer by screening all of the possible miRNAs/cancer pairs in three consecutive steps. First, in co-gene analysis, gene set enrichment analysis is carried out for all miRNA/cancer pairs. Second, in co-function analysis, information theoretic similarity on GO is calculated for miRNA/cancer pairs screened from the former step. Third, in co-pathway analysis, pathway enrichment analysis is performed for miRNA/cancer pairs screened from the second step. In this study, we totally included 776 miRNAs and 25 cancer types. As a result, 94 miRNAs were identified with robust association with 17 types of cancer. Meanwhile, 83 pathways with relevance to both miRNAs and cancer were also singled out. This framework provides an effective way to narrow down miRNAs for cancer and to pinpoint corresponding pathways.
    Computers in Biology and Medicine 03/2012; 42(5):624-30. DOI:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2012.02.008 · 1.24 Impact Factor
Show more