A postmarketing evaluation of the safety of Ann Arbor strain live attenuated influenza vaccine in adults 18-49 years of age

Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Oakland, CA, USA.
Vaccine (Impact Factor: 3.62). 03/2012; 30(20):3053-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.02.080
Source: PubMed


The Ann Arbor strain-live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) was licensed in 2003 for use in the United States for individuals aged 5-49 years of age. As part of a postmarketing commitment to safety, LAIV was studied in adults 18-49 years participating in the Kaiser Permanente Health Plan over 5 influenza seasons.
Individuals received LAIV as part of routine care from October 2003 through March 2008. Using Kaiser Permanente databases, rates of medically attended events (MAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) in LAIV recipients were compared with rates in multiple non-randomized control groups which included a self-control group, matched unvaccinated controls, and matched controls vaccinated with inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV).
A total of 21,340, 18,316, and 21,340 subjects received LAIV, TIV and no vaccine, respectively. More than 5500 MAE incidence rate comparisons were performed, and of these, 257 (5%) yielded statistically significant differences with 72 and 185 occurring at a higher and lower rate after LAIV compared with control groups, respectively. The pattern of MAE rate differences did not suggest any safety signal associated with LAIV. There were 47 SAEs noted, and no individual SAE occurred at a significantly higher or lower rate in LAIV recipients relative to control groups in any comparison. Only 2 SAEs (migraine/sinusitis and Bell's palsy) were considered possibly or probably related to LAIV.
The results of this post-licensure evaluation of LAIV safety in individuals 18-49 years of age are consistent with pre- and post-approval clinical studies as well as reports to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, all of which demonstrated no significant adverse outcomes among eligible individuals following receipt of LAIV.

Download full-text


Available from: Ned Lewis, Jun 03, 2015
21 Reads
  • Source
    • "For the analysis of AW events, the term " asthma/reactive airway disease (RAD) " encompassed the individual diagnoses of asthma, cough variant asthma, and exercise-induced asthma; the term " wheezing/shortness of breath (SOB) " included the diagnoses of wheezing and dyspnea/SOB. Detailed methods pertaining to event rates and the determination of statistical significance have been previously described [1] [2]. Post hoc analyses to adjust for multiplicity were conducted using the Bonferroni method. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: In the United States, live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) was initially approved for use in individuals aged 5-49 years in 2003, which was extended to individuals aged 2-49 years in 2007. At that time, a postlicensure commitment was made to describe the safety of LAIV within a cohort of eligible children aged 2-5 years. Methods: A prospective observational postmarketing study was conducted to evaluate the safety of LAIV. Rates of medically attended events (MAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) in eligible children aged 24-59 months receiving LAIV as part of routine care from October 2007 to March 2010 were compared with rates in a within-cohort self-control, as well as matched unvaccinated and matched trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV)-vaccinated controls. Children with asthma and other high-risk medical conditions before vaccination were excluded. All MAEs and SAEs through 42 days postvaccination and all hospitalizations and deaths through 6 months postvaccination were analyzed. Statistical significance was declared without multiplicity adjustment. Results: A total of 28,226 unique LAIV recipients were matched with similar numbers of TIV-vaccinated and unvaccinated children. Of 4696 MAE incidence rate comparisons, 83 (1.8%) were statistically significantly higher and 221 (4.7%) were statistically significantly lower in LAIV recipients versus controls. No pattern of MAE rate differences suggested a safety signal with LAIV. Asthma/wheezing MAEs were not statistically increased in LAIV recipients. No anaphylaxis events occurred within 3 days postvaccination. Rates of SAEs were similar between LAIV and control groups. Conclusions: Results of this postlicensure evaluation of LAIV safety in US children are consistent with preapproval clinical studies and Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System reports, both of which demonstrated no significant increase in asthma/wheezing events or other adverse outcomes among eligible children aged 24-59 months who received LAIV.
    Vaccine 02/2013; 31(14). DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.01.055 · 3.62 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Influenza B is responsible for significant morbidity in children and adults worldwide. For more than 25 years, two antigenically distinct lineages of influenza B viruses, B/Yamagata and B/Victoria, have cocirculated globally. Current influenza vaccine formulations are trivalent and contain two influenza subtype A strains (A/H1N1 and A/H3N2) but only one B strain. In a half of recent influenza seasons, the predominant circulating influenza B lineage was different from that contained in trivalent influenza vaccines. A quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine (Q/LAIV) that contains two B strains, one from each lineage, has been developed to help provide broad protection against influenza B. Q/LAIV was recently approved for use in the USA in eligible individuals 2-49 years of age. This review summarizes clinical trial data in support of Q/LAIV.
    Expert Review of Vaccines 11/2012; 11(11). DOI:10.1586/erv.12.108 · 4.21 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We reviewed cranial nerve palsies, other than VII, that have been reported to the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). We examined patterns for differences in vaccine types, seriousness, age, and clinical characteristics. We identified 68 reports of cranial nerve palsies, most commonly involving the oculomotor (III), trochlear (IV), and abducens (VI) nerves. Isolated cranial nerve palsies, as well as palsies occurring as part of a broader clinical entity, were reported. Forty reports (59%) were classified as serious, suggesting that a cranial nerve palsy may sometimes be the harbinger of a broader and more ominous clinical entity, such as a stroke or encephalomyelitis. There was no conspicuous clustering of live vs. inactivated vaccines. The patient age range spanned the spectrum from infants to the elderly. Independent data may help to clarify whether, when, and to what extent the rates of cranial nerve palsies following particular vaccines may exceed background levels.
    Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics 11/2013; 10(2). DOI:10.4161/hv.27032 · 2.37 Impact Factor
Show more