Article

Effects of Alcohol Retail Privatization on Excessive Alcohol Consumption and Related Harms A Community Guide Systematic Review

Community Guide Branch, Epidemiology and Analysis Program Office, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.
American journal of preventive medicine (Impact Factor: 4.28). 04/2012; 42(4):418-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.01.002
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Excessive alcohol consumption is the third-leading cause of preventable death in the U.S. This systematic review is one in a series exploring effectiveness of interventions to reduce alcohol-related harms.
The focus of this review was on studies evaluating the effects of the privatization of alcohol retail sales on excessive alcohol consumption and related harms. Using Community Guide methods for conducting systematic reviews, a systematic search was conducted in multiple databases up to December 2010. Reference lists of acquired articles and review papers were also scanned for additional studies.
A total of 17 studies assessed the impact of privatizing retail alcohol sales on the per capita alcohol consumption, a well-established proxy for excessive alcohol consumption; 9 of these studies also examined the effects of privatization on the per capita consumption of alcoholic beverages that were not privatized. One cohort study in Finland assessed the impact of privatizing the sales of medium-strength beer (MSB) on self-reported alcohol consumption. One study in Sweden assessed the impact of re-monopolizing the sale of MSB on alcohol-related harms. Across the 17 studies, there was a 44.4% median increase in the per capita sales of privatized beverages in locations that privatized retail alcohol sales (interquartile interval: 4.5% to 122.5%). During the same time period, sales of nonprivatized alcoholic beverages decreased by a median of 2.2% (interquartile interval: -6.6% to -0.1%). Privatizing the sale of MSB in Finland was associated with a mean increase in alcohol consumption of 1.7 liters of pure alcohol per person per year. Re-monopolization of the sale of MSB in Sweden was associated with a general reduction in alcohol-related harms.
According to Community Guide rules of evidence, there is strong evidence that privatization of retail alcohol sales leads to increases in excessive alcohol consumption.

0 Followers
 · 
133 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: AimsTo examine state alcohol control policy implementation by policy efficacy and intent.DesignA descriptive longitudinal analysis of policy implementation.SettingThe United States, 1999-2011.Participants50 states and the District of Columbia.Measurements29 state-level policies were rated based on an implementation rating (IR; range = 0.0-1.0) gathered from the Alcohol Policy Information System, government and industry reports, and other sources; and expert judgment about policy efficacy for addressing binge drinking and alcohol-impaired driving among the general population and youth, respectively. FindingsOn average, implementation of the most effective general population policies did not change (mean IR 0.366 in 1999; 0.375 in 2011; slope for annual change = 0.001; 95% confidence interval for the slope -0.001, 0.002). In contrast, implementation increased over time for less effective policies (mean IR 0.287 in 1999; 0.427 in 2011; slope for annual change compared with most effective policies = 0.009; slope 95% CI 0.002-0.007), youth-oriented policies (mean IR 0.424 in 1999; 0.511 in 2011; slope for annual change compared with most effective policies = 0.007; slope 95% CI 0.005-0.009), and impaired driving policies (mean IR 0.493 in 1999; 0.608 in 2011; slope for annual change compared with most effective policies = 0.0105; slope 95% CI 0.007-0.014).Conclusions Implementation of politically palatable state alcohol policies, such as those targeting youth and alcohol-impaired driving, and less effective policies increased during 1999-2011 in the US, while the most effective policies that may maximally protect public health remained underused.
    Addiction 08/2014; 110(1). DOI:10.1111/add.12706 · 4.60 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: AimsTo examine the associations between alcohol control policies in four regulatory domains with alcohol consumption in low- and middle-income countries (LAMICs), controlling for country-level living standards and drinking patterns.DesignCross-sectional analyses of individual-level alcohol consumption survey data and country-level alcohol policies using multi-level modelingSettingData from 15 LAMICs collected in the Gender, Alcohol, and Culture: an International Study (GENACIS)ParticipantsPersons aged 18-65MeasurementsAlcohol policy data compiled by the World Health Organization; individual-level current drinking status, usual quantity and frequency of drinking, binge drinking frequency, and total drinking volume; Gross Domestic Product based on purchasing power parity (GDP-PPP) per capita; detrimental drinking pattern scale; and age and gender as individual-level covariatesFindingsAlcohol policies regulating the physical availability of alcohol, particularly those concerning business hours or involving a licensing system for off-premises alcohol retail sales, as well as minimum legal drinking age, were the most consistent predictors of alcohol consumption. Aggregate relative alcohol price levels were inversely associated with all drinking variables (p<.05) except drinking volume. Greater restrictions on alcohol advertising, particularly beer advertising, were inversely associated with alcohol consumption (p<.05). Policies that set legal blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limits for drivers and random breath testing to enforce BAC limits were not significantly associated with alcohol consumption.Conclusions Alcohol policies that regulate the physical availability of alcohol are associated with lower alcohol consumption in low- and middle-income countries.
    Addiction 04/2014; 109(7). DOI:10.1111/add.12571 · 4.60 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We examined the influence of price on alcohol brand choice among underage youth. Using a national sample of 1,032 youth, ages 13-20, recruited from a national Internet panel in 2011-2012, we compared differences in mean prices between popular and unpopular brands, examined the association of price and brand popularity using logistic regression, and rank ordered the average price of top brands. Lower brand-specific prices were significantly associated with higher levels of past 30-day consumption prevalence. However, youth did not preferentially consume the cheapest brands. These findings indicate that youth have preferences for certain brands, even if those brands cost more than competing brands. Our study highlights the need for research on the impact of brand-specific alcohol marketing on underage drinking.
    Substance Use &amp Misuse 09/2014; 49(13). DOI:10.3109/10826084.2014.935790 · 1.23 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
16 Downloads
Available from
May 21, 2014