Article

Time-dependent increased risk for serious infection from continuous use of tumor necrosis factor antagonists over three years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan.
Arthritis care & research 03/2012; 64(8):1125-34. DOI: 10.1002/acr.21666
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To investigate associations between continuous treatments with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists and risk for developing serious infections (SIs) over 3 years in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) enrolled in the Registry of Japanese RA Patients for Long-Term Safety (REAL) database.
We analyzed 727 RA patients who had started either infliximab or etanercept (the anti-TNF group; 1,480.1 patient-years [PY]) and 571 RA patients who had started conventional nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (the unexposed group; 1,104.1 PY) at the time of enrollment in the REAL. We assessed the occurrence of SIs within a 3-year observation period, including the period after switching to other TNF antagonists, and all SIs, unlimited to the first one in each patient as reported in other studies, to evaluate the real safety of TNF antagonists in daily practice.
The incidence rate of SIs per 100 PY was 5.54 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 4.44-6.84) in the anti-TNF group and 2.72 (95% CI 1.87-3.83) in the unexposed group. Poisson regression analysis revealed that the relative risk (RR) of continuous use of TNF antagonists for SIs after adjusting for baseline and time-dependent covariates was significantly elevated both overall (1.97, 95% CI 1.25-3.19) and for the first year (2.40, 95% CI 1.20-5.03), but not for the second and third years combined (1.38, 95% CI 0.80-2.43). The adjusted RR for SIs of etanercept compared to infliximab was not significantly elevated.
Continuous anti-TNF therapy was significantly associated with increased risks for developing SIs during, but not after, the first year.

2 Bookmarks
 · 
111 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To update the evidence for the safety of synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (sDMARDs), glucocorticoids (GC) and biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to inform the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of RA. Systematic literature review (SLR) of observational studies (including registries). Interventions were any bDMARD (anakinra, infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, rituximab, abatacept, tocilizumab, golimumab or certolizumab pegol) or sDMARD (methotrexate, leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, gold/auranofin, azathioprine, chlorambucil, chloroquine, cyclosporin, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate, minocycline, penicillamine, tacrolimus or tofacitinib) and a comparator was required. Information on GCs was collected from the included studies. All safety outcomes were included. Forty-nine observational studies addressing diverse safety outcomes of therapy with bDMARDs met eligibility criteria. Substantial heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis of any of the outcomes. Patients on tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) compared to patients on conventional sDMARDs had a higher risk of serious infections (adjusted HR (aHR) 1.1-1.8), a higher risk of tuberculosis, and an increased risk of infection by herpes zoster cannot be excluded. Patients on TNFi did not have an increased risk for malignancies in general, lymphoma or non-melanoma skin cancer, but the risk of melanoma may be slightly increased (aHR 1.5). From the studies identified on conventional sDMARDs, no new safety signals were found. The findings from this SLR confirm the known safety pattern of sDMARDs and bDMARDs for the treatment of RA.
    Annals of the rheumatic diseases 01/2014; · 8.11 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To study the factors associated with withdrawal of the and tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) biologics in the treatment of rheumatic diseases. Data from the Hong Kong Biologics Registry were retrieved. The cumulative rates of withdrawal of different biological agents were studied by Kaplan-Meier plot and the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) was calculated. Factors associated with the withdrawal of the anti-TNFα agents were studied by Cox regression. Between 2005 and 2013, 2059 courses of biologics were used in 1345 patients. After 3454 patient-years, 1171 (57%) courses were terminated because of clinical inefficacy (38.1%), SAEs (22.3%) and financial reasons (15.9%). The most frequent SAEs (per 100-patient-years) were allergy (2.90), serious infections (1.34), tuberculosis (0.93) and infusion/injection site reaction (0.75). Among the anti-TNFα agents, the cumulative probability of drug withdrawal for either inefficacy or SAEs in 5 years was highest with infliximab (IFX) (64.5%), followed by etanercept (ETN) (44.2%) and adalimumab (ADA) (36.9%). The incidence of serious infections and tuberculosis (per 100 patient-years) for IFX, ETN and ADA users was 1.99, 0.85 and 0.63; and 1.68, 0.43 and 0.85, respectively. Infusion/injection site reaction was highest with IFX (1.38/100 patient-years). Cox regression revealed increasing age, female sex, not having a diagnosis of spondyloarthritis (SpA) and IFX use were significantly associated with drug withdrawal for either inefficacy or SAEs. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) had the highest hazard ratio for drug withdrawal but SpA was favorable for drug retention, after adjustment for age, sex, disease duration and the choice of anti-TNFα agents. In our registry, the retention rate of the anti-TNFα agents was lowest but the incidence of tuberculosis, serious infections and infusion reaction was highest with IFX. Older female patients with RA and the use of IFX were independently associated with drug withdrawal.
    International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases 12/2013; · 1.65 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, including methotrexate, may not be tolerated by all patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and limited international data for etanercept (ETN) monotherapy are available. The aim of this review was to summarize the clinical program for ETN monotherapy in Japanese patients with RA, which has included a pharmacokinetic study, clinical trials for registration, long-term studies, and once-weekly dosing studies. Pharmacokinetic results showed that serum concentrations of ETN were linear with dose levels and were similar to other international studies. Across interventional studies, 652 Japanese patients with active RA were treated with ETN. In the registration studies, ETN treatment led to consistent improvement in American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70 scores, European League Against Rheumatism Good Response, Disease Activity Score 28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate remission, and Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index. In the long-term studies, efficacy was maintained for up to 180 weeks. Similar results were seen in the once-weekly studies. Across the studies, more than 870 patient-years of exposure to ETN were recorded. Discontinuations owing to lack of efficacy or adverse events were modest and no new safety signals were recorded. These studies demonstrated that ETN monotherapy is efficacious and well-tolerated in Japanese patients with RA.
    Modern rheumatology / the Japan Rheumatism Association. 05/2014;

Full-text

View
0 Downloads