Article

Responses of fine roots and soil N availability to short-term nitrogen fertilization in a broad-leaved Korean pine mixed forest in northeastern China.

State Key Laboratory of Forest and Soil Ecology, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, China.
PLoS ONE (impact factor: 4.09). 01/2012; 7(3):e31042. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0031042 pp.e31042
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Knowledge of the responses of soil nitrogen (N) availability, fine root mass, production and turnover rates to atmospheric N deposition is crucial for understanding fine root dynamics and functioning in forest ecosystems. Fine root biomass and necromass, production and turnover rates, and soil nitrate-N and ammonium-N in relation to N fertilization (50 kg N ha(-1) year(-1)) were investigated in a temperate forest over the growing season of 2010, using sequential soil cores and ingrowth cores methods. N fertilization increased soil nitrate-N by 16% (P<0.001) and ammonium-N by 6% (P<0.01) compared to control plots. Fine root biomass and necromass in 0-20 cm soil were 13% (4.61 vs. 5.23 Mg ha(-1), P<0.001) and 34% (1.39 vs. 1.86 Mg ha(-1), P<0.001) less in N fertilization plots than those in control plots. The fine root mass was significantly negatively correlated with soil N availability and nitrate-N contents, especially in 0-10 cm soil layer. Both fine root production and turnover rates increased with N fertilization, indicating a rapid underground carbon cycling in environment with high nitrogen levels. Although high N supply has been widely recognized to promote aboveground growth rates, the present study suggests that high levels of nitrogen supply may reduce the pool size of the underground carbon. Hence, we conclude that high levels of atmospheric N deposition will stimulate the belowground carbon cycling, leading to changes in the carbon balance between aboveground and underground storage. The implications of the present study suggest that carbon model and prediction need to take the effects of nitrogen deposition on underground system into account.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
23 Views
  • Article: Review of root dynamics in forest ecosystems grouped by climate, climatic forest type and species
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patterns of both above- and belowground biomass and production were evaluated using published information from 200 individual data-sets. Data sets were comprised of the following types of information: organic matter storage in living and dead biomass (e.g. surface organic horizons and soil organic matter accumulations), above- and belowground net primary production (NPP) and biomass, litter transfers, climatic data (i.e. precipitation and temperature), and nutrient storage (N, P, Ca, K) in above- and belowground biomass, soil organic matter and litter transfers. Forests were grouped by climate, foliage life-span, species and soil order. Several climatic and nutrient variables were regressed against fine root biomass or net primary production to determine what variables were most useful in predicting their dynamics. There were no significant or consistent patterns for above- and belowground biomass accumulation or NPP change across the different climatic forest types and by soil order. Similarly, there were no consistent patterns of soil organic matter (SOM) accumulation by climatic forest type but SOM varied significantly by soil order—the chemistry of the soil was more important in determining the amount of organic matter accumulation than climate. Soil orders which were high in aluminum, iron, and clay (e.g. Ultisols, Oxisols) had high total living and dead organic matter accumulations-especially in the cold temperate zone and in the tropics. Climatic variables and nutrient storage pools (i.e. in the forest floor) successfully predicted fine root NPP but not fine root biomass which was better predicted by nutrients in litterfall. The importance of grouping information by species based on their adaptive strategies for water and nutrient-use is suggested by the data. Some species groups did not appear to be sensitive to large changes in either climatic or nutrient variables while for others these variables explained a large proportion of the variation in fine root biomass and/or NPP.
    Plant and Soil 01/1995; 187(2):159-219. · 2.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Fine root production and turnover across a complex edaphic gradient of a Pinus palustris-Aristida stricta savanna ecosystem
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fine root dynamics significantly affect plant performance through soil resource capture, and ecosystem function through soil carbon and nitrogen cycling. The responses of fine roots to natural gradients in resource availability, however, are poorly understood. We assessed fine root dynamics across a soil texture gradient in Pinus palustris Mill.-Aristida stricta Michx. savannas. These savannas are currently the subject of considerable conservation and restoration efforts in the southeastern US. Fine root dynamics were determined for two growing seasons in three soil types with minirhizotrons. The soils were characterized as: shallow, loamy soils; intermediate depth sandy soils; and deep, sandy soils. Although soil moisture was not quantified in this study, increasing drainage capacity and clear shifts to xerophytic vegetation strongly suggest increasing soil moisture limitation from shallow to deep soils. Potential net N mineralization, microbial biomass and annual overstory litterfall were also characterized across the gradient. Consistent with increasing soil moisture limitation, fine root production increased and diameters decreased from shallow to deep sands, as did the amount of deep root production. Litterfall also declined across this gradient. In contrast, fine root turnover rates were highest in the intermediate soils where nitrogen availability was highest. These results suggest that fine root turnover rate may vary independently of annual fine root production and these components may differentially respond to multiple limiting resources. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
    Forest Ecology and Management. 189(1-3):397-406.
  • Source
    Article: Nitrogen fixation: Anthropogenic enhancement-environmental
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the absence of hwnan activities, biotic fiXation is the primary source of reactive N, providing about 90-130 Tg N yr-l (Tg -1012 g) on the continents. Hwnan activities have resulted in the fiXation of an additional::: 140 Tg N yr-l by energy produc-tion (:::20 Tg N yr-l), fertilizer production (:::80 Tg N yr-l), and cultivation of crops (e.g., legwnes, rice) (:::40 Tg N yr-l). We can only account for part of this anthropogenic N. N20 is accwnulatin~ in the atmosphere at a rate of 3 Tg N yr-l. Coastal oceans receive another 41 Tg N yr-via rivers, much of which is buried or denitrified. Open oceans receive 18 Tg N yr-l by atmospheric deposition, which is incorporated into oceanic N pools (e.g., NOj, NV' The remaining 80 Tg N yr-l are either retained on continents in groundwater, soils, or vegetation or denitrified to N2. Field studies and calculations indi-cate that uncertainties about the size of each sink can account for the remaining anthro-pogenic N. Thus although anthropogenic N is clearly accwnulating on continents, we do not know rates of individual processes. We predict the anthropogenic N-fixation rate will increase by about 60% by the year 2020, primarily due to increased fertilizer use and fossil-fuel combustion. About two-thirds of the increase will occur in Asia, which by 2020 will account for over half of the global anthropogenic N fiXation.
    01/1995;

Full-text

View
1 Download
Available from

Keywords

aboveground growth rates
 
atmospheric N deposition
 
belowground carbon cycling
 
carbon model
 
control plots
 
forest ecosystems
 
growing season
 
ingrowth cores methods
 
N fertilization
 
N fertilization plots
 
nitrate-N contents
 
nitrogen deposition
 
rapid underground carbon cycling
 
sequential soil cores
 
soil nitrogen
 
temperate forest
 
turnover rates
 
underground carbon
 
underground storage
 
understanding fine