Article

Racial/Ethnic Harassment and Discrimination, Its Antecedents, and Its Effect on Job-Related Outcomes

Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, USA.
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology (Impact Factor: 2.07). 01/2012; 17(1):65-78. DOI: 10.1037/a0026430
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A general model of workplace prejudice acts, their antecedents, and their consequences is proposed and examined in the context of racial/ethnic harassment and discrimination (REHD). Antecedents proposed and tested here include context and climate, whereas consequences proposed and tested here include work, supervisor, and opportunity satisfaction and turnover intentions. The theoretical model is first tested and cross-validated in two ethnically diverse subsamples (approximately 2,000 each). Then, hierarchical multigroup modeling was conducted to determine whether the relationships among REHD, its antecedents, and its outcomes are equivalent across five racial/ethnic groups (N = 1,000 per group) in the U.S. military. This addresses the issue of differential exposure (i.e., varying amounts of stressors across groups) versus differential vulnerability (i.e., discrepant impact of a stressor on outcomes across groups) across racial/ethnic groups. Consistent with expectations, results suggest that although racial/ethnic groups differ in their mean exposure to REHD, the relationships among REHD and its outcomes are the same across race/ethnicity, supporting the differential exposure view. In addition, the results show some differences between antecedents and REHD across race/ethnicity.

2 Bookmarks
 · 
182 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose Proactive strategies for avoiding stigmatization may prevent work-related discrimination (Singletary and Hebl J Appl Psychol 94:797–805, 2009), yet these strategies may also cause strain in the stigmatized. We tested a model in which previous workplace discrimination experiences and anticipated future workplace discrimination related to proactive responses (compensatory behaviors and concealing behaviors), which, in turn, related to job tension. Design/Methodology/Approach Survey data were obtained from 332 workers with chronic illnesses. Structural equation modeling was used to test the proposed relationships. Findings Perceived previous discrimination directly related to anticipated future discrimination and indirectly related to compensatory and concealing behaviors. Anticipated discrimination directly related to compensatory and concealing behaviors, and indirectly related to job tension through compensatory behaviors. Compensatory behaviors were, but concealing behaviors were not, related to job tension. Implications Workers with chronic illness should be educated on ways to mitigate the negative effects of compensatory behaviors, including ensuring adequate opportunities to replenish resources. Organizations should provide assistance to these workers through Employee Assistance Programs or other types of job counseling. Organization leaders and supervisors have a responsibility to build an environment of acceptance for those with chronic illness in order to reduce potential discrimination. Originality/Value While proactive strategies are effective in reducing negative outcomes of stigmatization, little research has explored their potential downsides. We highlight the “double-edged sword” nature of compensatory behaviors. In addition, while a large proportion of U.S. workers are managing chronic illness, this population is understudied.
    Journal of Business and Psychology 09/2013; 29(3):427-442. DOI:10.1007/s10869-013-9324-7 · 1.25 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose ‐ The purpose of this paper is to introduce the concept of discriminatory job loss (DJL), which occurs when discrimination and job loss intersect. The paper aims to discuss the antecedents and consequences of DJL and calls for research on the topic. Design/methodology/approach ‐ Diversity and careers research from management, psychology, economics, and sociology literatures on discrimination, job loss, and unemployment are examined. Findings ‐ Discriminatory job loss involves discriminatory termination, discriminatory layoff, retaliatory termination, and constructive discharge and exacerbates negative outcomes of discrimination or job loss alone. Antecedents to DJL are the external and internal environments. DJL affects unemployment duration and reemployment quality and targets self-esteem, self-efficacy, and perceived control. Social implications ‐ When large numbers of people experience DJL and long unemployment durations and lower re-employment quality, this affects the individuals as well as society. In times of high employment, when jobs are scarce, individuals have fewer employment options and employers have more freedom to engage in discrimination. Having large groups of people know that their ability to maintain employment is negatively affected by their demographic group membership while others know that their demographic membership provides employment privileges can result in long-term negative individual, organizational, and societal consequences. Originality/value ‐ This paper brings attention to, and calls for research on, DJL and its negative consequences.
    Journal of Managerial Psychology 08/2013; 28(6). DOI:10.1108/JMP-10-2012-0319 · 1.25 Impact Factor
  • Industrial and Organizational Psychology 03/2013; 6(1). DOI:10.1111/iops.12010 · 0.65 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
132 Downloads
Available from
May 31, 2014