Article

The difference of glucostatic parameters according to the remission of diabetes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews (Impact Factor: 2.97). 03/2012; 28(5):439-46. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.2297
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Gut hormones play a role in diabetes remission after a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Our aim was to investigate differences in gut hormone secretion according to diabetes remission after surgery. Second, we aimed to identify differences in insulin secretion and sensitivity according to diabetes remission after RYGB.
Twenty-two severely obese patients with type 2 diabetes underwent RYGB. A meal tolerance test (MTT) was performed 12 months after RYGB. The secretions of active glucagon-like peptide-1 (active GLP-1), glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP), peptide YY, C-peptide and insulin during the MTT test were calculated using total area under the curve values (AUC). Remission was defined as glycated haemoglobin (A(1C)) of <6.5% and a fasting glucose concentration of <126 mg/dL for 1 year or more without active pharmacological therapy.
Of the 22 patients, 16 (73%) had diabetes remission (remission group). The secretion CURVES of active GLP-1, GIP and peptide YY were not different between the groups. AUC of insulin and C-peptide were also not different. Homeostasis model assessment estimate of insulin resistance was significantly lower (1.26 ± 1.05 versus 2.37 ± 1.08, p = 0.006), and Matsuda index of insulin sensitivity was significantly higher in the remission group (10.5 ± 6.2 versus 5.8 ± 2.1, p = 0.039). The disposition index (functional reserve of beta cells) was significantly higher in the remission group compared with that in the non-remission group (5.34 ± 2.74 versus 1.83 ± 0.70, p < 0.001).
Remission of diabetes after RYGB is not associated with a difference in gut hormone secretion. Patients remaining diabetic had higher insulin resistance and decreased β cell functional reserve.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
113 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the effect of gastrectomy on diabetes control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and early gastric cancer. Data from 64 patients with early gastric cancer and type 2 diabetes mellitus were prospectively collected. All patients underwent curative gastrectomy (36 subtotal gastrectomy with gastroduodenostomy, 16 subtotal gastrectomy with gastrojejunostomy, 12 total gastrectomy) and their physical and laboratory data were evaluated before and 3, 6 and 12 mo after surgery. Fasting blood glucose (FBS), HbA1c, insulin, C-peptide, and homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance were significantly improved 3 mo after surgery, regardless of operation type, and the significant improvement in all measured values, except HbA1c, was sustained up to 12 mo postoperatively. Approximately 3.1% of patients stopped diabetes medication and had HbA1c < 6.0% and FBS < 126 mg/dL. 54.7% of patients decreased their medication, and had reduced FBS or HbA1c. In multivariate analysis, good diabetic control was not associated with operation type, but was associated with diabetes duration. Diabetes improved in more than 50% of patients during the first year after gastric cancer surgery. The degree of diabetes control was related to diabetes duration.
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 12/2013; 19(48):9410-7. · 2.55 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a disorder of elevated intracranial pressure due to an unknown cause. In most cases, IIH can be managed with medical therapy and weight reduction. Surgical treatment of IIH is reserved for patients who cannot tolerate medical therapy, are nonadherent to medical therapy, develop progressive symptoms despite maximal medical therapy, or present with fulminant visual loss. To date, there has been no randomized controlled trial to evaluate the surgical treatment of IIH, and our current knowledge of the efficacy and complications of these procedures is based on retrospective and observational studies. This review discusses the indications for surgical intervention in IIH and provides an overview of the recently published data on the efficacy and complications of these interventions. A surgical management algorithm is also presented to guide the clinician when evaluating a patient with IIH.
    Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 03/2014; 14(3):438. · 3.78 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Diabesity is a term often used to indicate the association of type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with obesity; the prevalence of both conditions is rapidly increasing worldwide and has reached epidemic proportions. Insulin resistance represents the major determinant of T2DM, which becomes manifest once relative β-cell failure ensues and insulin secretion is no longer sufficient to compensate for insulin resistance. In recent years, gastrointestinal surgery has emerged as the most effective option for the treatment of obesity and diabetes, with level-1 evidence of diabetes remission. Restrictive gastric operations such as gastric banding can improve insulin resistance in proportion to weight loss, while gastrointestinal bypass procedures, such as roux-en-y gastric-bypass (RYGB) and biliopancreatic diversion (BPD), can improve glucose homeostasis even before a significant weight loss is reached, suggesting weight-independent mechanisms of action. Studies comparing RYGB to BPD show that RYGB primarily enhances insulin secretion and reduces hepatic glucose output, whereas BPD rapidly improves glycemia primarily through the normalization of insulin sensitivity. Given the fact that BPD involves a significantly longer bypass of the proximal intestine than RYGB, these data suggest that the exclusion of a greater length of small bowel from the transit of food may cause broader and more profound influence on insulin sensitivity.
    Current Atherosclerosis Reports 09/2012; 14(6). · 2.92 Impact Factor