A systematic critical review on MRI in spondyloarthritis

Research Department, Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, Hospital Lillebaelt, Clinical Locomotion Network, Oestre Hougvej 55, Middelfart 5500, Denmark. .
Arthritis research & therapy (Impact Factor: 4.12). 03/2012; 14(2):R55. DOI: 10.1186/ar3768
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been proven capable of showing inflammatory and structural changes in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and has become widely used in the diagnosis of SpA. Despite this, no systematic reviews evaluate the diagnostic utility of MRI for SpA. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review was to determine the evidence for the utility of MRI in the clinical diagnosis of SpA. The aims were to identify which MRI findings are associated with the diagnosis of SpA and to quantify this association.
MEDLINE and EMBASE were electronically searched. Inclusion criteria were cross-sectional or longitudinal case-control or cohort MRI studies. The studies required a group with either SpA or inflammatory back pain (IBP) and a non-case group without SpA or IBP. Each group required a minimum of 20 participants. The included articles had to report results containing raw numbers suitable for the construction of two-by-two tables or report results by sensitivity and specificity for cross-sectional studies or odds ratios, relative risk ratios, or likelihood ratios for longitudinal studies. Method quality was assessed by using criteria based on the QUADAS tool.
In total, 2,395 articles were identified in MEDLINE and EMBASE before November 2011. All articles were reviewed by title and abstract. Seventy-seven articles were reviewed by full text, and 10 met the inclusion criteria. Two were considered of high quality: one evaluated the sacroiliac joints, and the other, the spine. Because of the small number of high-quality studies, a meta-analysis was not performed. The two high-quality studies found a positive association between MRI findings (bone marrow edema, erosions, fat infiltrations, global assessment of sacroiliitis, and ankylosis) and the diagnosis of IBP and SpA.
In this review, several MRI findings were found to be associated with SpA. However, because of the small number of high-quality studies, the evidence for the utility of MRI in the diagnosis of SpA must be considered limited. Therefore, caution should be taken to ensure that inflammatory and structural MRI findings are not interpreted as being more specific for SpA than is supported by research.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease involving the spine and peripheral joints, and extra-articular manifestations such as uveitis, psoriasis and bowel inflammation. The treatment goals for SpA are maintenance of physical function, control of disease activity and prevention of radiographic progression. However, unlike the well-established treat-to-target (T2T) guidance in rheumatoid arthritis, the T2T concept for treating SpA is still immature. Clinical evidence of T2T in SpA is still lacking. To develop evidence of T2T in SpA, several research agendas need to be accomplished. Firstly, a well-accepted measureable treatment target needs to be defined through expert consensus. Secondly, a T2T treatment algorithm for monitoring disease activity and adjusting therapies needs to be generated. Finally, well-designed comparative clinical trials to compare this T2T strategy with the current standard of treatment should be conducted to demonstrate long-term benefits and risks. In SpA clinical trials, T2T comparative studies should have a clear disease definition for enrollment of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis, axial SpA or non-radiographic axial SpA. Endpoints should be assessment with AS International Working Group criteria for 20 % improvement (ASAS20), ASAS40, and the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) with inactive and moderate disease activity at month 3. Long-term efficacy endpoints such as the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS) of radiographic progression and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) score at 2 years are encouraged. More sensitive assessment tools to detect structural damage and new bone formation, such as low-radiation computerized tomography (CT), are promising.
    Drugs 06/2014; 74(10). DOI:10.1007/s40265-014-0246-0 · 4.13 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Canadian Rheumatology Association (CRA) and the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) have collaborated to update the recommendations for the management of spondyloarthritis (SpA). A working group was assembled and consisted of the SPARCC executive committee, rheumatologist leaders from SPARCC collaborating sites, Canadian rheumatologists from across the country with an interest in SpA (both academic and community), a rheumatology trainee with an interest in SpA, an epidemiologist/health services researcher, a member of the CRA executive, a member of the CRA therapeutics committee, and a patient representative from the Canadian Spondylitis Association. An extensive review was conducted of literature published from 2007 to 2014 involving the management of SpA. The working group created draft recommendations using multiple rounds of Web-based surveys and an in-person conference. A survey was sent to the membership of the CRA to obtain an extended review that was used to finalize the recommendations. Guidelines for the management of SpA were created. Part I focuses on the principles of management of SpA in Canada and includes 6 general management principles, 5 ethical considerations, target groups for treatment recommendations, 2 wait time recommendations, and recommendations for disease monitoring. Also included are 6 modifications for application to juvenile SpA. These recommendations were developed based on current literature and applied to a Canadian healthcare context. It is hoped that the implementation of these recommendations will promote best practices in the treatment of SpA.
    The Journal of Rheumatology 02/2015; DOI:10.3899/jrheum.141000 · 3.17 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Both MRI and plain radiography are used to assess sacroiliitis. A weakness of radiography - apart from its inability to detect early disease - is reader variability. On the contrary, experience with MRI is relatively limited by comparison. This review summarizes recent advances in sacroiliac joint imaging using radiography and MRI in spondyloarthritis. Observer variation in reading radiographs of sacroiliac joints remains an unresolved issue. In recent years, more studies on MRI in the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis have become available. Incorporating structural lesions in the sacroiliac joint and spine and inflammatory lesions in the spine in the definition of a positive MRI are hot topics in research.
    Current opinion in rheumatology 05/2014; DOI:10.1097/BOR.0000000000000066 · 5.07 Impact Factor

Full-text (3 Sources)

Available from
Jun 4, 2014