Analysis of self-recording in self-management interventions for stereotypy

University of Houston-Clear Lake, Houston, Texas 77058, USA.
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (Impact Factor: 1.19). 03/2012; 45(1):55-68. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-55
Source: PubMed


Most treatments for stereotypy involve arrangements of antecedent or consequent events that are imposed entirely by a therapist. By contrast, results of some studies suggest that self-recording, a common component of self-management interventions, might be an effective and efficient way to reduce stereotypy. Because the procedure typically has included instructions to refrain from stereotypy, self-recording of the absence of stereotypy, and differential reinforcement of accurate recording, it is unclear which element or combination of elements produces reductions in stereotypy. We conducted a component analysis of a self-management intervention and observed that decreases in stereotypy might be attributable to instructional control or to differential reinforcement, but that self-recording per se had little effect on stereotypy.

Download full-text


Available from: Jennifer N Fritz, Sep 29, 2014
26 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Stereotyped behaviors are prominent in both the ASD and ID populations; stereotypies can impede social skill acquisition, interfere with learning, and adversely affect an individual's quality of life. The current study explored the effect of cognitive skills and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) on the rate of stereotypies in 2019 children aged 17–39 months. Cognitive abilities were assessed using the cognitive developmental quotient (DQ) on the Battelle Developmental Inventory, Second Edition (BDI-2); two levels of cognitive skill were used: (1) low (cognitive DQ less than or equal to 70), and (2) typical (cognitive DQ greater than 70). Stereotypies were examined utilizing the Baby and Infant Screen for Children with aUtIsm Traits, Part 3 (BISCUIT-Part 3). Children with ASD were found to have greater rates of overall stereotyped behaviors compared to children with atypical development, regardless of cognitive level; however, children with ASD and typical cognitive ability evinced the highest rate of stereotypies. An examination of specific stereotyped behaviors (i.e., unusual play with objects, repeated and unusual vocalizations, repeated and unusual body movements) revealed disparate results. Research and clinical implications regarding these findings are discussed.
    Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 05/2014; 8(5):502–508. DOI:10.1016/j.rasd.2014.01.008 · 2.96 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Stereotyped, repetitive, ritualistic, obsessive, and compulsive behaviors are a common feature for many individuals with autism, and multiple topographies of such behavior exist. Previous reviews have discussed treatments for stereotypy and repetitive behaviors; however, to date, none have systematically evaluated the efficacy of such treatments. An abundance of treatments based on the principles of applied behavior analysis exist within the literature; however, many assume that stereotypy is maintained by automatic reinforcement. The current review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of treatments for stereotypy across disciplines including behavioral, pharmacological, and sensory-based therapies. Furthermore, this review compares the efficacy of function-based and nonfunction-based treatments for stereotypy.
    06/2014; 1(2):143-164. DOI:10.1007/s40489-014-0015-8
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In 2009 the National Autism Center published its initial National Standards Project (NSP) report detailing a list of existing treatments for individuals with autism. Recently, the report was updated and was made available to the public in April 2015. The 2015 report divided treatments into three categories: established, emerging, and unestablished. Among the 11 treatments identified as established, self-management interventions for children with autism were included. Although self-management was found to be effective, the NSP did not evaluate the extent to which this treatment has been studied in natural settings versus clinical/laboratory and mixed settings, nor the social validity of the treatments. Having knowledge on the effectiveness of a treatment in the natural setting and its social validity can assist teachers and parents in making better decisions regarding the adoption of a treatment. The purpose of this review is to extend the NSP report by evaluating the social validity of self-management interventions for individuals with autism, evaluate the extent to which these interventions have been conducted in the natural setting (as opposed to a clinical setting), and to provide a second evaluation of the methodological quality of these studies. Results of this review suggest that, self-management interventions for children with autism are effective in natural, clinical, and mixed settings. However, few studies have provided a formal evaluation of social validity. There are also some limitations to the methodological quality of the studies that should be considered for future research.
    Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 07/2015; 18:34-50. DOI:10.1016/j.rasd.2015.07.001 · 2.96 Impact Factor