Article

Mobile phone use and glioma risk: comparison of epidemiological study results with incidence trends in the United States

Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20852-7238, USA.
BMJ (online) (Impact Factor: 16.38). 03/2012; 344:e1147. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e1147
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In view of mobile phone exposure being classified as a possible human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), we determined the compatibility of two recent reports of glioma risk (forming the basis of the IARC's classification) with observed incidence trends in the United States.
Comparison of observed rates with projected rates of glioma incidence for 1997-2008. We estimated projected rates by combining relative risks reported in the 2010 Interphone study and a 2011 Swedish study by Hardell and colleagues with rates adjusted for age, registry, and sex; data for mobile phone use; and various latency periods.
US population based data for glioma incidence in 1992-2008, from 12 registries in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) programme (Atlanta, Detroit, Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Jose-Monterey, Seattle, rural Georgia, Connecticut, Hawaii, Iowa, New Mexico, and Utah).
Data for 24,813 non-Hispanic white people diagnosed with glioma at age 18 years or older.
Age specific incidence rates of glioma remained generally constant in 1992-2008 (-0.02% change per year, 95% confidence interval -0.28% to 0.25%), a period coinciding with a substantial increase in mobile phone use from close to 0% to almost 100% of the US population. If phone use was associated with glioma risk, we expected glioma incidence rates to be higher than those observed, even with a latency period of 10 years and low relative risks (1.5). Based on relative risks of glioma by tumour latency and cumulative hours of phone use in the Swedish study, predicted rates should have been at least 40% higher than observed rates in 2008. However, predicted glioma rates based on the small proportion of highly exposed people in the Interphone study could be consistent with the observed data. Results remained valid if we used either non-regular users or low users of mobile phones as the baseline category, and if we constrained relative risks to be more than 1.
Raised risks of glioma with mobile phone use, as reported by one (Swedish) study forming the basis of the IARC's re-evaluation of mobile phone exposure, are not consistent with observed incidence trends in US population data, although the US data could be consistent with the modest excess risks in the Interphone study.

Full-text

Available from: Mark P Little, Jul 22, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
128 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Gliomas make up approximately 30% of all brain and central nervous system tumors and 80% of all malignant brain tumors. Despite the frequency of gliomas, the etiology of these tumors remains largely unknown. Diffuse gliomas, including astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas, belong to a single pathologic class but have very different histologies and molecular etiologies. Recent genomic studies have identified separate molecular subtypes within the glioma classification that appear to correlate with biological etiology, prognosis, and response to therapy. The discovery of these subtypes suggests that molecular genetic tests are and will be useful, beyond classical histology, for the clinical classification of gliomas. While a familial susceptibility to glioma has been identified, only a small percentage of gliomas are thought to be due to single-gene hereditary cancer syndromes. Through the use of linkage studies and genome-wide association studies, multiple germline variants have been identified that are beginning to define the genetic susceptibility to glioma.
    Cancer Genetics 12/2012; 205(12). DOI:10.1016/j.cancergen.2012.10.009 · 2.42 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Gliomas are important because they affect disproportionately high numbers of people of working age and have a poor prognosis. Neurosurgeons were concerned about a possible recent cluster of glioma cases in a northwestern region in England.Methods All patients aged 18-89 years in Lancashire and South Cumbria with a histologically confirmed glioma diagnosed at the Royal Preston Hospital between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2010, were ascertained. Clinical information was extracted from hospital records. Completeness of case referral to Royal Preston Hospital was checked against the National Cancer Registry and National Brain Tumour Registry records for the same period. For a comprehensive assessment of regional incidence, age-standardized incidence rates of all gliomas diagnosed in adults (aged 15 years and older) in the study area were then compared with those for the North West region and England as a whole. Rates for the North West region in defined small area-units ("Middle Super Output Areas") were also investigated to assess any small-area variation in the region during the decade to 2010.ResultsThere were 435 glioma patients from Lancashire and South Cumbria diagnosed at the Royal Preston Hospital between 2006 and 2010, with case ascertainment verified to be complete by the National Cancer Registration Service. The age-standardized incidence rate of gliomas in the study area was 7.10 per 100 000 in 2006-2010, which was minimally different from the rate for all cancer networks in England over the 10 years from 2001. Small-area analysis confirmed lack of major variation in glioma rates in the North West region of England.Conclusion Glioma incidence rates in England have remained stable by region and over time during the last decade.
    Neuro-Oncology 01/2014; DOI:10.1093/neuonc/not301 · 5.29 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Glioblastoma (GB) is one of the most lethal forms of cancer, with an invasive growth pattern that requires the use of adjuvant therapies, including chemotherapy and radiation, to prolong survival. Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral chemotherapy with a limited side effect profile that has become the standard of care in GB treatment. While TMZ has made an impact on survival, tumor recurrence and TMZ resistance remain major challenges. Molecular markers, such as O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase methylation status, can be helpful in predicting tumor response to TMZ, and therefore guides clinical decision making. This review will discuss the epidemiology and possible genetic underpinnings of GB, how TMZ became the standard of care for GB patients, the pharmacology of TMZ, the practical aspects of using TMZ in clinic, and how molecular diagnostics - particularly the use of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase status - affect clinical management.
    Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 01/2013; 5:1-9. DOI:10.2147/CPAA.S26586