Article

Cost-effectiveness of ranibizumab in treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DME) causing visual impairment: Evidence from the RESTORE trial

Centre for Vision Research, Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead Hospital, Hawkesbury Rd, Westmead, 2145 Australia.
The British journal of ophthalmology (Impact Factor: 2.81). 03/2012; 96(5):688-93. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300726
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ranibizumab as either monotherapy or combined with laser therapy, compared with laser monotherapy, in the treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DME) causing visual impairment from a UK healthcare payer perspective.
A Markov model simulated long-term outcomes and costs of treating DME in one eye (BCVA ≤75 letters) based on data from the RESTORE Phase III trial. Outcomes measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were simulated for a 15-year time horizon based on 12-month follow-up from RESTORE and published long-term data. Costs included treatment, disease monitoring, visual impairment and blindness (at 2010 price levels).
Ranibizumab monotherapy resulted in a 0.17 QALY gain at an incremental cost of £4191 relative to laser monotherapy, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £24 028. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed a 64% probability of being cost-effective at a threshold of £30 000 per QALY. Combined ranibizumab and laser therapy resulted in a 0.13 QALY gain at an incremental cost of £4695 relative to laser monotherapy (ICER £36 106; 42% probability of ICER <£30 000).
Based on RESTORE 1-year follow-up data, ranibizumab monotherapy appears to be cost-effective relative to laser monotherapy, the current standard of care. Cost-effectiveness of combination therapy is less certain. Ongoing studies will further inform on disease progression and the need for additional ranibizumab treatment.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Paul Mitchell, Feb 17, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
203 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since the year 2000, the amount written about the economics of blindness and visual impairment has increased substantially. In some cases, the studies listed under this heading are calculations of the costs related to vision impairment and blindness at a national or global level; in other cases the studies examine the cost-effectiveness of strategies to prevent or modify visual impairment or blindness that are intended to be applied as a guide to treatment recommendations and coverage decisions. In each case the references are just examples of many that could be cited. These important studies have helped advocates, policy makers, practitioners, educators, and others interested in eye and vision health to understand the magnitude of the impact that visual impairment and blindness have on the world, regions, nations, and individuals and the tradeoffs that need to be made to limit the impact. However, these studies only begin to tap into the insights that economic logic might offer to those interested in this field. This paper presents multiple case studies that demonstrate that the economics of blindness and visual impairment encompasses much more than simply measures of the burden of the condition. Case studies demonstrating the usefulness of economic insight include analysis of the prevention of conditions that lead to impairment, decisions about refractive error and presbyopia, decisions about disease and injury treatment, decisions about behavior among those with uncorrectable impairment, and decisions about how to regulate the market all have important economic inputs.
    Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 09/2012; 60(5):406-10. DOI:10.4103/0301-4738.100535 · 0.93 Impact Factor
  • Source
    25 Perguntas & Respostas : Retinopatia Diabética- Novo paradigma de Cuidados, GER- Grupo de Estudos da Retina Portugal edited by Henriques J, Nascimento J, Silva F, coordenadores, 11/2012: chapter 21: pages 131-139;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Diabetic macular oedema (DMO) is a common complication of diabetic retinopathy. The retina at the macula thickens and this can cause gradual loss of central vision. Grid or focal laser photocoagulation is effective in treating DMO and has been used for several years, but vision is rarely improved. Antiangiogenic therapy with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) modalities has recently been proposed to try to improve vision in people with DMO. Anti-VEGF drugs are delivered by an injection in the vitreous cavity of the eye and need to be repeated for maintenance. We included 11 studies in this review comparing intravitreal antiangiogenic therapy with sham, laser photocoagulation or investigating its effect when added to photocoagulation. About one in five or seven more people gained a good amount of vision, i.e. 3 lines, using antiangiogenic therapy compared with laser, using seven to 10 intraocular injections in the first year, and two in the second year. Little is known about treatment needs beyond this term. Two related UK-based economic evaluations disagreed on whether ranibizumab was cost-effective compared with laser photocoagulation. The evaluation finding ranibizumab not cost-effective was revised while this review was being updated, leading the UK National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) to recommend ranibizumab for patients with visual impairment and more severe oedema on optical coherence tomography. Antiangiogenic treatment was well tolerated in these studies, but since all studies were short- or medium-term, we were unable to investigate long-term effects as well as risks.
    Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) 12/2012; 12(12). DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD007419.pub3 · 5.70 Impact Factor
Show more