Repeat transrectal ultrasound biopsies with additional targeted cores according to results of functional prostate MRI detects high-risk prostate cancer in patients with previous negative biopsy and increased PSA - A pilot study

Department of Urology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Anticancer research (Impact Factor: 1.83). 03/2012; 32(3):1087-92.
Source: PubMed


Patients with previous negative transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS-GB) and persistently increased prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value represent a great diagnostic problem. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy demonstrates high prostate cancer detection rates in these patients if functional MRI is suspicious for prostate cancer. However, MRI-guided biopsy is not commonly available and features considerable technical requirements. This was a pilot study to investigate if a standard repeat TRUS-GB, with additional targeted cores to suspicious lesions on functional MRI, can achieve similar detection rates as compared to MRI-guided biopsy.
3 Tesla functional MRI was performed in 58 patients with ≥1 previous negative biopsy, persistently increased PSA ≥4 ng/ml and unsuspicious digital rectal examination. Suspicious lesions were marked on a localization map to enable their finding on TRUS. Random TRUS-GB with additional targeted cores according to the functional MRI findings were performed in patients with ≥1 suspicious lesion.
In 37.9% (22/58), functional MRI demonstrated suspicious findings. Out of these 22 patients, 16 underwent TRUS-GB with additional targeted cores. Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 68.8% (11/16). Eight out of these 11 patients subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy and all tumors fulfilled criteria for high-risk prostate cancer. With a median follow-up of 49.1 weeks neither significant PSA increase nor prostate cancer was detected in patients with normal functional MRI findings.
Our approach enables excellent detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with ≥1 previous negative biopsy and persistently increased PSA levels. Due to the current disadvantages of MRI-guided biopsy, our approach therefore represents an excellent alternative to MRI-guided biopsy.

8 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Transrectal ultrasound and ultrasound guided prostate biopsy is the current standard for detecting prostate cancer. Newer techniques such as elastography and contrast enhanced ultrasound may help in lesion detection and monitoring. Advances are occurring in several areas including multiparametric MRI, understanding of the nature of prostate cancer and new therapies including focal therapy and active surveillance. These changes are creating an increasing role for targeted biopsies following MRI and for use of MRI for treatment monitoring.
    Radiologic Clinics of North America 11/2012; 50(6):1061-73. DOI:10.1016/j.rcl.2012.08.007 · 1.98 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) accuracy in prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis in men submitted to saturation prostate biopsy (SPBx) was evaluated. Materials and methods: From June 2011 to December 2012, 78 patients (median 63 years) underwent repeat SPBx (median 28 cores). Multiparametric MRI using a 3 Tesla pelvic phased-array coil was performed before SPBx and lesions suspicious for PCa were submitted to additional targeted biopsies. Results: A T1c PCa was found in 32 (41%) cases. SPBx vs. MRI-suspicious targeted biopsy diagnosed 28 (87.5%) vs. 26 (81.2%) PCa missing four (12.5%) and six (18.8%) cancers localized in the anterior zone and in the lateral margin of the prostate, respectively; moreover, MRI diameter lesions correlated with PCa diagnosis and Gleason score (p<0.05). Conclusion: Multiparametric MRI improved SPBx accuracy in diagnosing PCa of the anterior zone; moreover, suspicious areas >10 mm resulted as highly predictive of cancer (about 70% of the cases).
    Anticancer research 03/2013; 33(3):1195-1199. · 1.83 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: To compare biopsy performance of two approaches for multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR)-targeted biopsy (TB) with that of extended systematic biopsy (SB) in prostate cancer (PCa) detection. Materials and methods: This institutional review board-approved multicenter prospective study (May 2009 to January 2011) included 95 patients with informed consent who were suspected of having PCa, with a suspicious abnormality (target) at prebiopsy MR. Patients underwent 12-core SB and four-core TB with transrectal ultrasonographic (US) guidance, with two cores aimed visually (cognitive TB [TB-COG]) and two cores aimed using transrectal US-MR fusion software (fusion-guided TB [TB-FUS]). SB and TB positivity for cancer and sampling quality (mean longest core cancer length, Gleason score) were compared. Clinically significant PCa was any 3 mm or greater core cancer length or any greater than 3 Gleason pattern for SB or any cancer length for TB. Statistical analysis included t test, paired χ(2) test, and κ statistic. Primary end point (core cancer length) was calculated (paired t test). Results: Among 95 patients (median age, 65 years; mean prostate-specific antigen level, 10.05 ng/mL [10.05 μg/L]), positivity rate for PCa was 59% (n = 56) for SB and 69% (n = 66) for TB (P = .033); rate for clinically significant PCa was 52% (n = 49) for SB and 67% (n = 64) for TB (P = .0011). Cancer was diagnosed through TB in 16 patients (17%) with negative SB results. Mean longest core cancer lengths were 4.6 mm for SB and 7.3 mm for TB (P < .0001). In 12 of 51 (24%) MR imaging targets with positive SB and TB results, TB led to Gleason score upgrading. In 79 MR imaging targets, positivity for cancer was 47% (n = 37) with TB-COG and 53% (n = 42) with TB-FUS (P = .16). Neither technique was superior for Gleason score assessment. Conclusion: Prebiopsy MR imaging combined with transrectal US-guided TB increases biopsy performance in detecting PCa, especially clinically significant PCa. No significant difference was observed between TB-FUS and TB-COG for TB guidance.
    Radiology 04/2013; 268(2). DOI:10.1148/radiol.13121501 · 6.87 Impact Factor
Show more