"This agent is getting the control regarding to the conflicting activity. For example, suppose that the goto agent has a utility value of 0.5, the gothrough agent of 0.3 and the avoid agent of 0.7; being 0.7 the higher value, the avoid agent takes the control of the situation, and it is the only one that sends messages to the robot agent (see  ). "
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: This chapter reviews different approaches for the development of new models, architectures and real applications of physical
agents. The chapter starts by identifying this kind of agents and their main requirements. After that, it presents one approach
to allow deliberation while the world changes, and some specific applications that have been implemented by different participants
of the AgentCities.ES network: a multi-agent system architecture to control a single robot, a submarine robot, and a container
terminal management system for the port of Valencia.
12/2007: pages 117-143;
Note: This list is based on the publications in our database and might not be exhaustive.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.