Conference Paper

Adaptive Design Optimization in Experiments with People.

Conference: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 22: 23rd Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2009. Proceedings of a meeting held 7-10 December 2009, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Source: DBLP
1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Experimentation is at the core of research in the behavioral and neural sciences, yet observations can be expensive and time-consuming to acquire (e.g., MRI scans, responses from infant participants). A major interest of researchers is designing experiments that lead to maximal accumulation of information about the phenomenon under study with the fewest possible number of observations. In addressing this challenge, statisticians have developed adaptive design optimization methods. This letter introduces a hierarchical Bayes extension of adaptive design optimization that provides a judicious way to exploit two complementary schemes of inference (with past and future data) to achieve even greater accuracy and efficiency in information gain. We demonstrate the method in a simulation experiment in the field of visual perception.
    Neural Computation 08/2014; 26(11):1-28. DOI:10.1162/NECO_a_00654 · 1.69 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Experimentation is ubiquitous in the field of psychology and fundamental to the advancement of its science, and one of the biggest challenges for researchers is designing experiments that can conclusively discriminate the theoretical hypotheses or models under investigation. The recognition of this challenge has led to the development of sophisticated statistical methods that aid in the design of experiments and that are within the reach of everyday experimental scientists. This tutorial paper introduces the reader to an implementable experimentation methodology, dubbed Adaptive Design Optimization, that can help scientists to conduct "smart" experiments that are maximally informative and highly efficient, which in turn should accelerate scientific discovery in psychology and beyond.
    Journal of Mathematical Psychology 06/2013; 57(3-4):53-67. DOI:10.1016/ · 1.81 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent work by Luce (2010a; 2010b) on p-additive utility theory has yielded three distinct representation classes that correspond to risk attitude. We present a method for classifying decision makers under such $p$-additive representations. Our approach extends the classification criterion described by Luce (2010b) to accommodate decision makers with risk attitudes that vary as a function of the decision environment. We present the results of a new decision making under risk experiment designed to evaluate risk attitude. We found that no single $p$-additive representation model emerged as the best description of the participants' preferences. Participants were best described by consistent risk attitudes and risk attitudes that vary as a function of the decision environment in roughly equal numbers.
    Journal of Mathematical Psychology 08/2013; DOI:10.1016/ · 1.81 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jul 29, 2014