Conference Paper

Influence of chroma variations on naturalness and image quality of stereoscopic images.

DOI: 10.1117/12.817749 Conference: Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XIV - part of the IS&T-SPIE Electronic Imaging Symposium, San Jose, CA, USA, January 19-22, 2009, Proceedings
Source: DBLP


The computational view on image quality of Janssen and Blommaert states
that the quality of an image is determined by the degree to which the
image is both useful (discriminability) and natural (identifiability).
This theory is tested by creating two manipulations. Firstly,
multiplication of the chroma values of each pixel with a constant in the
CIELab color space, i.e., chroma manipulation, is expected to increase
only the usefulness by increasing the distances between the individual
color points, enhancing the contrast. Secondly, introducing stereoscopic
depth by varying the screen disparity, i.e., depth manipulation, is
expected to increase both the usefulness and the naturalness. Twenty
participants assessed perceived image quality, perceived naturalness and
perceived depth of the manipulated versions of two natural scenes. The
results revealed a small, yet significant shift between image quality
and naturalness as a function of the chroma manipulation. In line with
previous research, preference in quality was shifted to higher chroma
values in comparison to preference in naturalness. Introducing depth
enhanced the naturalness scores, however, in contrast to our
expectations, not the image quality scores. It is argued that image
quality is not sufficient to evaluate the full experience of 3D. Image
quality appears to be only one of the attributes underlying the
naturalness of stereoscopic images.

Download full-text


Available from: Wijnand A Ijsselsteijn, Feb 26, 2014
50 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The added value of stereoscopy is an important factor for stereoscopic product development and content production. Previous studies have shown that "image quality" does not encompass the added value of stereoscopy, and thus the attributes naturalness and viewing experience have been used to evaluate stereoscopic content. The objective of this study was to explore what the added value of stereoscopy may consist of and what are the content properties that contribute to the magnitude of the added value. The hypothesis was that interestingness is a significant component of the added value. A subjective study was conducted where the participants evaluated three attributes of the stimuli in the consumer photography domain: viewing experience, naturalness of depth and interestingness. In addition to the no-reference direct scaling method a novel method, the recalled attention map, was introduced and used to study attention in stereoscopic images. In the second part of our study, we use eye tracking to compare the salient regions in monoscopic and stereoscopic conditions. We conclude from the subjective results that viewing experience and naturalness of depth do not cover the entire added value of stereoscopy, and that interestingness brings a new dimension into the added value research. The eye tracking data analysis revealed that the fixation maps are more consistent between participants in stereoscopic viewing than in monoscopic viewing and from this we conclude that stereoscopic imagery is more effective in directing the viewer"s attention.
    Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering 02/2011; 7863. DOI:10.1117/12.872437 · 0.20 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Because the chain of events in 3D imaging is vulnerable to different context- and technology-specific variables, it is important to understand the extent to which users can accept feature-specific differences between scenes without a decrease in the (observed) image quality. Twenty participants were asked to view natural stereoscopic still images and evaluate how different combinations of color asymmetries affect the overall viewing experience, the naturalness of the image and the depth perception. As expected, an increase in color asymmetry between the viewer’s left-eye and right-eye images decreased the image quality evaluation scores. Certain color-channel-specific changes, such as a decrease in blue values, were more acceptable than others, and some content-specific features, such as a brownish or greenish background, were less sensitive to changes compared to close-up images with brighter objects and backgrounds.
    Research in Science Education 05/2012; 3(5). DOI:10.1007/3DRes.02(2012)5 · 1.34 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study is two-fold; first, to compare how certain visual aids contribute in depth estimation tasks on a portable autostereoscopic display; and second, how these depth cues impact on perceived quality. These were studied on a quantitative subjective study using a portable autostereoscopic display in controlled laboratory environment. Test participants evaluated object depths on three-dimensional images, where either 2D cues, 3D cues, or their combinations were provided. The study was conducted using three different compression levels in order to study how image quality affects the perception of depth. The results indicate that the depth estimation task is faster conducted when the participants relied on stereoscopic depth cues compared to situations where only monocular cues were present. Also, depth estimation task is faster conducted with higher quality images. Depth estimation accuracy was also higher with stereoscopic depth cues than with monocular ones. These results suggest that the human visual system can make more reliable depth estimates on portable autostereoscopic displays when stereoscopic cues are present. However, the results of the quality evaluations indicate that, as stated also on previous studies, the added stereoscopic depth does not seem to increase the subjective image quality.
    IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing 10/2012; 6(6):698-709. DOI:10.1109/JSTSP.2012.2208731 · 2.37 Impact Factor
Show more