Conference Paper

Evaluating outdoor play for children: virtual vs. tangible game objects in pervasive games.

DOI: 10.1145/1551788.1551844 Conference: Interaction Design and Children, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC 2009, Como, Italy, June 3-5, 2009
Source: DBLP

ABSTRACT In this paper we report a case study where two versions of the same outdoor pervasive game were compared: one featuring a virtual game object and the other with a tangible representation of it. Our aim was to explore the effect on social interaction and physical activity; two characteristics of Head-Up Games. Based on evaluation with 27 children we can conclude that both approaches support Head-Up Games well, and offer different design opportunities that should be explored further. Categories and Subject Descriptors H.1.2 (Information Systems): User/Machine Systems.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Iris Soute, Jun 23, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
196 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is a growing body of research in pervasive outdoor gaming, mainly focused on adult players playing games on smart phones. Published evaluations of the player experience in such games are largely based on anecdotal descriptions and post-play surveys. The latter approach is especially challenging to apply when the play test participants are children. Observations of game play so far have been ad hoc relying on unstructured observation, which makes it difficult to extract reliable conclusions from observations and to draw comparisons between different games. In this paper we present two methods developed specifically for evaluating the player experience in children’s outdoor games: the Outdoor Play Observation Scheme (OPOS) and GroupSorter. We discuss their application in three different case studies and conclude that OPOS is useful in quantifying the different types of play behavior in outdoor games; GroupSorter adds qualitative data on the play experience. Moreover, the application of GroupSorter is not limited to game development but can be used for obtaining user input in other context as well.
    Entertainment Computing 02/2013; 4(1-1):25-38. DOI:10.1016/j.entcom.2012.09.003
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This special issue is devoted to the topic of tangible user interfaces and children. It emphasizes research on tangibility that transcends system descriptions, focusing on the empirical support of theories and design guidance. The papers result from the organization of a workshop at the CHI 2009 ACM conference in Boston, USA. As an introduction to this issue, empirical evidence is discussed for the potential benefits that using TUIs may have for children. Next, we focus on the impact of tangibility in terms of usability, learning, collaboration, and fun. Finally, we suggest directions for future work and outline the papers that are included in this special issue. KeywordsTUI–Children–GUI–Usability–Learning–Collaboration–Fun
    Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 04/2011; 16(4):367-378. DOI:10.1007/s00779-011-0409-x · 1.62 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper explores how different interfaces to a problem-solving task affect how users perform it. Specifically, it focuses on a customized version of the game of Four-in-a-row and compares play on a physical, tangible game board with that conducted in mouse and touch-screen driven virtual versions. This is achieved through a repeated measures study involving a total of 36 participants and which explicitly assesses aspects of cognitive work through measures of time task, subjective workload, the projection of mental constructs onto external structures and the occurrence of explanatory epistemic actions. The results highlight the relevance of projection and epistemic action to this problem-solving task and suggest that the different interface forms afford instantiation of these activities in different ways. The tangible version of the system supports the most rapid execution of these actions and future work on this topic should explore the unique advantages of tangible interfaces in supporting epistemic actions.
    Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction; 02/2013