Article

The "Wits" appraisal of jaw disharmony.

American Journal of Orthodontics 03/1975; 67(2):125-38. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00540-7
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The "Wits" appraisal of jaw disharmony is a simple method whereby the severity or degree of anteroposterior jaw dysplasia may be measured on a lateral cephalometic head film. The method entails drawing perpendiculars from points A and B on the maxilla and mandible, respectively, onto the occlusal plane. The points of contact of the perpendiculars onto the occlusal plane are labeled AO and BO, respectively. In a sample of twenty-one male and twenty-five female adults selected on the basis of excellence of occlusion, it was found, on the average, that in females points AO and BO coincided and in males point BO was located 1 mm. ahead of point AO. In skeltal Class II jaw dysplasias, point BO would be positioned well behind point AO (positive reading), whereas in Class III skeltal jaw disharmonies, the "Wits" reading would be negative, that is, with point BO ahead of point AO. The advantages of the "Wits" appraisal over that of the conventional ANB angle reading are illustrated and discussed.

2 Followers
 · 
331 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The objectives of this paper are to (1) study use of soft tissue analyses advocated by Steiner, Ricketts, Burstone, Sushner and Holdway to develop soft tissue cephalometric norms as baseline data for sagittal lip position in Northeast Chinese adult population, (2) compare the sagittal lip positions in different skeletal malocclusions and (3) compare the sagittal lip positions in Northeast Chinese adults with other reported populations. Methods Lateral cephalometric radiographs of subjects were taken in natural head position. Radiographs were manually traced and five reference lines - Sushner, Steiner, Burstone, Holdway and Ricketts, were used. The linear distance between the tip of the lips and the five reference lines were measured. Statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 21. Descriptive analysis was done for each variable for each subject. Coefficient of variation between lip positions as assessed by reference lines was determined. Post hoc Tukey’s test was used for comparison of the mean cephalometric values of three skeletal malocclusions. The level of significance for the analysis was set at p < 0.05. Results The findings showed significant difference in the sagittal lip positions in different skeletal malocclusions. There was variation in consistent reference line in each skeletal malocclusion. The S2 line was the most consistent reference line in skeletal class I and class II group. The B line was the most consistent line in skeletal class III. In skeletal class II group, upper lips were the most protrusive and lower lips were retrusive than in skeletal class I and class III groups. In case of skeletal class III group, upper lips were retrusive and lower lips were more protrusive than in skeletal class I and class II groups. Conclusions The sagittal lip positions were found to be associated with the skeletal malocclusion pattern. Northeast Chinese population has protrusive upper and lower lip in comparison to Caucasians. Each skeletal malocclusion group showed different preferable reference lines for analysis of sagittal lip position. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40510-015-0077-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
    Progress in orthodontics 05/2015; 16(1). DOI:10.1186/s40510-015-0077-x
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper describes the orthodontic treatment of two cases presented by the winner of the William Houston gold medal at the Membership in Orthodontics examination at the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh and which also won the British Orthodontic Society (BOS) cases prize in 2013. The first case describes the management of a 20-year-old female patient with a Class II division 2 malocclusion complicated by moderate upper and severe lower arch crowding, increased overjet and overbite, a crossbite and centreline discrepancies. Treatment involved a combination of a transpalatal arch, temporary anchorage devices and fixed appliances. The second case describes the management of a 15-year-old male patient with a Class I malocclusion complicated by crossbites affecting the right buccal segment and UR2, an associated mandibular displacement forward and to the right, mild upper arch crowding and a centreline discrepancy. Treatment involved a combination of a quad-helix, headgear and fixed appliances.
    Journal of Orthodontics 03/2015; 42(1):53-68. DOI:10.1179/1465313314Y.0000000119
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objectives of this study were to check the reliability of the five angular and two linear parameters for sagittal maxillo-mandibular discrepancy and to compare and correlate angular parameters with the ANB angle, and the linear parameter with Wits analysis. The pre-treatment and post-functional lateral cephalograms of 25 subjects (17 males, 8 females) with class II division 1 malocclusion treated with twin block functional appliance were selected. Five angular (ANB, β angle, APDI, YEN angle, W angle) and two linear (Wits analysis, App-Bpp) parameters were traced on both sets of cephalograms. Paired Student's t-test, one-way ANOVA, post hoc test, and Karl Pearson correlation statistical analysis were performed. All the parameters considered in our study showed highly significant difference in pre-treatment and post-functional values, suggesting their reliability (p < 0.0001). When ANB angle was compared with the other angular parameters, a highly significant change in the mean value of the difference in pre-treatment (T1) and post-functional (T2) values was noted (p < 0.001). No significant change was seen when comparing the mean value of the difference in T1 and T2 between linear parameters (p = 0.949). All the parameters used in the study can be reliably used to assess anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy. Whenever limitations of the ANB angle and Wits analysis are foreseen, the W angle and App-Bpp, respectively, can be reliably used. The YEN angle may reliably predict the post-functional change with the use of twin block appliance.