Conference Paper

Improving Abstract Interpretations by Combining Domains.

Department of Computer Science, University of Leuven, Louvain, Flemish, Belgium
DOI: 10.1145/200994.200998
Source: DBLP

ABSTRACT This article considers static analysis based on abstract interpretation of logic programs over combined domains. It is known that analyses over combined domains provide more information potentially than obtained by the independent analyses. However, the construction of a combined analysis often requires redefining the basic operations for the combined domain. A practical approach to maintain precision in combined analyses of logic programs which reuses the individual analyses and does not redefine the basic operations is illustrated. The advantages of the approach are that (1) proofs of correctness for the new domains are not required and (2) implementations can be reused. The approach it; demonstrated by showing that a combined sharing analysis constructed from ''old'' proposals - compares well with other ''new'' proposals suggested in recent Literature both from the point of view of efficiency and accuracy.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Analysis or verification of low-level code is useful for minimizing the disconnect between what is verified and what is actually executed and is necessary when source code is unavailable or is, say, intermingled with inline assembly. We present a modular framework for building pipelines of cooperating decompilers that gradually lift the level of the language to something appropriate for source-level tools. Each decompilation stage contains an abstract interpreter that encapsulates its findings about the program by translating the program into a higher-level intermediate language. We provide evidence for the modularity of this framework through the implementation of multiple decompilation pipelines for both x86 and MIPS assembly produced by gcc, gcj, and coolc (a compiler for a pedagogical Java-like language) that share several low-level components. Finally, we discuss our experimental results that apply the BLAST model checker for C and the Cqual analyzer to decompiled assembly.
    08/2006: pages 318-335;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A framework for the automatic parallelization of (constraint) logic programs is proposed and proved correct. Intuitively, the parallelization process replaces conjunctions of literals with parallel expressions. Such expressions trigger at run-time the exploitation of restricted, goal-level, independent and parallelism. The parallelization process performs two steps. The first one builds a conditional dependency graph (which can be simplified using compile-time analysis information), while the second transforms the resulting graph into linear conditional expressions, the parallel expressions of the &-Prolog language. Several heuristic algorithms for the latter (“annotation”) process are proposed and proved correct. Algorithms are also given which determine if there is any loss of parallelism in the linearization process with respect to a proposed notion of maximal parallelism. Finally, a system is presented which implements the proposed approach. The performance of the different annotation algorithms is compared experimentally in this system by studying the time spent in parallelization and the effectiveness of the results in terms of speedups.
    The Journal of Logic Programming 02/1999; DOI:10.1016/S0743-1066(98)10022-5
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We present and evaluate a framework and tool for combining multiple program analyses which allows the dynamic (on-line) adjustment of the precision of each analysis depending on the accumulated results. For example, the explicit tracking of the values of a variable may be switched off in favor of a predicate abstraction when and where the number of different variable values that have been encountered has exceeded a specified threshold. The method is evaluated on verifying the SSH client/server software and shows significant gains compared with predicate abstraction-based model checking.
    Automated Software Engineering, 2008. ASE 2008. 23rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on; 01/2008