Conference Paper

An Argumentation-Based Approach to Multiple Criteria Decision.

DOI: 10.1007/11518655_24 Conference: Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, 8th European Conference, ECSQARU 2005, Barcelona, Spain, July 6-8, 2005, Proceedings
Source: DBLP

ABSTRACT The paper presents a first tentative work that investigates the interest and the questions raised by the introduction of argumenta- tion capabilities in multiple criteria decision-making. Emphasizing the positive and the negative aspects of possible choices, by means of ar- guments in favor or against them is valuable to the user of a decision- support system. In agreement with the symbolic character of arguments, the proposed approach remains qualitative in nature and uses a bipolar scale for the assessment of criteria. The paper formalises a multicriteria decision problem within a logical argumentation system. An illustrative example is provided. Various decision principles are considered, whose psychological validity is assessed by an experimental study.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: One of the ARGUGRID goals is to provide a new model for argumentative agents populating and evolving within a trusted grid environment. For this purpose, this deliverable document specifies the format of the state of agents populating the grid, by specifying agents' knowledge (including internal representation of workflows), goals, preferences, and benefits assigned to world situations.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An important aspect of decision making is that a decision is not made at a time assuming that the decision maker (DM) has all relevant information at hand at the same time. On the contrary making a decision results from a process during which (non) relevant and possibly conflicting information come at different instant. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) is a typical case of a dynamic process. We show in this paper how argumentation can help to represent this dynamics.
    Proceedings of the 12th European conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty; 07/2013
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although Marek Sergot's contribution to Artificial Intelliegnce and Law is mainly associated with the formalisation of legislation as a logic program, he also wrote on an approach to the treatment of open textured concepts in law, using argumentation. That paper posed the question what makes an argument persuasive? This short paper considers the ideas of that paper and discusses developments in AI and Law over the subsequent 25 years, focusing on the progress made in answering this question in that domain.
    Logic Programs, Norms and Action; 01/2012