On the role of attentional inhibition and memory during visual search.
Psychonomie & Helmholtz Instituut, Utrecht Univ., Netherlands
DOI: 10.1109/ICSMC.2004.1400014 Conference: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man & Cybernetics: The Hague, Netherlands, 10-13 October 2004
Although humans have limited memory and visual processing capacity, they are capable of finding partly specified targets in complex and dynamic environments. Nowadays there is much need for such effective artificial searchers (for example in military, security and medical image processing). The way the human brain keeps track of inspected items may inspire designers of artificial systems. The role of inhibition of return (putative attentional memory) and the role of memory in visual search in general are discussed. Based on two eye movement studies we conclude that humans use a smart scanning strategy rather than explicit memory to avoid previously inspected locations. Such strategies could be useful in artificial systems that operate in environments that change frequently.
Available from: Eelco Over
- "Therefore, a new assumption was added, namely that the new fixation location is dependent of the previous fixation locations. This is a reasonable assumption because this kind of behavior is frequently encountered (Gilchrist & Harvey, 2000; Hooge et al., 2004). In the model we introduced the visual span, which should not overlap with previous spans. "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This thesis deals with the quantitative analysis of saccadic search strategy. The goal of the research presented was twofold: 1) to quantify overall characteristics of fixation location and saccade direction, and 2) to identify search strategies, with the use of a quantitative description of eye movement parameters. Chapter 2 provides a method to quantify a general property of fixation locations. We proposed a quantitative measure based on Voronoi diagrams for the characterization of the uniformity of fixation density. This measure may be thought of as indicating the clustering of fixations. We showed that during a visual search task, a structured (natural) background leads to higher clustering of fixations compared to a homogeneous background. In addition, in natural stimuli, a search task leads to higher clustering of fixations than the instruction to freely view the stimuli. Chapter 3 provides a method to identify the overall field of saccade directions in the viewing area. We extended the Voronoi method of chapter 2 so that it became possible to create vector maps. These maps indicate the preferred saccade direction for each position in the viewing area. Several measures of these vector maps were used to quantify the influence of observer-dependent and stimulus-dependent factors on saccade direction in a search task with natural scenes. The results showed that the influence of stimulus-dependent factors appeared to be larger than the influence of observer-dependent factors. In chapter 4 we showed that the border of the search area played a role in the search strategy. In a search experiment in differently shaped areas we measured that search performance was poorer near the search area luminance edges. Fixation density, however, was higher in the edge region, and saccade direction was mainly along the edges of the search areas. In a target visibility experiment we established that the visibility of targets near a luminance edge is less than the visibility of targets against a homogeneous background. We interpreted this as the visual span being smaller near luminance edges than in homogeneous backgrounds. We concluded that search area edges affected eye movement strategy both at sensory level and cognitive level. Search area edges hampered target perception, so that fixation density had to be higher in the edge regions in order to achieve similar search performance as in the center regions. In chapter 5 we investigated the effect of a priori knowledge about target conspicuity on saccade amplitude and fixation duration. The visual system may use fixation duration and saccadic amplitude as optimizers for visual search performance. We expected to find (nearly) optimal settings for saccade amplitude and fixation duration in a search task with known target conspicuity, and sub-optimal settings in a search task with unknown target conspicuity. However, we found that saccade amplitude decreased and fixation duration increased gradually as a function of the serial order of saccades and fixations in search experiments with known as well as unknown target conspicuity. These changes are the mark of a coarse-to-fine search strategy, in which a stimulus is at first scanned quickly, and progressively better scrutinized to find the target. We hypothesized an intrinsic coarse-to-fine strategy for visual search that is even used when such a strategy is suboptimal.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.