Conference Paper

Finite Element Analysis of Femur Stress under Bending Moment and Compression Load.

DOI: 10.1109/BMEI.2009.5305316 Conference: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on BioMedical Engineering and Informatics, BMEI 2009, October 17-19, 2009, Tianjin, China
Source: DBLP


A quantitative assessment of femur stress under compression and bending condition is essential for the understanding of failure mechanisms and providing guidance for the design and operation of femur replacement. The stress distribution of femur under bending moment and compressive load is simulated using finite element method (FEM) in this paper. A two-dimensional FEM model is established according to the dimension of a typical human femur. The bending moments are obtained by shifting the load action point to the outward lateral direction. Four excursion lengths 0 mm, 5 mm, 10 mm and 15 mm are tested. The deformation and stress distribution of femur, the stress in the cross section of femoral head, neck and femoral shift under bending moment and compressive load are obtained. It can be found from the numerical results that there is obvious stress concentration at femoral neck and tension stress occurs in the outside while the compressive stress occurs in inner side. In the cross section of femoral shaft, tension stress again occurs in the outside and compressive stress occurs in inner side. The femur stress increases significantly with the bending moment.

1 Follower
11 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Femoral head vitality was evaluated by tetracycline labeling and 99mTc-MDP scintimetry in 317 femoral neck fractures before and after internal fixation with two hook-pins. The preoperative vitality was about the same as that observed by others using comparable methods. The postoperative vitality was reduced in five of 81 undisplaced fractures and in 76 of 236 displaced fractures. These data would predict a rate of avascular healing complications of 7% in undisplaced and 32% in displaced fractures treated with hook-pins.
    Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 01/1985; · 2.77 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Finite element model could be generated by computed tomography (CT) data set which provide accurate information about bone geometry and tissue density. In this work, an efficient approach for computing CT numbers for each element is presented. Mechanical properties of bone tissue can be estimated according to the relationship between tissue density and CT numbers. The experimental results show that this method can be applied to estimate mechanical properties of bone tissue accurately. The quality of meshes of geometry model and the number of materials are two key factors that affect the accuracy and efficiency of biomechanical analysis. In addition, the choice of relationship between CT numbers andelastic modulus should be proved by further study, which may help many researchers develop more accurate models.
    Computer-Based Medical Systems, 2008. CBMS '08. 21st IEEE International Symposium on; 07/2008
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We questioned whether the excellent clinical results reported for the hydroxyapatite-coated ABG hip are consistent with results of preclinical computer simulation methods for the prediction of strain-adaptive bone remodeling patterns around implants. We also investigated whether a further improvement of the results can be expected if complete proximal load transfer is enforced by reducing stem length to the metaphyseal area only. Resorption patterns predicted were in good agreement with radiographic clinical findings. Mechanical failure of the bone-implant interface was judged based on a Hoffman interface stress criterion, which was low. Reducing stem length hardly increased interface failure probability, but it did not reduce stress shielding, either. From a mechanical point of view, reducing stem length to the metaphyseal area only is not advantageous.
    The Journal of Arthroplasty 01/2002; 16(8 Suppl 1):55-63. DOI:10.1054/arth.2001.28369 · 2.67 Impact Factor