Article

Application of Information Technology: Computerized Surveillance for Adverse Drug Events in a Pediatric Hospital.

Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; BJC Healthcare, Center for Healthcare Quality and Effectiveness, St Louis, MO; St Louis Children's Hospital, St Louis, MO
JAMIA 01/2009; 16:607-612. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M3167
Source: DBLP

ABSTRACT There are limited data on adverse drug event rates in pediatrics. The authors describe the implementation and evaluation of an automated surveillance system modified to detect adverse drug events (ADEs) in pediatric patients. The authors constructed an automated surveillance system to screen admissions to a large pediatric hospital. Potential ADEs identified by the system were reviewed by medication safety pharmacists and a physician and scored for causality and severity. Over the 6 month study period, 6,889 study children were admitted to the hospital for a total of 40,250 patient-days. The ADE surveillance system generated 1226 alerts, which yielded 160 true ADEs. This represents a rate of 2.3 ADEs per 100 admissions or 4 per 1,000 patient-days. Medications most frequently implicated were diuretics, antibiotics, immunosuppressants, narcotics, and anticonvulsants. The composite positive predictive value of the ADE surveillance system was 13%. Automated surveillance can be an effective method for detecting ADEs in hospitalized children.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
44 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In a sample of 30,195 randomly selected hospital records, we identified 1133 patients (3.7 percent) with disabling injuries caused by medical treatment. We report here an analysis of these adverse events and their relation to error, negligence, and disability. Two physician-reviewers independently identified the adverse events and evaluated them with respect to negligence, errors in management, and extent of disability. One of the authors classified each event according to type of injury. We tested the significance of differences in rates of negligence and disability among categories with at least 30 adverse events. Drug complications were the most common type of adverse event (19 percent), followed by wound infections (14 percent) and technical complications (13 percent). Nearly half the adverse events (48 percent) were associated with an operation. Adverse events during surgery were less likely to be caused by negligence (17 percent) than nonsurgical ones (37 percent). The proportion of adverse events due to negligence was highest for diagnostic mishaps (75 percent), noninvasive therapeutic mishaps ("errors of omission") (77 percent), and events occurring in the emergency room (70 percent). Errors in management were identified for 58 percent of the adverse events, among which nearly half were attributed to negligence. Although the prevention of many adverse events must await improvements in medical knowledge, the high proportion that are due to management errors suggests that many others are potentially preventable now. Reducing the incidence of these events will require identifying their causes and developing methods to prevent error or reduce its effects.
    New England Journal of Medicine 03/1991; 324(6):377-84. · 51.66 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Children are at exceptionally high risk for adverse drug events. At Duke University Hospital, computerized adverse drug event surveillance and voluntary safety reporting systems work synergistically to identify adverse drug events. Here we identify the most deleterious drug classes to pediatric inpatients and determine which detection methodology provides the greatest opportunity to reduce harm. We evaluated all of the medication-related events detected by our computerized surveillance and safety reporting systems over a 1-year period for Duke University Hospital pediatric inpatients. Events from both systems were scored for severity and assigned a drug event category. Surveillance events were additionally scored for causality. A total of 849 medication-related reports were entered into the safety reporting system, and 93 caused patient harm, resulting in an adverse drug event rate of 1.8 events per 1000 pediatric patient-days. Seventy eight of the 1537 medication-related events detected by surveillance resulted in patient harm, giving a rate of 1.6 events per 1000 patient-days. The most common events identified by the safety reporting system were failures in the medication use process (26.9%), drug omissions (16.1%), and dose- or rate-related events (12.9%). The most frequent adverse drug event surveillance categories were nephrotoxins (20.7%), narcotics and benzodiazepines (19.3%), and hypoglycemia (11.5%). Most voluntarily reported events originated in ICUs (72.0%), whereas surveillance events were split evenly across intensive and general care. There was little overlap between methodologies. The epidemiology of pediatric adverse drug events is best addressed by using voluntary reporting in tandem with other strategies, such as computerized surveillance and targeted chart review. Although voluntary reporting excels at identifying administration errors, surveillance excels at detecting adverse drug events caused by high-risk medications and identifies evolving conditions that may provoke imminent patient harm. Surveillance underperformed in pediatrics when compared with adult detection rates, suggesting that tailored rules may be necessary for a robust pediatric adverse drug event surveillance system.
    PEDIATRICS 06/2008; 121(5):e1201-7. · 4.47 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To report the occurrence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), discuss its pathophysiology, and outline an approach to management in the pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) patient. Retrospective case reports. Pediatric ICU in a tertiary-care center. Patients and Two pediatric ICU patients (2 and 6 mos of age) who developed HIT in the pediatric ICU. One was receiving heparin as a flush solution through a central line and the other had full heparinization during cardiopulmonary bypass. Both had received heparin during their neonatal course and developed thrombocytopenia; however, HIT was not considered as a possible diagnosis. HIT was diagnosed using a heparin-induced platelet aggregation study. The thrombocytopenia resolved with the cessation of heparin administration. One of the patients developed a deep vein thrombosis around a femoral venous catheter. Although well described in the adult literature, there have been a limited number of reports of HIT in pediatric-aged patients. Given its potential for morbidity, HIT should be considered in the differential diagnosis of thrombocytopenia in the pediatric ICU patient.
    Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 04/2005; 6(2):216-9. · 2.35 Impact Factor