Article

How Hard Is It to Approximate the Best Nash Equilibrium?

SIAM Journal on Computing (Impact Factor: 0.76). 01/2011; 40:79-91. DOI: 10.1137/090766991
Source: DBLP

ABSTRACT The quest for a PTAS for Nash equilibrium in a two-player game seeks to circumvent the PPAD-completeness of an (exact) Nash equilibrium by finding an approximate equilibrium, and has emerged as a major open question in Algorithmic Game Theory. A closely related problem is that of finding an equilibrium maximizing a certain objective, such as the social welfare. This optimization problem was shown to be NP-hard by Gilboa and Zemel [Games and Economic Behavior 1989]. However, this NP-hardness is unlikely to extend to finding an approximate equilibrium, since the latter admits a quasi-polynomial time algorithm, as proved by Lipton, Markakis and Mehta [Proc. of 4th EC, 2003]. We show that this optimization problem, namely, finding in a two-player game an approximate equilibrium achieving large social welfare is unlikely to have a polynomial time algorithm. One interpretation of our results is that the quest for a PTAS for Nash equilibrium should not extend to a PTAS for finding the best Nash equilibrium, which stands in contrast to certain algorithmic techniques used so far (e.g. sampling and enumeration). Technically, our result is a reduction from a notoriously difficult problem in modern Combinatorics, of finding a planted (but hidden) clique in a random graph G(n, 1/2). Our reduction starts from an instance with planted clique size k = O(log n). For comparison, the currently known algorithms due to Alon, Krivelevich and Sudakov [Random Struct. & Algorithms, 1998], and Krauthgamer and Feige [Random Struct. & Algorithms, 2000], are effective for a much larger clique size k = Ω(√n).

0 Followers
 · 
75 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We show that, assuming the (deterministic) Exponential Time Hypothesis, distinguishing between a graph with an induced $k$-clique and a graph in which all k-subgraphs have density at most $1-\epsilon$, requires $n^{\tilde \Omega(log n)}$ time. Our result essentially matches the quasi-polynomial algorithms of Feige and Seltser [FS97] and Barman [Bar15] for this problem, and is the first one to rule out an additive PTAS for Densest $k$-Subgraph. We further strengthen this result by showing that our lower bound continues to hold when, in the soundness case, even subgraphs smaller by a near-polynomial factor ($k' = k 2^{-\tilde \Omega (log n)}$) are assumed to be at most ($1-\epsilon$)-dense. Our reduction is inspired by recent applications of the "birthday repetition" technique [AIM14,BKW15]. Our analysis relies on information theoretical machinery and is similar in spirit to analyzing a parallel repetition of two-prover games in which the provers may choose to answer some challenges multiple times, while completely ignoring other challenges.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Compressed sensing is a technique for finding sparse solutions to underdetermined linear systems. This technique relies on properties of the sensing matrix such as the restricted isometry property. Sensing matrices that satisfy this property with optimal parameters are mainly obtained via probabilistic arguments. Deciding whether a given matrix satisfies the restricted isometry property is a nontrivial computational problem. Indeed, it is shown in this paper that restricted isometry parameters cannot be approximated in polynomial time within any constant factor under the assumption that the hidden clique problem is hard. In addition, on the positive side, an improvement on the brute-force enumeration algorithm for checking the restricted isometry property is proposed.
    IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 08/2014; 60(8):4999-5006. DOI:10.1109/TIT.2014.2331341 · 2.65 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We consider the following detection problem: given a realization of a symmetric matrix ${\mathbf{X}}$ of dimension $n$, distinguish between the hypothesis that all upper triangular variables are i.i.d. Gaussians variables with mean 0 and variance $1$ and the hypothesis where ${\mathbf{X}}$ is the sum of such matrix and an independent rank-one perturbation. This setup applies to the situation where under the alternative, there is a planted principal submatrix ${\mathbf{B}}$ of size $L$ for which all upper triangular variables are i.i.d. Gaussians with mean $1$ and variance $1$, whereas all other upper triangular elements of ${\mathbf{X}}$ not in ${\mathbf{B}}$ are i.i.d. Gaussians variables with mean 0 and variance $1$. We refer to this as the `Gaussian hidden clique problem.' When $L=(1+\epsilon)\sqrt{n}$ ($\epsilon>0$), it is possible to solve this detection problem with probability $1-o_n(1)$ by computing the spectrum of ${\mathbf{X}}$ and considering the largest eigenvalue of ${\mathbf{X}}$. We prove that this condition is tight in the following sense: when $L<(1-\epsilon)\sqrt{n}$ no algorithm that examines only the eigenvalues of ${\mathbf{X}}$ can detect the existence of a hidden Gaussian clique, with error probability vanishing as $n\to\infty$. We prove this result as an immediate consequence of a more general result on rank-one perturbations of $k$-dimensional Gaussian tensors. In this context we establish a lower bound on the critical signal-to-noise ratio below which a rank-one signal cannot be detected.