Article

Simultaneous optimal selection of design and manufacturing tolerances with alternative manufacturing process selection.

Computer-Aided Design 01/2011; 43:207-218. DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2010.10.001
Source: DBLP

ABSTRACT Tolerance specification is an important part of mechanical design. Design tolerances strongly influence the functional performance and manufacturing cost of a mechanical product. Tighter tolerances normally produce superior components, better performing mechanical systems and good assemblability with assured exchangeability at the assembly line. However, unnecessarily tight tolerances lead to excessive manufacturing costs for a given application. The balancing of performance and manufacturing cost through identification of optimal design tolerances is a major concern in modern design. Traditionally, design tolerances are specified based on the designer’s experience. Computer-aided (or software-based) tolerance synthesis and alternative manufacturing process selection programs allow a designer to verify the relations between all design tolerances to produce a consistent and feasible design. In this paper, a general new methodology using intelligent algorithms viz., Elitist Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) and Multi Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO) for simultaneous optimal selection of design and manufacturing tolerances with alternative manufacturing process selection is presented. The problem has a multi-criterion character in which 3 objective functions, 3 constraints and 5 variables are considered. The average fitness factor method and normalized weighted objective functions method are separately used to select the best optimal solution from Pareto optimal fronts. Two multi-objective performance measures namely solution spread measure and ratio of non-dominated individuals are used to evaluate the strength of Pareto optimal fronts. Two more multi-objective performance measures namely optimiser overhead and algorithm effort are used to find the computational effort of NSGA-II and MOPSO algorithms. The Pareto optimal fronts and results obtained from various techniques are compared and analysed.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
67 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper addresses the problem of multi-objective facility layout planning. The aim is to solve the single row facility layout problems (SRFLP) and find the linear machine sequence which minimizes the following: The total investment cost of machines; the total material handling cost; the total number of machines in the final sequence; and the total flow distance of the products in units. The tabu search algorithm (TSA) which has now become a very useful tool in solving a variety of combinatorial optimization problems is made use of here. TSA is developed to determine the product sequence based on which a common linear machine sequence is found out for multi-products with different machine sequences. We assume that, limited number of duplicate machine types available for job. The results are compared with other approaches and it shows the effectiveness of the TSA approach as a practical decision support tool to solve problems in SRFLP.
    Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems 01/2014; 14(13):17-40.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper presents the development of heuristics for determining a common linear machine sequence for multi-products with different operation sequences and facilities with a limited number of duplicate machine types available for a specific job. The final linear machine sequence is obtained by three different methods: (i) Product sequence based on descending order of flow distances, (ii) Product sequence based on descending order of product due date, and (iii) Product sequence based on random selection. This work aims to compare the effectiveness of the three approaches based on the results of (a) minimum total flow distance traveled by products, (b) minimum number of machines in the final linear sequence, and (c) minimum total investment cost of the machines in the final sequence. It is assumed that the product flow runs only in the forward direction, either via in-sequence or bypass movement. This work demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed heuristics by solving a typical layout design problem taken from the literature and several randomly generated problems. The results of three different approaches are compared, and it provides practical support in making decisions while solving the problems inherent in multi-objective facility layout design.
    3rd International Conference on Recent Advances in Material Processing technology, National Engineering College, K.R.Nagar-628503, Tamilnadu, India; 02/2013
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: When an enterprise has thousands of varieties in its inventory, the use of a single management method could not be a feasible approach. A better way to manage this problem would be to categorise inventory items into several clusters according to inventory decisions and to use different management methods for managing different clusters. The present study applies DPSO (dynamic particle swarm optimisation) to a problem of clustering of inventory items. Without the requirement of prior inventory knowledge, inventory items are automatically clustered into near optimal clustering number. The obtained clustering results should satisfy the inventory objective equation, which consists of different objectives such as total cost, backorder rate, demand relevance, and inventory turnover rate. This study integrates the above four objectives into a multiobjective equation, and inputs the actual inventory items of the enterprise into DPSO. In comparison with other clustering methods, the proposed method can consider different objectives and obtain an overall better solution to obtain better convergence results and inventory decisions.
    TheScientificWorldJournal. 01/2014; 2014:805879.

Full-text

Download
3 Downloads
Available from