Modeling of Brain Shift Phenomenon for Different Craniotomies and Solid Models

Journal of Applied Mathematics (Impact Factor: 0.72). 01/2012; 2012(12). DOI: 10.1155/2012/409127
Source: DBLP


This study investigates the effects of different solid models on predictions of
brain shift for three craniotomies. We created a generic 3D brain model based on
healthy human brain and modeled the brain parenchyma as single continuum and
constrained by a practically rigid skull. We have used elastic model,
hyperelastic 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Ogden models, and hyperelastic Mooney-Rivlin with
2- and 5-parameter models. A pressure on the brain surface at craniotomy region
was applied to load the model. The models were solved with the finite elements
package ANSYS. The predictions on stress and displacements were compared for
three different craniotomies. The difference between the predictions of elastic
solid model and a hyperelastic Ogden solid model of maximum brain displacement
and maximum effective stress is relevant.

Download full-text


Available from: Benjamin Blas, Oct 05, 2015
38 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The fetus head is a sensible structure, subjected to high efforts, since it has to pass through the birth canal. During vaginal delivery the fetal head is subjected to high loads, which are caused by the pelvic floor. The sutures in the skull are called cranial sutures and lie between the bony plates and are responsible for protecting the brain. Due to the existence of these sutures, the skull bones can move as they go through all the diameters of the maternal pelvis. The objective of this study is to contribute to the clarification of the values of the strains and stresses caused in the fetal head, related to a vaginal delivery. In this work, the stretch on the pelvic floor and in the fetal skull were studied. The forces caused by the fetus on the pelvic floor, when the fetus moves down toward the vulva were also studied. In this work we simulated a vaginal delivery with a fetus considered rigid and a fetus considered deformable (presence of the flexible sutures), presenting in an occiput-anterior position and in an occiput-posterior position. The results obtained for the stretching of the pelvic floor and the fetus skull are higher when the fetus is considered a rigid structure and in an occiput-posterior position. When the skull is a rigid structure, the forces on the pelvic floor and the stretches caused by the fetus are greater in relation to the skull with a deformable structure (presence of the flexible sutures).
    Bioengineering (ENBENG), 2013 IEEE 3rd Portuguese Meeting in; 01/2013
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pelvic floor injuries during vaginal delivery are considered a significant risk factor to develop pelvic floor dysfunction. The molding of the fetus head during vaginal delivery facilitates the labor progress, since it adjusts to the birth canal geometry. In this work, a finite element model was used to represent the effects induced by the passage of the fetus head on the pelvic floor. The numerical model used for this simulation included the pelvic floor muscles attached to the bones, and a fetus body. The model of the fetus head included the skin and soft tissues, the skull with sutures and fontanelles, and the brain. The fetus head movements during birth in vertex position were simulated: descent, internal rotation and extension. Two models of the fetus head were compared: a rigid and a deformable one, with the inclusion of the cranial sutures. The influence of the fetus head molding on the pelvic floor muscles was analyzed by evaluating their reaction forces, stretch, and stress and strain fields. Additionally, anatomical indices for the molding of the fetal skull were obtained and compared with clinical data. The passage of the deformable fetus head through the birth canal leads to a reduction of 17.3% on the reaction forces on the pelvic floor muscles when compared to the ones of a rigid head. Furthermore, the fetus head molding implies inferior resistance to rotation resulting in a reduction of 1.86% in muscle stretching. Quantitative evaluation of the fetus head molding showed good agreement with clinical experiments. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Journal of Biomechanics 02/2015; 48(9). DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.032 · 2.75 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Image guidance is widely used in neurosurgery. Tracking systems (neuronavigators) allow registering the preoperative image space to the surgical space. The localization accuracy is influenced by technical and clinical factors, such as brain shift. This paper aims at providing quantitative measure of the time-varying brain shift during open epilepsy surgery, and at measuring the pattern of brain deformation with respect to three potentially meaningful parameters: craniotomy area, craniotomy orientation and gravity vector direction in the images reference frame. We integrated an image-guided surgery system with 3D Slicer, an open-source package freely available in the Internet. We identified the preoperative position of several cortical features in the image space of 12 patients, inspecting both the multiplanar and the 3D reconstructions. We subsequently repeatedly tracked their position in the surgical space. Therefore, we measured the cortical shift, following its time-related changes and estimating its correlation with gravity and craniotomy normal directions. The mean of the median brain shift amount is 9.64 mm ([Formula: see text] mm). The brain shift amount resulted not correlated with respect to the gravity direction, the craniotomy normal, the angle between the gravity and the craniotomy normal and the craniotomy area. Our method, which relies on cortex surface 3D measurements, gave results, which are consistent with literature. Our measurements are useful for the neurosurgeon, since they provide a continuous monitoring of the intra-operative sinking or bulking of the brain, giving an estimate of the preoperative images validity versus time.
    International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 07/2015; DOI:10.1007/s11548-015-1259-1 · 1.71 Impact Factor