Article

The Systemics of Dialogism: On the Prevalence of the Self in HCI Design.

Journal of the American Society for Information Science (Impact Factor: 2.01). 11/1997; 48:1073-1081. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199711)48:113.0.CO;2-T
Source: DBLP

ABSTRACT https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220433804_The_Systemics_of_Dialogism_On_the_Prevalence_of_the_Self_in_HCI_Design

0 Followers
 · 
167 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Coinciding with the development and growth of the Internet, there has been a dramatic increase in the application of the Learning Management Systems (LMS) in higher education. University and college campuses should consider evaluating each LMS to ensure that the system meets the requirements and demands of the institution. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to present a model which incorporates the concepts and findings from research on LMS application in higher education. The alternative model was modified based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). In addition, five categories of LMS features for higher education are discussed including: (1) transmitting course content; (2) evaluating students; (3) evaluating courses and instructors; (4) creating class discussions; and (5) creating computer-based instruction. This study reviews and discusses prior research and provides several recommendations including a model of development and design of an LMS for future implementation in higher educational environments.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The year 2001 was a "fast year" for research in Natural Computation and Robotics. In that year, the author of an article in Minds & Machines asks two highly pertinent questions for robotics: 1) If a robot is able to participate in simple language games as adequately as a child, should we concede true meaning and intelligence to it? and 2) How would we go about developing a robot which could possibly live up to a positive answer to the first question? My approach is straightforward: a) refute the first question, so as to b) forget the last. I then argue in favour of supporting another well-known sub-domain of AI/HCI/Robotics thought in order to stimulate research in the artificial sciences.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Erroneously attributing propositional attitudes (desires, beliefs...) to computational artefacts has become internationally commonplace in the public arena, especially amongst the new generation of non-initiated users. Technology for rendering machines “user-friendly” is often inspired by interpersonal human communication. This calls forth designers to conceptualise a major component of human intelligence: the sense ofcommunicability, and its logical consequences. The inherentincommunicability of machines subsequently causes a shift in design strategy. Though cataloguing components of bouts between person and machine with Speech Act Theory has been popular, I will endeavour to present thesine qua non for their insertion into a larger unit of discourse — their societal embodiment. I shall argue that the so-called “intelligence” of the artificial should to be seenas a purposeful act that is socially generated, because it comes of Man,for Man. Designership will provide the forum for evolving user requirements and interface renewal.
    AI & Society 09/1996; 10(3-4):315-332. DOI:10.1007/BF01174607