Division of Labor by Gender and Postmarital Residence in Cross-Cultural Perspective: A Reconsideration

Cross-Cultural Research (Impact Factor: 0.75). 11/2003; Vol. 37(No. 4):335-372. DOI: 10.1177/1069397103253685

ABSTRACT First theories proposed to explain determinants of postmarital residence
connected it with the division of labor by gender. However, at
the moment all the cross-cultural tests of this hypothesis using
worldwide samples have failed to find any significant relationship
between these two variables. In the meantime, the alternative explanations
of the postmarital residence led the author to expect that
such a relationship would be found if the societies with an extremely
low female contribution to subsistence were contrasted with
the rest of the world cultures. There are reasons to expect that an extremely
low female contribution should predict more or less
strongly the nonmatrilocal residence and less strongly (but still significantly)
the patrilocal residence. Aseries of worldwide crosscultural
tests performed by the author using five various sets of
coded data on female contribution to subsistence has fully supported
this hypothesis.


Available from: A. Korotayev, Apr 16, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Focusing on Melvin Ember’s kinship interests, this article tries to summarize what we know and don’t know about the conditions favoring different aspects of cultural variation in kinship and social organization. What explains the incest taboo and its variable extensions to cousin marriage? What explains marriage? What explains variation in marital residence patterns? Why polygyny versus monogamy? Why are family households extended or independent? Why do unilineal descent groups form?
    Cross-Cultural Research 02/2011; 45(1):16-36. DOI:10.1177/1069397110383947 · 0.75 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: 1 What is Cross-Cultural Research? Human communities have a variety of practices, beliefs, social roles, norms, expressions, forms of organization and conflicts (economic, political, legal, religious, expressive and artistic) that exhibit various sorts of internal coherence as well as cleavages within communities. These coherences and cleavages bear many close connections to the different historical experiences, physical and social environments in which people live. They include configurations of elements and characteristic ways of interrelating that are shared with neighboring and interacting groups, and shared among dispersed groups that have common historical experiences and similarities, including common origin, common membership in historical civilizations, and languages that are mutually understood or that derive common families. Lines of cleavage, conflict, and marginality, of course, are part of cultural phenomena. Elements and relationships that individuals or communities have in common are shared in a variety of ways. Some, such as the more intensive patterns of interaction that derive from common residence, joint experience, and discourse in a common language or system of signs, are relatively well bounded. Other patterns of sharing or similarity derive from processes of dispersal: migration, diaspora, the trajectory of lives lived through spatial movements, social mobility, careers, distinctive histories. Interactions are by no means limited to localities, but to the trajectories of inhabitants who move through and between localities. Cultures consist of shared constructions that emerge out of social interactions of sets of individuals who inhabit overlapping social and physical spaces. Coherence may be viewed as an emergent property, but may be present or absent to varying degrees and along varying dimensions or trajectories.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: When we have asked Hadza whether married couples should live with the family of the wife (uxorilocally) or the family of the husband (virilocally), we are often told that young couples should spend the first years of a marriage living with the wife's family, and then later, after a few children have been born, the couple has more freedom--they can continue to reside with the wife's kin, or else they could join the husband's kin, or perhaps live in a camp where there are no close kin. In this paper, we address why shifts in kin coresidence patterns may arise in the later years of a marriage, after the birth of children. To do so, we model the inclusive fitness costs that wives might experience from leaving their own kin and joining their husband's kin as a function of the number of children in their nuclear family. Our model suggests that such shifts should become less costly to wives as their families grow. This simple model may help explain some of the dynamics of postmarital residence among the Hadza and offer insight into the dynamics of multilocal residence, the most prevalent form of postmarital residence among foragers.
    Human Nature 07/2011; 22(1-2):128-38. DOI:10.1007/s12110-011-9109-5 · 1.96 Impact Factor