Naïve Cartography: How Intuitions about Display Configuration Can Hurt Performance.

Cartographica 01/2009; 44:171-186. DOI: 10.3138/carto.44.3.171
Source: DBLP
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Often implicit in visual display design and development is a gold standard of photorealism. By approximating direct perception, photorealism appeals to users and designers by being both attractive and apparently effortless. The vexing result from numerous performance evaluations, though, is that increasing realism often impairs performance. Smallman and St. John (2005) labeled misplaced faith in realistic information display Naïve Realism and theorized it resulted from a triplet of folk fallacies about perception. Here, we illustrate issues associated with the wider trend towards realism by focusing on a specific current trend for high-fidelity perspective view (3D) geospatial displays. In two experiments, we validated Naïve Realism for different terrain understanding tasks, explored whether certain individuals are particularly prone to Naïve Realism, and determined the ability of task feedback to mitigate Naïve Realism. Performance was measured for laying and judging a concealed route across realistic terrain shown in different display formats. Task feedback was either implicit, in Experiment 1, or explicit in Experiment 2. Prospective and retrospective intuitions about the best display formats for the tasks were recorded and then related to task performance and participant spatial ability. Participants generally intuited they would perform tasks better with more realism than they actually required. For example, counter to intuitions, lowering fidelity of the terrain display revealed the gross scene layout needed to lay a well-concealed route. Individuals of high spatial ability calibrated their intuitions with only implicit task feedback, whereas those of low spatial ability required salient, explicit feedback to calibrate their intuitions about display realism. Results are discussed in the wider context of applying perceptual science to display design, and combating folk fallacies.
    Topics in Cognitive Science 08/2010; 3(3):579 - 608. · 2.88 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since the roles of intuition and affection in map use and the relationship between these processes and the effectiveness in activities supported by maps have not been completely measured, this paper intends to bring a contribution to the discussion about the relationship between subjective preference and objective performance. A series of experiments with graduation students was carried out, asking students what they would prefer as a desirable type of map to use for an analytical decision-making process and then their performance of this process was measured. To ensure the validity of the experiment, maps used for this study were designed using a social background as their theme, with analysts being asked to decide where to invest public funds. The same experiment was conducted first using a subset of paper maps (1st stage) and then using interactive web maps (2nd stage). Three types of subsets of thematic maps were assigned randomly among the respondents. Statistical tests were applied and the correlation between preference and performance in this experiment was measured. Results for the 1st step show that there is no significant variation due to the technique used in the performance tests, and for this specific subject, there is insufficient evidence to guarantee that user's preference among map techniques can lead or is related to better performance. Also it was noted that performance decreases for a reasoning related task, and maybe this could be related to the need for a deeper analysis of data evolution through time.
    12/2010: pages 163-181;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The characterization, identification, and understanding of spatial patterns are central concerns of geography. Deeply rooted in the notion that geographic location matters, one testable assumption is that near things are more related than distant things—a concept often referred to as Tobler's first law of geography. One means of quantifying this assumption is using measures of spatial autocorrelation. Several such measures have been developed to test whether a pattern is indeed clustered, or dispersed, or whether it is, from a statistical perspective, random. To shed light on how spatial patterns are understood from a cognitive perspective, this article reports results from studies of spatial pattern interpretation represented in maps. For the purpose of experimental validation, we used a two-color map. We systematically varied the ratio of the colors as well as the level of significance of clustering and dispersion; we targeted two groups: experts and nonexperts. The task for both experts and nonexperts was to sort patterns according to five specified categories of spatial autocorrelation structures. The results show clearly that patterns are understood on the basis of the dominant color, by both experts and nonexperts. A third experiment, using a free classification paradigm, confirmed the dominance of the color effect. These results are important, as they point to critical aspects of pattern perception and understanding that need to be addressed from the perspective of spatial thinking, especially how people relate concepts of randomness with spatial patterns (represented in maps). La caracterización, identificación y entendimiento de los patrones espaciales son preocupaciones centrales de la geografía. Profundamente arraigada en la noción de que la localización geográfica importa, un supuesto probable es que las cosas cercanas tienen más relación que las cosas distantes – concepto a menudo referido como la primera ley de la geografía de Tobler. Uno de los medios para cuantificar este supuesto es el uso de medidas de autocorrelación espacial. Varias de tales medidas han sido desarrolladas para probar si un patrón en verdad es aglomerado, o disperso, o si desde una perspectiva estadística es aleatorio. Para aclarar cómo son entendidos los patrones espaciales desde una perspectiva cognitiva, este artículo informa sobre estudios de interpretación de patrones espaciales representados en mapas. Nosotros utilizamos dos mapas a color para los efectos de validación experimental. Sistemáticamente variamos la razón de los colores lo mismo que el nivel de significación de la aglomeración y la dispersión; pusimos la mira en dos grupos: expertos e inexpertos. La tarea para ambos grupos fue igual, o sea clasificar los patrones de acuerdo con cinco categorías específicas de estructuras de autocorrelación espacial. Los resultados claramente muestran que los patrones son entendidos con base en el color dominante, tanto por expertos como inexpertos. Un tercer experimento, en el que se utilizó un paradigma de clasificación libre, confirmó el dominio del efecto del color. Tales resultados son importantes en la medida en que éstos apuntan a aspectos críticos del patrón de percepción y entendimiento que necesita abocarse desde la perspectiva del pensar espacial, especialmente cómo la gente relaciona conceptos de aleatoriedad con patrones espaciales (representados en mapas).
    Annals of the Association of American Geographers 09/2011; 101(5):1011-1031. · 2.17 Impact Factor


Available from