Multimodel ensemble simulations of present-day and near-future tropospheric ozone

J. Geophys. Res 01/2006; 111:D08301. DOI: 10.1029/2005JD006338
Source: OAI

ABSTRACT Global tropospheric ozone distributions, budgets, and radiative forcings from an ensemble of 26 state-of-the-art atmospheric chemistry models have been intercompared and synthesized as part of a wider study into both the air quality and climate roles of ozone. Results from three 2030 emissions scenarios, broadly representing “optimistic,” “likely,” and “pessimistic” options, are compared to a base year 2000 simulation. This base case realistically represents the current global distribution of tropospheric ozone. A further set of simulations considers the influence of climate change over the same time period by forcing the central emissions scenario with a surface warming of around 0.7K. The use of a large multimodel ensemble allows us to identify key areas of uncertainty and improves the robustness of the results. Ensemble mean changes in tropospheric ozone burden between 2000 and 2030 for the 3 scenarios range from a 5% decrease, through a 6% increase, to a 15% increase. The intermodel uncertainty (±1 standard deviation) associated with these values is about ±25%. Model outliers have no significant influence on the ensemble mean results. Combining ozone and methane changes, the three scenarios produce radiative forcings of −50, 180, and 300 mW m−2, compared to a CO2 forcing over the same time period of 800–1100 mW m−2. These values indicate the importance of air pollution emissions in short- to medium-term climate forcing and the potential for stringent/lax control measures to improve/worsen future climate forcing. The model sensitivity of ozone to imposed climate change varies between models but modulates zonal mean mixing ratios by ±5 ppbv via a variety of feedback mechanisms, in particular those involving water vapor and stratosphere-troposphere exchange. This level of climate change also reduces the methane lifetime by around 4%. The ensemble mean year 2000 tropospheric ozone budget indicates chemical production, chemical destruction, dry deposition and stratospheric input fluxes of 5100, 4650, 1000, and 550 Tg(O3) yr−1, respectively. These values are significantly different to the mean budget documented by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Third Assessment Report (TAR). The mean ozone burden (340 Tg(O3)) is 10% larger than the IPCC TAR estimate, while the mean ozone lifetime (22 days) is 10% shorter. Results from individual models show a correlation between ozone burden and lifetime, and each model's ozone burden and lifetime respond in similar ways across the emissions scenarios. The response to climate change is much less consistent. Models show more variability in the tropics compared to midlatitudes. Some of the most uncertain areas of the models include treatments of deep tropical convection, including lightning NO x production; isoprene emissions from vegetation and isoprene's degradation chemistry; stratosphere-troposphere exchange; biomass burning; and water vapor concentrations.

1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: All along their life, plants and trees are exposed to various stresses, and particularly to abiotic ones. Ozone (O3) is one of the most important air pollutants, whose ground levels keep increasing as a result of climate change. High O3 concentrations deeply affect plants and cells, and impact worldwide crop and forest production. In plant leaves, O3 directly interferes with surface tissues or reaches mesophyll cells through stomata. In this case, O3 is almost immediately degraded into reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the apoplastic space of plant cells. For plants to acclimate to O3, the O3 stress signal has to be perceived at the cellular level and relayed to the nucleus to lead to cell reprogramming. The aim of this review is to focus on different O3-sensing localizations, i.e., epicuticular waxes, the cell wall and the plasma membrane, and to detail the different early signaling components related to these sites – in particular lipids, membrane proteins (G proteins, NADPH oxidases and ion channels) and MAP kinases. Finally, some interesting putative membrane-related O3 signaling components are presented as clues to be validated in future investigations.
    Environmental and Experimental Botany 06/2015; 114. DOI:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.11.012 · 3.00 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ozone (O) is implicated in the natural source inventory of ClO, a hydrophilic salt that migrates to groundwater and interferes with the uptake of iodide in mammals, including humans. Tropospheric O is elevated in many urban and some rural areas in the United States and globally. We previously showed that controlled O exposure at near-ambient concentrations (up to 114 nL L, 12-h mean) did not increase foliar ClO. Under laboratory conditions, O has been shown to oxidize Cl to ClO. Plant tissues contain Cl and exhibit responses to O invoking redox reactions. As higher levels of O are associated with stratospheric incursion and with developing megacities, we have hypothesized that exposure of vegetation to such elevated O may increase foliar ClO. This would contribute to ClO in environments without obvious point sources. At these high O concentrations (up to 204 nL L, 12-h mean; 320 nL L maximum), we demonstrated an increase in the ClO concentration in surface soil that was linearly related to the O concentration. There was no relationship of foliar ClO with O exposure or dose (stomatal uptake). Accumulation of ClO varied among species at low O, but this was not related to soil surface ClO or to foliar ClO concentrations following exposure to O. These data extend our previous conclusions to the highest levels of plausible O exposure, that tropospheric O contributes to environmental ClO through interaction with the soil but not through increased foliar ClO. Copyright © by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.
    Journal of Environmental Quality 07/2014; 43(4):1460-6. DOI:10.2134/jeq2013.11.0464 · 2.35 Impact Factor
  • Source

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 22, 2014