Transmission of DNA Genetic Information into Water by means of Electromagnetic Fields of Extremely-low Frequencies

Transmission of DNA Genetic Information into Water by means
of Electromagnetic Fields of Extremely-low Frequencies

Fran De Aquino
Maranhao State University, Physics Department, S.Luis/MA, Brazil.
Copyright © 2012 by Fran De Aquino. All Rights Reserved.

Recently it was experimentally shown that the DNA genetic information can be transmitted into water when
the DNA and the water are subjected jointly to an electromagnetic field with 7Hz frequency. As announced,
the reported phenomenon could allow developing highly sensitive detection systems for chronic bacterial and
viral infections. Here, it is shown a possible explanation for the phenomenon based on the recent framework
of Quantum Gravity. It is shown that, if volume of water with a DNA molecule is placed near another
volume of pure water, and the gravitational masses of the two water volumes are simultaneously reduced to
values in the range + 0.159mi0 to − 0.159mi0, by means of electromagnetic fields of extremely-low frequency
(ELF), then the DNA genetic information are transmitted to pure water, imprinting onto it the structure of the
DNA molecule. After several hours, as final result, a replication of the DNA can arise in the pure water.

Key words: DNA, Modified theories of gravity, Experimental studies of gravity, Memory of Water.
PACS: 87.14.gk , 04.50.Kd , 04.80.-y, 41.20.Jb.

1. Introduction

A recent experiment showed that the
DNA genetic information can be transmitted
into water when the DNA and the water are
subjected jointly to an electromagnetic field
with 7Hz frequency. The main researcher
behind the new DNA experiment is a recent
Nobel prizewinner, Luc Montagnier. He and
his research partners have made a summary of
his findings [1]. Montagnier’s experiment
basically consists in two test tubes, one of
which contained a tiny piece of bacterial
DNA, the other pure water. The tubes were
then placed close to one another inside a
horizontally oriented solenoid. Both tubes
were jointly subjected to a weak
electromagnetic field with 7Hz frequency.
Eighteen hours later, after DNA amplification
using a polymerase chain reaction, as if by
magic, the DNA was detectable in the test tube
containing pure water, showing that, under
certain conditions, DNA can project copies of
itself in another place.
As mentioned in a recently published
article in the New Scientist [2], ‘physicists in
Montagnier's team suggest that DNA emits
low-frequency electromagnetic waves which
imprint the structure of the molecule onto the
water. This structure, they claim, is preserved
and amplified through quantum coherence
effects, and because it mimics the shape of the
original DNA, the enzymes in the PCR
process mistake it for DNA itself, and
somehow use it as a template to make DNA
match that which "sent" the signal’.
Here, based on the framework of a
recently proposed theory of Quantum Gravity
[3], is presented a consistent explanation
showing how an exact copy of the structure of
the DNA molecule is imprinted onto the pure
water.

2. Theory

The quantization of gravity showed
that the gravitational mass mg and inertial
mass mi are correlated by means of the
following factor [3]:
( )11121
2
00 ⎪⎭
⎪⎬
⎫
⎪⎩
⎪⎨
⎧
⎥⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡
−⎟⎟⎠
⎞
⎜⎜⎝
⎛ Δ+−=
cm
p
m
m
ii
g
where is the rest inertial mass of the
particle and
0im
pΔ is the variation in the
particle’s kinetic momentum; is the speed of
light.
c
When pΔ is produced by the absorption
of a photon with wavelengthλ , it is expressed
by λhp =Δ . In this case, Eq. (1) becomes
( )21121
1121
2
0
2
0
0
⎪⎭
⎪⎬
⎫
⎪⎩
⎪⎨
⎧
⎥⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡
−⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎝
⎛+−=
⎪⎭
⎪⎬
⎫
⎪⎩
⎪⎨
⎧
⎥⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡
−⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎝
⎛+−=
λ
λ
λ
cmh
m
m i
i
g
where cmh i00 =λ is the De Broglie
wavelength for the particle with rest inertial
mass . 0im

2
It is easily seen that cannot be
strongly reduced simply by using
electromagnetic waves with wavelength
gm
λ
because 0λ is much smaller than .
However, it is known that the wavelength of a
radiation can be strongly reduced simply by
strongly reducing its velocity.
m1010−
From Electrodynamics we know that
when an electromagnetic wave with frequency
and velocity incides on a material with
relative permittivity
f c
rε , relative magnetic
permeability rμ and electrical conductivity
σ , its velocity is reduced to rncv = where
is the index of refraction of the material,
given by [
rn
3]
( ) ( )311
2
2 ⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎝
⎛ ++== ωεσμε rrr v
c
n
If ωεσ >> , fπω 2= , the Eq. (3) reduces to
( )4
4 0 f
n rr πε
σμ=
Thus, the wavelength of the incident radiation
becomes
( )54mod σμ
πλλ
fnn
fc
f
v
rr
====








Fig. 1 – Modified Electromagnetic Wave. The
wavelength of the electromagnetic wave can be
strongly reduced, but its frequency remains the same.
v = c v = c/nr
λ = c/f λmod = v/f = c/nr f
nr

Now consider a ( )
radiation incident on pure water
( ). According to Eq. (5), the
modified wavelength is
Hz7 m7103.4 ×≅λ
mS /102 4−×=σ
( )6104.84 4mod mf ×== σμ
πλ
Consequently, the wavelength of the
radiation inside the water will be
and not .
Hz7
m4mod 104.8 ×=λ m7103.4 ×≅λ
If a water lamina with thickness equal
toξ contains n molecules/m3, then the number of
molecules per unit area is ξn . Thus, if the
electromagnetic radiation with frequency
incides on an area of the lamina it
reaches
f S
ξnS molecules. If it incides on the total
area of the lamina, , then the total number of
molecules reached by the radiation is
fS
ξfnSN = .
The number of molecules per unit volume, n , is
given by
( )70
A
N
n
ρ=
where is the
Avogadro’s number;
kmolemoleculesN /1002.6 260 ×=
ρ is the matter density of the
lamina(kg/m3)and A is the Molar Mass. In the case
of pure Water ( )133 .01.18,/10 −== kmolekgAmkgρ
the result is
( )8/1034.3 328 mmoleculesnwater ×=
The total number of photons inciding on
the water is 2hfPn photonstotal = , where P is the
power of the radiation flux incident on the water.
When an electromagnetic wave incides
on the water, it strikes on front molecules,
where
fN( ) mff nSN φ≅ . Thus, the wave incides
effectively on an area , where mf SNS =
2212
4
1 107 mS mm
−×≅= πφ is the cross
section area of one molecule of the water
molecule. After these collisions, it carries out
with the other atoms of the foil (See
Fig.2).
collisionsn










Fig. 2 – Collisions inside the water.
water
molecule
Sm
Wave

Thus, the total number of collisions in the
volume ξS is

3( )
( )9ξ
δξδ
nS
nSnSnSnNN ffcollisionsfcollisions
=
=−+=+=

The power density, , of the radiation on the
water can be expressed by
D
( )10
mf SN
P
S
P
D ==
We can express the total mean number
of collisions in each molecule, , by means of
the following equation
1n
( )111 N
Nn
n collisionsphotonstotal=
Since in each collision a momentum λh is
transferred to the molecule, then the total
momentum transferred to the water will be ( ) λhNnp 1=Δ . Therefore, in accordance
with Eq. (1), we can write that
( )
( )121121
1121
2
0
2
0
1
0
⎪⎭
⎪⎬
⎫
⎪⎩
⎪⎨
⎧
⎥⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡
−⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡+−=
=
⎪⎭
⎪⎬
⎫
⎪⎩
⎪⎨
⎧
⎥⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡
−⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡+−=
λ
λ
λ
λ
collisionsphotonstotal
i
g
Nn
Nn
m
m

Since Eq. (9) gives ξnSNcollisions = , we get
( ) (13
2
ξnS
hf
P
Nn collisionsphotonstotal ⎟⎟⎠
⎞
⎜⎜⎝
⎛= )
Substitution of Eq. (13) into Eq. (12) yields
( ) ( )141121
2
0
2
0 ⎪⎭
⎪⎬
⎫
⎪⎩
⎪⎨
⎧
⎥⎥
⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢⎢
⎢
⎣
⎡
−
⎥⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡
⎟⎟⎠
⎞
⎜⎜⎝
⎛+−= λ
λξnS
hf
P
m
m
i
g
Substitution of P given by Eq. (10) into Eq.
(14) gives

( )1511121
2
0
2
0 ⎪⎭
⎪⎬
⎫
⎪⎩
⎪⎨
⎧
⎥⎥
⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢⎢
⎢
⎣
⎡
−
⎥⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡
⎟⎟⎠
⎞
⎜⎜⎝
⎛
⎟⎟⎠
⎞
⎜⎜⎝
⎛+−= λ
ξ
cm
nS
f
DSN
m
m
i
mf
i
g

Substitution of ( ) mff nSN φ≅ and mf SNS =
into Eq. (15) the result is
( )1611121
1
1
121
2
2
223
2
2
0
2223
0
⎪⎭
⎪⎬
⎫
⎪⎩
⎪⎨
⎧
⎥⎥
⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢⎢
⎢
⎣
⎡
−⎥⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡
⎟⎟⎠
⎞
⎜⎜⎝
⎛
+−=
⎪⎭
⎪⎬
⎫
⎪⎩
⎪⎨
⎧
⎥⎥
⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢⎢
⎢
⎣
⎡
−⎥⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡
⎟⎟⎠
⎞
⎜⎜⎝
⎛+−=
λρ
φ
λ
ξφ
cf
DSSn
cfm
DSSn
m
m
fmm
i
mmf
i
g

In the case of the water, we can take the
following values: ;
( fS is the area of the
horizontal cross-section of the test tube);
; ;
328 /1034.3 mmoleculesn ×=
25109.1 mS f
−×≅
221107 mSm
−×≅ mm 1≅ 1010−×φ ξ (height of
water inside the test tube). Substitution of
these values into Eq. (16), gives
( )
( )
( )1711101.1121
2
2
9
0 ⎪⎭
⎪⎬
⎫
⎪⎩
⎪⎨
⎧
⎥⎥
⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢⎢
⎢
⎣
⎡
−
⎥⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡
⎟⎟⎠
⎞
⎜⎜⎝
⎛ ×+−= λf
D
m
m
wateri
waterg
In the case of a 7Hz radiation, Eq. (6)
shows that . Thus, by
substitution of
m4mod 104.8 ×=λ
λ by modλ into Eqs. (17) , we
get the following expression
( )
( )
[ ]{ } ( )181101.7121 24
0
−×+−≅ D
m
m
wateri
waterg
Now, considering that the water is inside a
solenoid, which produces a weak ELF
electromagnetic field with and , then
we can write that [
mE mB
4]
( )
( )19
222 0
2
0
22
0
2
water
m
water
mwater
water
m
n
cB
v
Bv
v
E
D μμμ ===
Equation (4) shows that for Hzf 7= ,
( ) 7.506=waterrn .Substitution of this value
into Eq.(19) gives
211103.2 mBD ×=
Substitution of this value into Eq. (19) gives

( )
( )
[ ]{ } ( )201107.3121 427
0
−×+−≅ m
wateri
waterg B
m
m

4














Fig. 3 – The vector of Pointing BES
rrr ×= at
the test tube. The electromagnetic radiation
propagates in the direction of the vector of
Pointing
E
r

B
r
ξ
S
r

fS
Coil
Test tube

In Montagnier’s experiment, the set-up
was placed in a container shielded by 1 mm
thick layer of mumetal in order to avoid
interference from the earth's natural magnetic
field, whose intensity is . This
is because the intensity of magnetic field in
Montagnier’s experiment was much smaller
than . Note that, if the intensity of the
magnetic field is in the range
, then, according
to Eq. (20), the gravitational masses of the
water with DNA and the water inside the other
test tube are reduced to values in the range
to . It was shown in a
previous paper [
TB 5106 −⊕ ×≅
⊕B
TBT m
77 104.1102.1 −− ×<<×
0159.0 im+ 0159.0 im−
3] that, when this occurs the
gravitational masses becomes imaginaries and
the bodies leave our Real Universe, i.e., they
perform transitions to the Imaginary Universe,
which contains our Real Universe. The terms
real and imaginary are borrowed from
mathematics (real and imaginary numbers). It
was also shown that in the Imaginary
Universe the imaginary bodies are subjected
to the Imaginary Interaction that is similar to
the Gravitational Interaction. If the masses of
the bodies have the same sign, then the
interaction among them will be attractive.
The masses of the water with DNA and
the pure water are decreased at the same ratio,









(a)











(b)











(c)






(d)



Fig. 4 – (a) Transition to the Imaginary Universe and
attraction. (b) Fusion of the two waters. (c) Return to
Real Universe. (d) After several comings and goings to
the Imaginary Universe a real copy of the DNA can be
detected in the tube with pure water.
F
Imaginary Universe
Real Universe
Imaginary Universe
Real Universe
Imaginary Universe
Real Universe
1
F
Imaginary Universe
Real Universe
DNA
First impression of
DNA into water. It is a
tenuous copy that
cannot yet be detected.
waterWater with DNA
Test tube
with water
Test tube
with water
and DNA
Fusion of the two waters.
The DNA prints a tenuous
copy of itself in the water
of the second tube.
2
After several hours
the copy of the
DNA is sufficiently
intensified in order
to be detected

5
in such way that they remain with the same
sign. Thus, when they arrive the Imaginary
Universe the attractive imaginary interaction
approaches each other. Due to the small
distance between them*, they are subjected to
a significative attraction. Consequently, they
entered one another (fusion). This imprints in
the pure water an exactly copy of the DNA
molecule. However, the water with DNA and
the pure water return immediately to the real
universe because the ELF electromagnetic
field does not accompany them during the
transition. When they get back to the real
universe, the effect previously produced by
the ELF electromagnetic field sends again the
water with DNA and pure water to Imaginary
Universe, and again a new imprint of the
DNA is produced at the same place of the first
one, strengthening the copy of DNA onto the
water.
Thus, during the time interval in what
the ELF electromagnetic field remains on, the
process continue. After some hours (16 to 18
hours in the case of Montagnier’s experiment)
the copy of the DNA can become sufficiently
strong to be detected. Thus, when the ELF
electromagnetic field is turned off, the water
can contain a real DNA molecule, which is an
exactly equal to that one that exists in the
other tube.
The physicists in Montagnier's team
suggest that the imprints of the DNA are
preserved through quantum coherence effects
[1]. This conclusion is based on the
framework of a recently proposed theory of
liquid water based on Quantum Field Theory
(QFT) [5-10]. Jacques Benveniste [11] has
been the first to propose (1988) that water has
memory. The fact that the water contains
electric dipoles, which can give to it a
significant memory capacity, has been also
considered by Brian Josephson [12] and, more
recently by J. Dunning-Davies [13].






* Due to the small distance between the two test tubes. The
tubes were then placed near to one another inside a
horizontally oriented solenoid.

6

References

[1] L. Montagnier, J. Aissa, E. Del Giudice, C. Lavalee,
A. Tedeschi, and G. Vitiello, “DNA Waves and
Water,” (2010) http://arxiv.org/pdf/1012.5166

[2] Coghlan, A. (2011) Scorn over claim of teleported DNA,
New Scientist, 12 January.

[3] De Aquino, F. (2010) Mathematical Foundations of the
Relativistic Theory of Quantum Gravity, Pacific Journal
of Science and Technology, 11 (1), pp. 173-232.

[4] Halliday, D. and Resnick, R. (1968)
Physics, J. Willey & Sons,
Portuguese Version, Ed. USP, p.1124.

[5] Preparata G 1995 QED Coherence in matter (Singapore:
World Scientific)

[6] Arani R, Bono I, Del Giudice E, Preparata G 1995 Int. J.
Mod. Phys. B 9 1813–1841

[7] Del Giudice E, Preparata G and Vitiello G 1988 Phys.
Rev. Lett. 61 1085–1088

[8] Del Giudice E and Vitiello G 2006 Phys. Rev. A 74
022105

[9] Del Giudice E and Tedeschi A 2009 Electr. Biol. Med.
26 48–54

[10] Del Giudice E, Spinetti P R and Tedeschi A 2010
Water 2 566–586 (online Journal).

[11] Benveniste, Jacques (2005) Ma vérité sur la 'mémoire
de l'eau', Albin Michel. ISBN 2-226-15877-4.

[12] Brian Josephson (1997) Molecule Memories, New
Scientist letters, 1 November.

[13] J. Dunning-Davies (2011) Structure and Memory in
Water, General Science and Philosophy,
vixra.org/abs/1101.0081