Article

Detecting Hidden Differences via Permutation Symmetries

Physical Review A (Impact Factor: 2.99). 12/2006; 78(3). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.033832
Source: arXiv

ABSTRACT We present a method for describing and characterizing the state of N
particles that may be distinguishable in principle but not in practice due to
experimental limitations. The technique relies upon a careful treatment of the
exchange symmetry of the state among experimentally accessible and
experimentally inaccessible degrees of freedom. The approach we present allows
a new formalisation of the notion of indistinguishability and can be
implemented easily using currently available experimental techniques. Our work
is of direct relevance to current experiments in quantum optics, for which we
provide a specific implementation.

Full-text

Available from: Morgan W. Mitchell, Oct 26, 2013
0 Followers
 · 
62 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Indistinguishability of subsystems is a requirement for quantum interference, which is in turn the workhorse of extra-classical demonstrations such as those proposed in quantum information protocols. However, indistinguishability does not arise in the standard axioms of quantum mechanics. Once the standard textbook approach is assumed, the pure states of the system in question are conventionally restricted to a Hilbert subspace with permutation symmetry. From the tomographic perspective, this is unacceptable, as such an assumption of symmetry can be too restrictive. Here we report two approaches to the problem of multiple bosons that admit both distinguishable and indistinguishable states of the same system. In doing so we define two notions of distinguishability. Both approaches are shown to give the same results in the sense that they predict the same restriction on density matrices as would be reconstructed tomographically. The number of unknown elements is polynomial in the number of particles, in stark contrast to the distinguishable case which scales exponentially. We use this picture to investigate possible measurement schemes which could detect and/or characterise indistinguishability.
    10/2011; DOI:10.1063/1.3630151
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Data compression is a ubiquitous aspect of modern information technology, and the advent of quantum information raises the question of what types of compression are feasible for quantum data, where it is especially relevant given the extreme difficulty involved in creating reliable quantum memories. We present a protocol in which an ensemble of quantum bits (qubits) can in principle be perfectly compressed into exponentially fewer qubits. We then experimentally implement our algorithm, compressing three photonic qubits into two. This protocol sheds light on the subtle differences between quantum and classical information. Furthermore, since data compression stores all of the available information about the quantum state in fewer physical qubits, it could provide a vast reduction in the amount of quantum memory required to store a quantum ensemble, making even today's limited quantum memories far more powerful than previously recognized.
    Physical Review Letters 10/2014; 113(16). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.160504 · 7.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Quantum state tomography suffers from the measurement effort increasing exponentially with the number of qubits. Here, we demonstrate permutationally invariant tomography for which, contrary to conventional tomography, all resources scale polynomially with the number of qubits both in terms of the measurement effort as well as the computational power needed to process and store the recorded data. We demonstrate the benefits of combining permutationally invariant tomography with compressed sensing by studying the influence of the pump power on the noise present in a six-qubit symmetric Dicke state, a case where full tomography is possible only for very high pump powers.
    Physical Review Letters 07/2014; 113(4):040503. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.040503 · 7.73 Impact Factor