Distribution of bone remodeling units in the otic capsule of the rabbit. A semiquantitative morphometric study.

Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Acta Oto-Laryngologica (Impact Factor: 0.99). 02/1992; 112(3):462-9. DOI: 10.3109/00016489209137427
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Distribution of bone remodeling units (BRU) in relation to the perilymphatic space was studied in undecalcified temporal bones from adult rabbits labeled in vivo with bone-seeking fluorochromes. Based on recordings of focal bone formation, relative densities of BRUs inside concentric tissue zones around the inner ear spaces were estimated. Zonal densities of BRUs were found to decline towards the perilymphatic space, lending further support to the existence of a local inner ear mechanism in control of capsular bone tissue dynamics. The possible nature of this mechanism is considered briefly with special reference to inner ear electromechanic activity.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the compact bony otic capsule remodeling is low, and bone remodeling units are distributed centrifugally in relation to inner ear tissues and spaces. Fluorochrome-labeled bone remodeling units are scarce, abortive, and tortuous with no uniform direction of movement. This study presents a method for the estimation of volume-referent bone turnover based on measurements of the fractional area between labels after sequential labeling with osteofluorochromes. The applicability of this method is tested against a classical quantification method in undecalcified cortical specimens from the canine humerus, where both methods can be used. The estimate of bone turnover derived from the new sequential labeling in eight dogs is 7.4% (SEM 2.1%) per year and the classic estimate derived from calculations of the formative osteonal area and the formative period yields 6.9% (SEM 2.1%) per year. Agreement is sufficient to justify future measurements of absolute bone turnover in sequentially labeled perilabyrinthine bone.
    Bone 07/1998; 22(6):677-82. DOI:10.1016/S8756-3282(98)00050-7 · 4.46 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Distribution of secondary osteons labeled in vivo with tetracycline as a result of therapeutic administration of this drug during adult life was studied in undecalcified human temporal bones. Labeled osteons were recorded in relation to concentric 200 pm wide perilabyrinthine zones of compact capsular bone. The total osteonal count varied among individual bones, but since a centrifugal distribution of labeled osteons with respect to inner ear spaces was suggested in all specimens, all acquisitions were averaged. Zonal densities of labeled osteons were found to decline towards the perilymphatic space suggesting a role of inner ear tissues in the spatial organization of human perilabyrinthine bone behaviour.
    Acta Oto-Laryngologica 07/2009; 112(s496):4-10. DOI:10.3109/00016489209136839 · 0.99 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Morphological aspects of normal bone remodeling were studied in 20 undecalcified human temporal bones of which 8 specimens contained secondary bone labeled with tetracycline during adult life. The results of microradiography, UV-microscopy and histochemical staining indicate that interglobular spaces and osseous globules of endochondral otic capsular bone are primary trabeculae formed exclusively during fetal endochondral ossification. This primary spongiosa while being subject to discrete osteonal remodeling could not be identified as a source of “osteocytic” remodeling. The lifelong persistence of capsular primary spongiosa is consistent with the unique spatial organization of perilabyrinthine bone tissue dynamics. Residual uncalcified cartilage was present only at the fissula ante fenestram and fossula post fenestram where newly formed osteonal bone was frequently found. The results suggest that capsular bone remodeling is exclusively quantum based.
    Acta Oto-Laryngologica 07/2009; 112(s496):11-19. DOI:10.3109/00016489209136840 · 0.99 Impact Factor