Article

A prospective study of pyrogenic reactions in hemodialysis patients using bicarbonate dialysis fluids filtered to remove bacteria and endotoxin.

Hospital Infections Program, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (Impact Factor: 8.99). 11/1992; 3(4):1002-7.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Pyrogenic reactions (PR) are a well-recognized complication of hemodialysis and have been associated with dialyzer reuse, high-flux dialysis, and bicarbonate dialysate. However, the roles of bacteria and endotoxin in dialysate for producing PR are not well defined. To determine the effect of removing most bacteria and endotoxin from the dialysate on the incidence of PR, a cohort of chronic hemodialysis patients receiving high-flux, high-efficiency, or conventional hemodialysis at three centers with bicarbonate dialysis fluids that had been filtered with a polysulfone high-flux hemodialyzer was prospectively studied. Unfiltered bicarbonate concentrate had median bacterial and endotoxin concentrations of 479,000 CFU/mL and 39,800 pg/mL, respectively. After filtration of the bicarbonate concentrate at the central proportioner, dialysate had a median 9.2 CFU/mL of bacteria and 17.8 pg/mL of endotoxin. Dialysate filtered at individual proportioning dialysis machines had a median 0.001 CFU/mL of bacteria and 0.19 pg/mL of endotoxin. Nine PR were identified among 303 patients after 28,007 hemodialysis treatments (0.3 PR/1,000 treatments). The rate of PR was similar for the three hemodialysis treatment modalities and for first-use compared with reused dialyzers. Although the PR rate in this study was lower (P = 0.046) than the PR rate of a previous study with unfiltered dialysis fluids (0.7 PR/1,000 treatments), it represents a difference of only 10 PR in over 28,000 treatments. It was concluded that filtration of hemodialysis fluids is efficacious in removing bacterial and endotoxin contamination and can result in a lower incidence of PR in patients receiving high-flux, high-efficiency, or conventional hemodialysis.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
193 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess the bacteriological quality of dialysis fluid in 2 hemodialysis units in Alexandria, Egypt. A total of 321 samples of hemodialysis fluids, 213 from unit A (a governmental unit), 108 from unit B (a private unit), both under the supervision of ministry of health, were collected from the water treatment system (WTS), treated water, concentrates, and final dialysate from the beginning of March to the end of August 2005. Samples were analyzed for enumeration of the total viable heterotrophic bacteria using the standard pour plate method, and for the determination of the total coliforms (TC) using the presence/absence method. Fifty samples were also examined for endotoxin detection by the Limulus Amoebocyte Lysate assay (LAL), employing the gel clot method. Percentages of acceptable samples of WTS were 67% from unit A and 66.7% from unit B, while the dialysate samples showed higher acceptability at unit B (86.1%) than unit A (51.7%). Eleven samples were detected as having TC. The LAL assay showed a range of 57-100% of samples exceeded 0.25 EU/ml. Analysis of these results and comparing them to other variables is further discussed. The results demonstrate that hemodialysis centers need monitoring and preventive maintenance in order to ensure renal replacement therapy of good quality.
    Saudi medical journal 09/2007; 28(8):1234-8. · 0.62 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: During hemodialysis, blood comes in contact with a large volume of dialysate. Since the purity of dialysate has been linked to acute and long-term complications in hemodialysis patients, the limit of bacterial and endotoxin contamination has been reduced in recent years. Questions have been raised as to whether ultrapure dialysate is required to prevent such complications; in particular, the chronic inflammatory status frequently found in chronically hemodialyzed patients. In vivo and in vitro data suggest that cytokine stimulation in the blood depends on the concentration of bacteria or endotoxin in the dialysate and on the endotoxin permeability of the dialysis membrane. It is not proven whether ultrapure dialysate reduces significantly proinflammatory cytokine generation compared with standard dialysate within the limits of recent recommendations, if rather impermeable dialysis membranes are used. Cuprophane membranes are more permeable to cytokine-inducing substances compared with synthetic membranes such as polysulfone and polyamide. Clinical reports have also attempted to link several acute and chronic complications of hemodialysis to dialysate purity. To date, however, there is no large randomized clinical trial demonstrating that ultrapure dialysate significantly reduces biomarkers of inflammation and other consequential putative complications, including dialysis-related amyloidosis, erythropoietin requirement, and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In conclusion, based on the existing clinical data, ultrapure dialysate is recommended in the setting of suboptimal bacteriologic quality of standard dialysate and the use of permeable dialysis membranes.
    Seminars in Dialysis 02/2006; 19(2):115-9. · 2.25 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the mid-1980s, limits and side effects of contemporary hemodialysis were basically due to short treatment time, use of low-flux membranes and employment of acetate-buffered dialysate. These were already associated with a relatively high morbidity and cardiovascular mortality as part of diaysis-related pathology. Based on these considerations, the concept of on-line hemodiafiltration (HDF) was proposed as an innovative solution. By combining diffusive and convective clearances, HDF offered the most efficient modality to clear small and middle-sized uremic toxins. Furthermore, by using ultrapure dialysis fluid and high-flux synthetic membranes, HDF also offered the most biocompatible dialysis system, thereby going a long way towards preventing inflammation. Through provision of virtually unlimited amounts of sterile dialysis fluid by cold sterilization of fresh dialysate, on-line HDF offered an economical and viable method of conducting high-efficiency HDF (high volume exchange) therapy. By keeping the hemodialysis machine with all built-in technical options (e.g. adjustable blood pump, fluid-balancing system, conductivity meter, flow and pressure monitoring, bicarbonate-buffered dialysate), HDF benefited from being associated with the use of dialysis machines with excellent technology as well as highest safety standards. Use of ultrapure water made it then possible to produce dialysis fluid of intravenous grade quality with these machines. The first on-line HDF clinical trial was performed with a modified A2008C dialysis machine in 1984-85. This confirmed the feasibility and potential of the on-line HDF method. Some 25 years later, on-line HDF has proven to be safe, efficacious and with clinical benefits that justify it becoming a new standard for high-quality care of chronic kidney patients.
    Contributions to nephrology 01/2011; 175:93-109. · 1.49 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
37 Downloads
Available from
May 23, 2014