Angiographic resteno-sis after successful Wallstent implantation: An analysis of risk predictors
Royal Brompton National Heart and Lung Hospital, Department of Invasive Cardiology, London, U.K.American Heart Journal (Impact Factor: 4.46). 01/1993; 124(6):1473-7. DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(92)90059-5
Follow-up angiographic study was performed in 86 patients after initially successful Wallstent stent (Medinvent, Lausanne, Switzerland) implantation between April 1986 and October 1990. The stent angiographic restenosis rate was 16% at a mean of 8 months after stenting despite the inclusion of a substantial number of patients at high risk of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Of a total 15 variables analyzed, only suboptimal stent placement was found to be a significant predictor of stent restenosis. Age; gender; baseline New York Heart Association functional class; previous PTCA; indication for stenting; left ventricular ejection fraction; preangioplasty and immediate postangioplasty diameter stenosis severity; stented vessel site, lesional morphology; number, diameter, and length of stents implanted; and the interval between stenting and follow-up angiographic restudy were not significant risk factors of stent restenosis. Our study suggests that intracoronary stent implantation with the Wallstent may be a useful and promising adjunctive option after PTCA, particularly in patients at high risk of restenosis after PTCA. However, because of the significantly enhanced risk of restenosis after suboptimal stent implantation, we strongly recommend the selection and placement of Wallstent stents that adequately cover the entire length of the dilated coronary segment.
- Journal of Interventional Cardiology 09/1993; 6(3):241-269. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8183.1993.tb00864.x · 1.18 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Percutaneous cardiopulmonary assist devices (PCPS) have become available in interventional cardiology within recent years. These tools offer the opportunity of performing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in high-risk patients characterized by significant stenoses of several coronary arteries and a poor left ventricular function. It is unclear for which patients PCPS are necessary and which patients will profit by PTCA as compared to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Therefore, the anticipated risk of CABG and of PTCA without assist devices was calculated according to risk scores and compared with our results of assisted PTCA. In addition the long-term survival rate was investigated. In 35 patients (mean 65.5 years of age, 12 females, 23 males), we performed PTCA concomitant with the use of cardiac assist devices. The indications for the use of a cardiac assist device were severely impaired LV function (EF 30% ± 8.9%) in combination with significant coronary artery disease (2.7 ± 0.3 vessels) and a significant supply area of the vessel to be dilated. In 6 patients, PCPS was started before coronary angioplasty because of hemodynamic instability. In 21 cases, PCPS was on a standby basis without being connected to the patient's circulation. In 8 patients, a left heart assist device, the 14F-Hemopump, was inserted percutaneously. The patients were analyzed using risk scores of angioplasty and of coronary bypass graft surgery. The calculated risk of hemodynamic compromise during PTCA according to the risk scores was more than 50%. The anticipated risk of a fatal outcome following CABG would have been 19.8%. PTCA was performed on an average of 2.0 coronary arteries per patient and was successful in 85%. We observed a decline in angina pectoris classification (CCS) from 3.5 to 1.6. An average reduction of 1.1 NYHA class was achieved. The in-hospital mortality was 8.6% (3 patients: 1 × sepsis, 1 × early reocclusion, 1 × cerebral embolism). At 24 months follow-up, a re-PTCA was necessary in four cases because of restenosis. In the remainder, NYHA and CCS class were stable during the follow-up period. An additional five patients died during the first year and two patients in the second year. We conclude that PTCA with the use of a cardiac assist device shows favorable short-term results in a subset of patients with extended coronary artery disease and severely impaired LV function who are not suitable for nonsupported PTCA or CABG due to their risk profile. However, the long term results are not satisfying and stress the need for complete revascularisation with CABG once the patient's condition is stabilized by means of supported PTCA.Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis 07/1996; 38(3):242-8. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199607)38:3<242::AID-CCD4>3.0.CO;2-8
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Background and hypothesis: Increased operator experience, greater insight in stent deployment techniques, and improved poststent medication regimen have significantly reduced the risk of thrombotic stent closure following stent placement in large coronary arteries ( 3.0 mm in diameter). Whether equally favorable results are afforded by stent placement in small vessels (> 3.0 mm), however, remains unclear. Accordingly, the aim of this study was the specific examination of the risk of stent placement in small native coronary vessels, using stent deployment technique consisting of supplementary dilatations with larger balloons or high-pressure inflations, and aggressive aspirin-ticlopidine and short-term oral anticoagulation poststent therapy.Methods: Forty-seven balloon-expandable stents (20 Gianturco-Roubin, 21 NIR, 6 Palmaz-Schatz) were successfully implanted without intravascular guidance in 45 native coronary arteries (mean reference diameter of 2.5 mm) in 44 consecutive patients (31 men, 13 women), the majority of whom (87%) were stented for the treatment of failed or suboptimal balloon angioplasty outcome.Results: Successful stent placement reduced the lesion diameter stenosis from 91 ± 9% to 3 ± 7% (p = 0.0001). There were no early stent thrombosis or major cardiovascular events prior to hospital discharge. During a 12-month follow-up period, most patients remained symptomatically improved and no myocardial infarction, stroke, or death was observed. Five-month angiographic reassessment revealed an in-stent restenosis rate of 41%, which was higher in vessels 2.5 mm in size (47 vs. 33% for vessels > 2.5 mm, p = 0.2747).Conclusions: In selected patients with small native coronary vessels < 3.0 mm in diameter, angiography-guided optimal stent placement is associated with a low risk of stent thrombosis and bleeding complications. However, the in-stent restenosis rate is high with the stents used in this study.Clinical Cardiology 08/1997; 20(8):711 - 716. DOI:10.1002/clc.4960200809 · 2.59 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.