Article

Treatment of orthostatic hypotension with sleeping in the head-up tilt position, alone and in combination with fludrocortisone.

Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Journal of Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 5.79). 09/1992; 232(2):139-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1992.tb00563.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We studied the effect of sleeping in the head-up tilt (HUT) position, alone and in combination with fludrocortisone, on orthostatic tolerance and blood pressure (BP) in six patients with hypoadrenergic orthostatic hypotension. A high salt diet of 150-200 mmol Na+ d-1 was also administered. Combined treatment reduced orthostatic dizziness in all patients (P less than 0.001), and increased the maximal standing period to at least 10 min. HUT alone (n = 4) reduced the BP decrease after 1 min of standing from -64/-42/-25 +/- 29/21/17 mmHg to -53/-37/-23 +/- 31/24/20 mmHg (P less than 0.01 for systolic BP). Addition of fludrocortisone to HUT (HUT/fludro) (n = 5) further reduced the BP decrease after 1 min of standing from -63/-40/-24 +/- 20/12/11 mmHg to -21/-19/-8 +/- 12/10/5 mmHg (P less than 0.05 for systolic, mean and diastolic BP, respectively). BP at maximal standing time increased from 58/47/42 +/- 9/8/7 mmHg initially to 95/69/57 +/- 27/22/20 mmHg during combined treatment (P less than 0.05 for systolic and mean BP), and remained unchanged during the 14-month (range 8-70 month) follow-up period. Nocturnal sodium excretion decreased from 8.0 +/- 2.3 mmol h-1 to 5.9 +/- 1.9 mmol h-1 with combined treatment; body weight increased by 1.6 kg on average (range 0.5-2.4 kg) (P less than 0.01). We conclude that the combination of HUT and fludrocortisone effectively minimizes orthostatic symptoms and increases orthostatic BP in patients with hypo-adrenergic orthostatic hypotension.

0 Followers
 · 
69 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: La hipotensión ortostática (HO) se define como una disminución de la presión arterial sistólica de 20 mmHg o de la diastólica de 10 mmHg, durante el paso a la posición de pie. La HO se asocia con frecuencia a una hipertensión arterial (HTA) y, por otra parte, constituye un factor de riesgo cardiovascular independiente. El arco barorreflejo, la red venosa y el sistema renina-angiotensina son los principales actores de la regulación. Las causas son numerosas; sin embargo, el diagnóstico se basa en el carácter simpaticotónico o no de la HO, que permite distinguir las enfermedades que alteran o no el funcionamiento del sistema simpático. Deben buscarse las causas curables, en especial la iatrogenia. En cambio, las afecciones crónicas como la diabetes o las enfermedades neurodegenerativas (Parkinson, atrofia multisistémica) a menudo son de diagnóstico evidente, pero tienen un pronóstico más sombrío. El tratamiento asocia la educación del paciente, las medidas físicas y los medios farmacológicos, entre los que se encuentran en primera fila la fludrocortisona y la midodrina. Los medicamentos de segunda línea son la eritropoyetina y los análogos de la octreotida. Las dificultades del tratamiento residen en la frecuencia de los efectos indeseables, pero el principal factor limitante es la aparición de una hipertensión de decúbito.
    06/2014; 18(2):1–8. DOI:10.1016/S1636-5410(14)67519-X
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: L’ipotensione ortostatica (IO) è definita da una riduzione della pressione arteriosa sistolica di 20 mmHg o di quella diastolica di 10 mmHg, al momento del passaggio in posizione eretta. L’IO è spesso associata a un’ipertensione arteriosa (ITA) e rappresenta, d’altra parte, un fattore di rischio cardiovascolare indipendente. L’arco baroriflesso, la rete venosa e il sistema renina-angiotensina sono i principali attori della regolazione. Le eziologie sono numerose, ma l’iter diagnostico si fonda sul carattere simpaticotonico o meno dell’IO, permettendo di distinguere le malattie che alterano o meno il funzionamento del sistema simpatico. Sono da ricercare alcune eziologie curabili e, particolarmente, la iatrogenia. Viceversa, le affezioni croniche come il diabete o le malattie neurodegenerative (Parkinson, atrofia multisistemica) sono spesso di diagnosi evidente, ma con una prognosi più infausta. Il trattamento associa l’educazione del paziente, le misure fisiche e i mezzi farmacologici, al primo posto dei quali vi sono il fludrocortisone e la midodrina. I farmaci di seconda linea sono l’eritropoietina e gli analoghi dell’octreotide. Le difficoltà del trattamento risiedono nella frequenza degli effetti collaterali, ma il fattore limitante principale è la comparsa di un’ipertensione da decubito.
    06/2014; 16(2):1–8. DOI:10.1016/S1634-7358(14)67533-1
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective To systematically review the literature on non-pharmacological treatment of orthostatic hypotension. Data Sources MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and SPORTDiscus were searched for human studies written in the English language between January 1980 and April 2013. Reference lists of relevant papers were reviewed for citations to expand the data set. Study Selection Prospective experimental studies assessing non-pharmacological interventions for management of orthostatic drop in blood pressure in various patient populations were included. All studies identified through the literature search were reviewed independently in duplicate. Twenty-three of 642 studies met the selection criteria. Data Extraction Two reviewers independently extracted data for analysis, including systolic and diastolic blood pressure and orthostatic symptoms in response to postural challenge before and after the intervention. All 23 studies were assessed in duplicate for risk of bias using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale for randomized trials and the Downs and Black tool for non-randomized trials. Data synthesis Eight non-pharmacological interventions for management of orthostatic hypotension were identified under two general categories: 1) physical modalities (exercise, functional electrical stimulation, compression, physical countermaneuvers, compression with physical countermaneuvers, and sleeping with head up); 2) dietary measures (water intake, meals). Owing to the clinically diverse nature of the studies, statistical comparison (meta-analysis) was deemed inappropriate. Instead, descriptive comparisons were drawn. Levels of evidence were assigned. Conclusion Strong levels of evidence were found for four of the eight interventions: functional electrical stimulation in spinal cord injury, compression of the legs and/or abdomen and physical countermaneuvers in various patient populations, eating smaller and more frequent meals in chronic autonomic failure. However, this conclusion is based on a limited number of studies with small sample sizes. Further research into all interventions is warranted.
    Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 10/2014; 96(2). DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.09.028 · 2.44 Impact Factor