Article

Differential effects of dipyrone, ibuprofen, and paracetamol on experimentally induced pain in man.

Institute of Physiology and Biokybernetics, University of Erlangen, Germany.
Agents and Actions 02/1992; 35(1-2):112-21. DOI: 10.1007/BF01990960
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In a double-blind cross-over study on 22 healthy subjects the analgesic efficacies of the antipyretic analgesic drugs ibuprofen, dipyrone and paracetamol were tested against placebo using a model of experimentally induced pain. To this purpose interdigital webs were pinched repeatedly for 2 min periods. The painfulness of these stimuli was assessed by the subjects on an electronically controlled visual analogue scale at 10 sec intervals. In addition to the subjective pain ratings the stimulus induced reflex diminution of the blood flow in the stimulated hand was measured with photoplethysmography and laser Doppler flow analysis. The flare response around the stimulated area was assessed with infrared thermography. In this assay system ibuprofen and dipyrone, but not paracetamol, showed statistically significant analgesic effects by preventing hyperalgesia which is normally induced by the repeated stimulation of a skin site. This hypoalgesic effect was not related to the subjective impression of the subjects of the analgesic potency of the respective drug. Sympathetic reflex vasoconstriction was not quantitatively related to the drug induced hypoalgesia. Ibuprofen and, to a minor extent, the other antipyretic analgesic drugs also diminished the stimulus induced flare reaction around the stimulated skin sites.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
37 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study tested a modified experimental model of heat-induced hyperalgesia, which improves the efficacy to induce primary and secondary hyperalgesia and the efficacy-to-safety ratio reducing the risk of tissue damage seen in other heat pain models. Quantitative sensory testing was done in eighteen healthy volunteers before and after repetitive heat pain stimuli (60 stimuli of 48°C for 6 s) to assess the impact of repetitive heat on somatosensory function in conditioned skin (primary hyperalgesia area) and in adjacent skin (secondary hyperalgesia area) as compared to an unconditioned mirror image control site. Additionally, areas of flare and secondary hyperalgesia were mapped, and time course of hyperalgesia determined. After repetitive heat pain conditioning we found significant primary hyperalgesia to heat, and primary and secondary hyperalgesia to pinprick and to light touch (dynamic mechanical allodynia). Acetaminophen (800 mg) reduced pain to heat or pinpricks only marginally by 11% and 8%, respectively (n.s.), and had no effect on heat hyperalgesia. In contrast, the areas of flare (-31%) and in particular of secondary hyperalgesia (-59%) as well as the magnitude of hyperalgesia (-59%) were significantly reduced (all p<0.001). Thus, repetitive heat pain induces significant peripheral sensitization (primary hyperalgesia to heat) and central sensitization (punctate hyperalgesia and dynamic mechanical allodynia). These findings are relevant to further studies using this model of experimental heat pain as it combines pronounced peripheral and central sensitization, which makes a convenient model for combined pharmacological testing of analgesia and anti-hyperalgesia mechanisms related to thermal and mechanical input.
    PLoS ONE 06/2014; 9(6):e99507. · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BackgroundA new experimental protocol of electrically induced pain and hyperalgesia was established to examine orally administered drugs. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study this experimental protocol was used to assess the effects of paracetamol.
    Scandinavian Journal of Pain 10/2010; 1(4):205-210.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Zusammenfassung Fragestellung: In der vorliegenden Studie sollte untersucht werden, ob die von Bier entwickelte Methode einer isolierten Extremität geeignet ist, die periphere analgetische Wirksamkeit von Wirkstoffen zu bestimmen. Methode: Berührungsempfinden (von-Frey-Haare) und klassische Modelle der akuten Nozizeption (thermische und mechanische Schmerzschwellen) sowie experimentelle Hyperalgesiemodelle (mechanische Hyperalgesie nach tonischem Druckreiz und nach Capsaicininjektion) und die Entwicklung einer neurogenen Entzündung (Histaminiontophorese) wurden unter Kontrollbedingungen und den Bedingungen eines Bier-Blocks verglichen. Ergebnisse: Untersuchungen zur Funktion der Aδ- und C-Fasern waren in einem Zeitraum bis zu 30 min nach Beginn der Blutleere uneingeschränkt möglich; allerdings war am Ende dieses Beobachtungszeitraums das durch Aβ-Faser vermittelte Berührungsempfinden bereits verändert. Auf der Basis dieser grundlegenden Untersuchungen konnte mit Hilfe des Bier-Blocks eine periphere Komponente der antihyperalgetischen Wirkung von niedrig dosiertem Lidocain sowie von Morphin gezeigt werden. Schlussfolgerung: Die Methode des Bier-Blocks kann erfolgreich eingesetzt werden, um am Menschen periphere und zentrale Wirkungsmechanismen von analgetisch wirksamen Substanzen zu differenzieren.
    Der Schmerz 04/2000; 14(2):69-76. · 1.50 Impact Factor

Clemens Forster