Conference Paper

Artificial microcontainers for cryopreservation of solitary spermatozoa

Conference: 23th Annual Meeting of the ESHRE

ABSTRACT Human Reproduction. 2007. V. 22, Suppl. 1. P. i154-i155.
http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/content/22/suppl_1/i153.full.pdf

0 Followers
 · 
243 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The introduction of the technique of intracytoplasmic sperm injection to achieve fertilization, especially using surgically retrieved testicular or epididymal sperm from men with obstructive or non-obstructive azoospermia, has revolutionized the field of assisted reproduction. The techniques for the retrieval of spermatozoa vary from relatively simple percutaneous sperm aspiration to open excision (testicular biopsy) and the more invasive Micro-TESE. The probability of retrieving spermatozoa can be as high as 100% in men with obstructive azoospermia (congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens, status post-vasectomy). However, in nonobstructive azoospermia, successful sperm retrieval has been reported in 10-100% of cases by various investigators. The surgical retrieval and cryopreservation of sperm, especially in men with non-obstructive azoospermia, to some extent ensures the availability of sperm at the time of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. In addition, this strategy can avoid unnecessary ovarian stimulation in those patients intending to undergo in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection with freshly retrieved testicular sperm when an absolute absence of sperm in the testis is identified. Several different methods for the cryopreservation of testicular and epididymal sperm are available. The choice of the container or carrier may be an important consideration and should take into account the number or concentration of the sperm in the final preparation. When the number of sperm in a testicular biopsy sample is extremely low (e.g., 1-20 total sperm available), the use of an evacuated zona pellucida to store the cryopreserved sperm has been shown to be an effective approach.
    Clinics 12/2012; 68(Suppl 1):131-140. DOI:10.6061/clinics/2013(Sup01)15 · 1.42 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite broad utilization of sperm cryopreservation, little progress has been made to modify freezing protocols or to improve rates of sperm survival. Vitrification is an alternative method for freezing human spermatozoa without toxic permeable cryoprotectants (CPAs). The purpose of our study was to optimize the vitrification and post thaw recovery of a small number of spermatozoa using only nonpermeating CPAs in a closed straw system in normozoospermic and severely oligozoospermic samples. Individual motile spermatozoa (n = 295) were selected from semen samples of 15 normozoospermic and 10 severe oligozoospermia patients. Overall sperm recovery after vitrification was 80% (n = 236) with 80% (n = 189) viability and 41.5% (n = 98) retained post-warming motility. Two different loading techniques were compared to transfer selected spermatozoa into straws in preparation for vitrification: by spontaneous capillary action (CA) and with the aid of a polar body biopsy (PBB) pipette. There was evidence that the PBB loading technique increases the odds of spermatozoa recovery in both subsets (p = 0.01 and p = 0.04) in the normal and abnormal subsamples, respectively.
    Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine 11/2014; DOI:10.3109/19396368.2014.987855 · 1.70 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Conventional freezing procedures are not appropriate for surgically retrieved spermatozoa from the epididymis or testis because of their low numbers. Techniques for the cryopreservation of small numbers of spermatozoa have not been fully established. We tried to develop a cryopreservation method for a single spermatozoon using Cryotop, which has a simple structure and is easy to handle. Different parameters influencing the freezing procedure, types of container, sources of spermatozoa, and cryoprotectants were evaluated. The sperm recovery rate after thawing was similar between the sperm frozen using Cryotop or zona pellucida as containers (98.0% vs. 88.0%). Freezing of motile single spermatozoa obtained from ejaculates and testes were evaluated for recovery rate (90.0% vs. 95.0%) and motility rate (44.4% vs. 42.1%), which were not significantly different. The survival rate was significantly higher when sperm were treated with sucrose rather than with SpermFreeze (65.3% vs. 37.3%, P < 0.01). Cryotop was a highly effective tool for the cryopreservation of a single spermatozoon, and sucrose was determined to be an efficient cryoprotectant.
    Journal of Mammalian Ova Research 06/2011; DOI:10.1274/jmor.28.47

Full-text

Download
121 Downloads
Available from
Jun 3, 2014