Ecosystem based modeling and indication of ecological integrity in the German North Sea - Case study offshore wind parks

Ecological Indicators (Impact Factor: 3.23). 01/2009; DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.07.004

ABSTRACT Human exploitation and use of marine and coastal areas are apparent and growing in many regions of the world. For instance, fishery, shipping, military, raw material exploitation, nature protection and the rapidly expanding offshore wind power technology are competing for limited resources and space. The development and implementation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) strategies could help to solve these problems. Therefore, suitable spatial assessment, modeling, planning and management tools are urgently needed. These tools have to deal with data that include complex information on different spatial and temporal scales. A systematic approach based on the development of future scenarios which are assessed by combining different simulation models, GIS methods and an integrating set of ecological integrity indicators, was applied in a case study in the German North Sea. Here, the installation of huge offshore wind parks within the near future is planned. The aim was to model environmental effects of altered sea-use patterns on marine biota. Indicators of ecological integrity were used to assess altering conditions and possible ecosystem shifts ranging from systems' degradations to the development of highly productive and diverse artificial reef systems. The results showed that some ecosystem processes and properties and related indicators are sensitive to changes generated by offshore wind park installations while others did not react as hypothesized

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ecological integrity is an overarching concept that integrates multiple properties of ecosystems, including structure, function and resilience to external change. We explore the links between ecological integrity and structural surrogates for ecosystem functioning to develop a cost-effective assessment of functional integrity for marine habitats based on biological traits, abundance and heterogeneity, focused on the visible components of the seafloor, i.e. epibenthic flora and fauna and seabed biogenic habitat features. The assessment was based on diversity and redundancy of functional traits of the identified benthic components, supplemented by estimates of spatial heterogeneity (habitat transitions) and vertical habitat complexity. This approach was developed using video data collected in different years with different sampling strategies in two locations: Kawau Bay in North Island of New Zealand, and Port Pegasus in Stewart Island, off South Island of New Zealand; this last location was a priori expected to be nearly-pristine. Despite variability in sampling techniques and environmental settings, the approach proved effective and evidenced higher measures of Functional Integrity in the Port Pegasus location. This study introduces a first step to measure ecological integrity by successfully converting video data to surrogates of functional integrity, in a way expected to be habitat independent.
    Journal of Sea Research 06/2014; · 1.86 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The goal of this paper is to introduce a statistical concept to derive ecological classifications of terrestrial and marine environments. Such ecological regionalisations reflect spatial combinations of biotic and abiotic characteristics and therefore may serve for environmental planning and monitoring issues. Referring to two case studies the paper presents how to calculate and map ecological defined regions from geodata by use of decision tree models and GIS-techniques. The first study deals with marine environments, exemplified by benthic habitats in the North Sea. The second study is on an ecological land classification of Europe which was computed using surface data on potential natural vegetation, elevation, soil texture and several climatic elements. Both the marine and the terrestrial ecoregions maps were combined with exposure data provided by environmental monitoring activities. The ecological land classification of Europe was intersected with measurement data on the metal loads in mosses taken from the German part of UN ECE moss surveys. In this way, the temporal development of the metal bioaccumulation within ecoregions since 1990 was assessed. The benthic habitat map was used to regionalise the temporal trend of the temperature conditions near the sea floor for the months of July and January from 1995 to 2000 by analysing these measurements according to the spatial categories of the habitat map. In the future, both ecological regionalisations should be used as a spatial framework for the analysis of up-to-date meteorological and phenological data in order to disclose climate change induced impacts.
    Ecological Indicators 01/2009; · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The European Union׳s energy policy aims to increase the proportion of energy derived from renewable sources in Europe. Marine renewable energy, offshore wind energy especially, contributes to the renewable energy mix. Offshore wind farms appear to be clean, and are supported by governments and NGOs as a way to reduce the use of conventional energy resources and thus decrease greenhouse gas emissions. However, developing infrastructure in marine areas can impact marine ecosystems. European directives ask offshore wind farm developers to carry out an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) including a mitigation hierarchy, i.e. envisaging measures that would avoid, reduce, and if possible offset significant adverse effects on ecosystems and human activities. This paper reviews EIA reports from seven European countries and is focused on impacts on the open water marine environment. According to the reports, measures have been taken for avoiding and reducing impacts, so there should be no significant negative residual impacts and hence no need of offsets. But the mitigation hierarchy for ecological impacts seems to have been incompletely implemented, because it is unlikely that there are no significant residual impacts. The paper proposes some technical and ecological explanations, followed by some governance and social explanations, for the absence of biodiversity offsets.
    Marine Policy 09/2014; 48:172–183. · 2.62 Impact Factor