Analysis of Managerial Efficiency Among Agribusiness Firms in Abia State, Nigeria

International Journal of Social Science and Humanity 01/2011; 1:167 - 170. DOI: 10.7763/IJSSH.2011.V1.29


This study assessed the managerial efficiency
among agribusiness firms in Abia state, Nigeria with specific
interest in analyzing their socio – economic characteristics,
managerial efficiency levels and its determinants. Purposive
sampling technique was used in the selection of locations and
firms. Aba and Umuahia were selected given that most of the
commercial firms are located. The study employed 50 firms on
the basis of their investment value (less N5m).Descriptive
statistics and stochastic frontier model were the analytical tools
for the study. The result showed that majority of the firms were
well established and managed by middle aged, sparingly literate
and experienced managers with an appreciable income level
and sizable household. The efficiency level of the managers was
0.62 on the average and managerial efficiency was found to be
influenced positively by age of the firm, age, income, education
of the managers. Efficiency was negatively affected by the
household size of the managers. On the basis of the findings, the
study suggested that periodic trainings and capacity building
programs be organized for the managers to enhance their
expertise and managerial competence.

Download full-text


Available from: Ifeanyi Ndubuto Nwachukwu, Oct 03, 2015
83 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recently the managerial decision making process has been given new attention, both in theoretical studies as well as in empirical research explaining differences in farm results. However, while critical to explaining efficiency, managerial ability has been difficult to measure and therefore often ignored. This study attempts to measure managerial ability. It divides the decision making process into four steps: goal formulation, planning, monitoring and evaluation. The quality of each step is measured in a panel of 26 specialised flower producers, The impact of decision making on the firms' efficiencies is measured by means of a stochastic frontier production function. A one-step procedure is used in which technical and decision making parameters are jointly estimated. The results show positive associations between firm efficiency and the quality of decision making (especially monitoring and firm evaluation), indicating that this procedure has been potentially successful and is a move towards successfully measuring a critical input.
    Agricultural Economics 07/2002; 27(2):175 - 181. DOI:10.1111/j.1574-0862.2002.tb00114.x · 1.19 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Textbooks and articles on farm management stress the importance of the management capacity of the farmer with respect to his farm results. However, explicit definitions together with an elaboration of this concept are hard to find. In this article, aspects of management capacity are grouped into: (1) personal aspects, consisting of farmer's drives and motivations, farmer's abilities and capabilities and his biographical facts such as age and education; and (2) aspects of the decision-making process, consisting of practices and procedures with respect to planning, implementation and control of decisions at the farm. Empirical studies on the role of management capacity in relation to farm results are reviewed. Frontier production functions are widely used in recent literature to estimate technical and economic efficiency of farms. However, in explaining differences in efficiency most studies do not go further than adding a biographical variable (e.g., level of education). This study concludes that a next step would be to include aspects of the decision-making process. Longitudinal on-farm observations, which give possibilities for studying the dynamic aspects of the decision-making, are suggested to further analyze the concept of management capacity.
    Agricultural Economics 05/1998; 18(3-18):261-272. DOI:10.1016/S0169-5150(98)00021-8 · 1.19 Impact Factor